Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I don't really give a shit about technicalities, they're usually really pathetic.

ERMAGERD BILL CLINTON DIDN'T ADMIT TO HAVING AN AFFAIR! HOW DARE HE NOT WANT SOMETHING LIKE THAT IN THE EYE OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC!

ERMAGERD, MAYBE KAVAGANAUGH GOT MORE DRUNK THAN HE SAID HE DID WHEN HE WAS ****ING 18!!! EVEN IF HE DIDN'T RAPE SOMEONE HE SHOULDN'T BE ON THE SUPREME COURT

ERMAGERD, FORD ISN'T A LICENSED DOCTOR!!! BECAUSE THAT'S RELEVANT AT ALL TO THE SITUATION

I can agree to that, but in this case they'd simply be taking their own medicine.

Remember, it was the Dems who established power dynamics establish's morality. A powerful boss having an affair with an intern would get women's rights advocates circling likes vultures, with claims that consent is irrelevant because you have power over her.

So was it with Bill Clinton, and the advocates chose to be silent.

So yeah. If the R's can hang the D's with their own noose, which is usually a "technicality" (This is how the left operates, by sueing over any single technicality of law, like once claiming a generally religiously oriented Boy Scout troop violated an atheist members rights with religious belief), I say go for it.

Originally posted by Trocity
.

So a senator prefaced his questions for Kavanaugh with this: falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. Which essentially means if a witness is caught lying once you can infer they are lying about everything.

The problem is it was Richard Blumenthal saying this lol. The guy who lied about his Vietnam service. So it didn't take the internet long to produce stuff like....

lmao

Bill Maher had Steve Bannon on, I'm kinda shocked. He even said that one of the reasons republicans are in power is because they are willing to go into the "lions den".

Bernie Sanders requests another Kavanaugh investigation. Grassley destroys him with epic statement

So Bernie is saying they need to investigate his drinking, etc. Grassley kinda slaps him down with his response :

"Your public statements clearly reveal how unimportant it is to you to review any facts related to this nomination. So you can imagine my surprise at receiving your letter regarding the supplemental FBI background investigation. This supplemental FBI background investigation was requested by undecided members of both parties. Am I to take from your letter that you are now undecided and seriously willing to engage with the Senate’s advice-and-consent constitutional duties related to the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States? If so, we should have a conversation about what information you need to assist you in making your decision, and I look forward to that conversation."

And then he ends the letter with this:

"I appreciate your raising concerns, which others have already raised, at this 11th hour"

😆

Originally posted by Surtur

I do hate flying. If I need to go somewhere out of state I will either drive or take a train. I've driven from here to Maryland, which is like 14 hours. At least I think it was.

Anyways, the point is she claims she has this fear and yet flies for vacations etc, but she tried to her fear of flying as an excuse to delay. That is what is strange.

To be honest I think she got played. She didn't want to go public, Grassley offered to come to her an do this in private, but her lawyers didn't tell her that.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Most people are too scared to Fly, he is a diseased chump according to posters here. 🙂

I take those as COMPLIMENTS!!!!!

😱

Senators vow ‘full scale’ investigation to determine who leaked Kavanaugh accuser’s letter

Hehe.

Buh buth I thought the Trumpster was supposed to CAVE to the Whiney Democrats now!?

The biggest red flag for me is how could she not know that Grassley offered to come to her, to fly to California. Even if her lawyers never told her, the offer was mentioned in many news articles. It's weird, did she avoid the internet for all that time?

They sacrificed Ford in order to take down Kavanaugh and it doesn't seem like it's a gonna work.

HERE WE GO: Senator Mitch McConnell Badgered At Airport By Anti-Kavanaugh Activists

So basically "he ignored our ranting at him and yet shook hands with a white guy!".

Originally posted by Surtur
HERE WE GO: Senator Mitch McConnell Badgered At Airport By Anti-Kavanaugh Activists

So basically "he ignored our ranting at him and yet shook hands with a white guy!".

It's too early to drink shots. I'll read this tonight, for that drinking game I mentioned some months ago. 🙂

Democrat Senators Reveals How Dems Were Hoping Kavanaugh Would Respond To Allegations

Of course we can't be sure that what is being claimed was true, but yeah it would fit if Democrats were hoping he'd just drop out.

He's more than likely not going to do so.

Originally posted by cdtm
It's too early to drink shots. I'll read this tonight, for that drinking game I mentioned some months ago. 🙂

Remind me of the game, you see I forgot cuz I get black out drunk a lot and tend to go on gang raping sprees so my memory can be fuzzy!

Woman Claimed 4 Dentists Raped Her; Video Evidence Results In Dropped Charges

Now lets hope the woman is charged and imprisoned for at least a couple years. Seems like at least 5 might do the trick, perhaps convince her to not ever try this again.

Oh and the "victims" name is withheld, but the people she said raped her get their names released. Too funny, you should not be able to do this. Her name should be publicly released. Especially since it's been proven she lied they need to name her ASAP.

Surt's agenda, woman should stay quiet if they have been raped or not. He is so Islamic.

My stance is that it should be the same standard of innocent until proven guilty for both. If there's not enough evidence that someone raped someone else or that the other person is lying, nobody should get criminally punished. If either of those things can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt there should be harsh punishment.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
My stance is that it should be the same standard of innocent until proven guilty for both. If there's not enough evidence that someone raped someone else or that the other person is lying, nobody should get criminally punished. If either of those things can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt there should be harsh punishment.