Originally posted by SurturEh.. Nah you're indulging the slippery slope too much. This goes back to the idea of taking the mans legacy as a whole. When the man's legacy is fighting on the side of the rebels who wanted to keep slavery around... that's a different statue then one of a Founding Father who's main legacy was helping to instill democracy in the United States but he also happened to own slaves.
Indeed and slavery is wrong and I can see why people wouldn't like it. But then technically, statues of any slave owners should be wrong. It doesn't matter if they ended up dying before the Civil War happened.