Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

Sacré Bleu: Macron’s Popularity Falls To 25%

I laughed.

Newsweek Reporter Claims She's Never Met Someone With An AR-15 Who Wasn't A Killer, Gets ROASTED

I laughed again. Especially at her claiming it was pro NRA russian bots giving her a hard time(it wasn't).

Alyssa Milano, Group's Co-Founder Denounce Women's March Leaders; They Issue Loaded Response

I laughed again. They kinda cried racism...like these good little leftists have been taught to do.

RakeAmericaGreatAgain.

We all laughed.

Do Russians have nothing better to do than make bots? Because it seems like whenever these progressives get criticized, there's always an army of Russian bots behind it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Let the facts come out, kiddo. Your pouting is so trumpian. Hillary Clinton backer.

😂

The fact that a restraining order was issued indicates that there is enough evidence to warrant (pun intended) the issuance. You cannot just show up to the court house and demand a retraining order.

The evidence is not as rigorous as a criminal court case. Consider it similar to a mild-indictment.

You can get one by showing threatening texts or showing photos of bruising.

Originally posted by dadudemon
The fact that a restraining order was issued indicates that there is enough evidence to warrant (pun intended) the issuance. You cannot just show up to the court house and demand a retraining order.

The evidence is not as rigorous as a criminal court case. Consider it similar to a mild-indictment.

You can get one by showing threatening texts or showing photos of bruising.

I do love how some leftists not only immediately decided Kavanaugh was a bad choice upon hearing he was nominated, but also said they believed Christine Ford. This was without evidence or before any investigation. Yes they did call for the FBI to look into it, but it was not a "hey let's wait and see" type of thing, it was "We believe her and we need an investigation to prove it".

Now all of a sudden we need to wait and see Lol.

Wtf is with the UK and dogs committing hate crimes? They are dogs.

The DOG accused of a hate crime after fouling outside a home in just one of 2,500 cases probed over two years

Originally posted by dadudemon
The fact that a restraining order was issued indicates that there is enough evidence to warrant (pun intended) the issuance. You cannot just show up to the court house and demand a retraining order.

The evidence is not as rigorous as a criminal court case. Consider it similar to a mild-indictment.

You can get one by showing threatening texts or showing photos of bruising.

I am not saying he is innocent at all I just want the facts to come out. My position is the same but the same cannot be said for Surt.

YouTube video

"150 autistic teenagers were given puberty blocking drugs".

This surely will not end in tragedy.

"One autistic teenager is due to have a double mastectomy"

Oh.

So there is some group of autistic students that claim to be transgender and they have attained an unacceptable level of influence in the school and are influencing other students who are younger and autistic to become transgender.

That sounds like a bad lifetime movie, but now it's apparently real life.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yep, I consider myself very fortunate. 👆

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yes... he named an individual. An individual with a lot of influence who is a political actor with a particular agenda.

This is not remotely evidence that he is thinking of or accusing the Jews in collectivist terms. That's the problem I'm having with quite frankly your conspiracy theory about Trump hating Jews. He clearly hates [b]a Jew for his activism towards goals contrary to Trump's own goals, but that's not the same as hating Jews for being Jews.[/B]

He used the office of the president to share a Nazi conspiracy theory. One could argue that it does not represent his views, but if it does not, then he should not have shared it. One could argue that he did not know, but it is his responsibility to know, so ignorance is not an excuse.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
And you want to pretend any talking point used by the alt-right is property of the alt-right and that anyone else who holds that talking point is therefore part of the alt-right.

Soros is a wealthy political activist, conspiracy theories about him are favorable to the alt-right because they are his political adversaries and they hate Jews.

Soros is also a political adversary of Trump's, so there's enough impetus for Trump to be adversarial towards Soros without it having anything to do with some arbitrary animus towards the Jews.

The alt-right has a lot of reason to talk shit about Soros, but that doesn't mean anybody who isn't a part of the alt-right can't also have reason to talk shit about Soros.

This isn't a difficult concept to grasp Adam.

If one does not want to be associated with Nazis, then he should not share Nazi propaganda. It is not a difficult concept to grasp.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Well it's certainly stronger evidence that he isn't antisemetic than "ermagerd he talked shit about a single jew for reasons not necessarily related to his ethnicity! HE'S AN ANTISEMITE"

Someone who says "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are black" could potentially be racist. But if all you have to call them racist is "Oh they talked shit about a specific black person they don't like without bringing up their race once" then you are the one who is full of shit who needs to **** off with that noise Adam, not me, you disingenuous hack.

Nazis: Jews, collectively, are funding the ethnic replacement of white people.

Trump: A specific Jew is funding the ethnic replacement of white people.

You: Just because Trump borrowed a Nazi narrative, because their political goals aligned in this instance, does not mean anything.

Get real.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not saying he is innocent at all I just want the facts to come out. My position is the same...

Seems fair.

Originally posted by Surtur
I do love how some leftists not only immediately decided Kavanaugh was a bad choice upon hearing he was nominated, but also said they believed Christine Ford. This was without evidence or before any investigation. Yes they did call for the FBI to look into it, but it was not a "hey let's wait and see" type of thing, it was "We believe her and we need an investigation to prove it".

Now all of a sudden we need to wait and see Lol.

I do see the hypocrisy. However...if there's one thing we know for sure, Democrats and Republicans are absurdly hypocritical.

Ann Coulter just mocked the president in her tweet. Oh trump.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I do see the hypocrisy. However...if there's one thing we know for sure, Democrats and Republicans are absurdly hypocritical.

They are, but we have a problem where media outlets, etc. tend to ignore the hypocrisy of one side while highlighting the other sides hypocrisy. And the media in general failed to go after the lies of the previous administration. More than once Obama repeated debunked stats and you didn't see CNN pounce. In fact CNN fact checked a damn SNL skit about Obama. But Trump fibs about his crowd size? Oh shit!

Originally posted by Surtur
They are, but we have a problem where media outlets, etc. tend to ignore the hypocrisy of one side while highlighting the other sides hypocrisy. And the media in general failed to go after the lies of the previous administration. More than once Obama repeated debunked stats and you didn't see CNN pounce. In fact CNN fact checked a damn SNL skit about Obama. But Trump fibs about his crowd size? Oh shit!
Quit crying. Trump deserves this and you know it. He brings it on himself.

Mexican Protesters: "Trump Was Right, This Is An Invasion"

YouTube video

Hmm.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit crying. Trump deserves this and you know it. He brings it on himself.

Wrong. Trump's a victim, a poor victim of all this.

Originally posted by Robtard
Wrong. Trump's a victim, a poor victim of all this.
Did you see his interview with Wallace on Fox? Oh the man is such an idiot it is just cringe worth hearing his idiotic responses.

When Looking thru your Loony Lefty Goggles I am sure you Always See things the Way YOU Want to See them.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

He used the office of the president to share a Nazi conspiracy theory. One could argue that it does not represent his views, but if it does not, then he should not have shared it. One could argue that he did not know, but it is his responsibility to know, so ignorance is not an excuse.

If one does not want to be associated with Nazis, then he should not share Nazi propaganda. It is not a difficult concept to grasp.

Nazis: Jews, collectively, are funding the ethnic replacement of white people.

Trump: A specific Jew is funding the ethnic replacement of white people.

You: Just because Trump borrowed a Nazi narrative, because their political goals aligned in this instance, does not mean anything.

Get real.


Except again, you're assuming that Trump borrowed it from the neonazis rather than it being a more widespread conspiracy theory to begin with than just one of the neonazis. Non-alt-right rightwingers have been making these accusations about Soros for a while now. Fox News did a thing on him as early as 2007, the Daily Telegraph in the UK, etc.

A lot of people on the right theorize about Soros, but everyone decides to go with the Nazis as the only group so they can cast the worst aspersions they can think of at their opponents.

You wanna accuse Trump of being stupid, bloviating, or being a conspiracy theory ****, then be my guest. You wanna suggest that Trump is colluding with the neonazis, well my friend that's a conspiracy theory as well.