Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Who said that? I'd imagine there were some good ole fashioned confederate statue lovers, somewhere among the Nazis, KKK, Alt-Right, White Supremacist.

Okay. Then how is Antifa just as culpable for her death? Let along the regular people just protesting hate speech? (You do this with the moral equalizer)

They are just as culpable for the violent clashes that took place. The only injuries were not as a result of a dude driving a car.

Let me bottom line this: both sides had pieces of dog shit. Both sides had people who committed violence and who showed up looking for a fight.

Originally posted by Surtur
Because they were a part of the violent clashes of the day. Now, did you need anything further answered?

Okay, but they were not involved in the only incident that resulted in mass-injuries and death. In fact, they were not even targeted or the victims of that incident. So what does their participation in other incidents have to do with this one?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Okay, but they were not involved in the only incident that resulted in mass-injuries and death. In fact, they were not even targeted or the victims of that incident. So what does their participation in other incidents have to do with this one?

We weren't just discussing that. At least I wasn't. Any other questions?

Originally posted by Surtur
They are just as culpable for the violent clashes that took place. The only injuries were not as a result of a dude driving a car.

Let me bottom line this: both sides had pieces of dog shit. Both sides had people who committed violence and who showed up looking for a fight.

See, this is the issue people have. You're still applying the same code of morals to all, when one side are literal Nazis and murdered someone in an act of terror.

Originally posted by Robtard
See, this is the issue people have. You're still applying the same code of morals to all, when one side are literal Nazis and murdered someone in an act of terror.

I said nothing untrue. They are just as culpable for the violent clashes. Both sides were dog shit, both had people who showed up ready and willing to commit violence.

So if you have a problem with the truth that is irrelevant to me. Or were you truly about to argue both sides weren't culpable in the violent clashes? And that both didn't have people showing up ready for a fight?

Except of course as noted in the other thread, you're bringing down the innocent victims of a terrorist; one who was murdered no less, to the same level of said terrorist with your "meh, they're all shit" approach. One is a terrorist, the other 20 were innocent victims, one being murdered.

But you go on with your "it's the truth" antics.

Originally posted by Robtard
Except of course as noted in the other thread, you're bringing down the innocent victims of a terrorist; one who was murdered no less, to the same level of said terrorist with your "meh, they're all shit" approach. One is a terrorist, the other 20 were innocent victims, one being murdered.

I said both sides are culpable for the violent clashes. Both sides had violent pieces of shit. That doesn't mean the people hit by the car were violent, as those folk did not solely make up the other side.

Was that noted in the other thread as well?

Originally posted by Surtur
We weren't just discussing that. At least I wasn't. Any other questions?

Well, that is the problem.

Everyone else is condemning a Nazi committing domestic terrorism, murdering one and injuring 19 others; and you are interjecting, "What about all the shitty people on the left," into the conversation as if it has any relevance whatsoever.

It is literally a deflection from a one-sided violent incident, by raising other violent incidents involving completely different actors.

It is also a smear against the completely innocent victims, by painting them with the brush of the violent actions of other people.

It also casts the perpetrator and the victims as mutual combatants, with the victims simply not getting what they bargained for, and deserving of the remuneration they received.

It makes you look like a Nazi sympathizer, when you should be sympathizing with the victims.

yet. one. side. targeted. a. peaceful. group. and. murdered.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Well, that is the problem.

Everyone else is condemning a Nazi committing domestic terrorism, murdering one and injuring 19 others; and you are interjecting, "What about all the shitty people on the left," into the conversation as if it has any relevance whatsoever.

It is literally a deflection from a one-sided violent incident, by raising other violent incidents involving completely different actors.

It is also a smear against the completely innocent victims, by painting them with the brush of the violent actions of other people.

It also casts the perpetrator and the victims as mutual combatants, with the victims simply not getting what they bargained for, and deserving of the remuneration they received.

It makes you look like a Nazi sympathizer, when you should be sympathizing with the victims.

I'm just tired of dipshits acting like violence was only from one side.

Nope, doesn't mean I sympathize with nazis.

Both sides were culpable in the violence of the day. If that fact bothers you...oh well? Lol. I dunno what to say. A nazi sympathizer to me is someone who thinks they are getting a bad rep. Nah, f*ck them. They deserve their reputation, I don't sympathize with their treatment.

We just won't be denying reality. If you want to? Go into the violent nazis thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
yet. one. side. targeted. a. peaceful. group. and. murdered.

And that is horrible and doesn't negate the culpability of both sides for the violent clashes.

We won't be ignoring the violence from one side lol. If this triggers you I advise you leave thread. You wanna say only one side had someone who took it upon themselves to drive a car into people? Bingo, 100% correct.

I'll give you one thing. I'm not entirely sure if you realize what you're doing and just refuse to change because of your epic arrogance, or if you legit can't see how shitty you're behaving in regards Nazis murdering an innocent. I do hope it's the later, as ignorance is better than being scummy.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm just tired of dipshits acting like violence was only from one side.

Nope, doesn't mean I sympathize with nazis.

Both sides were culpable in the violence of the day. If that fact bothers you...oh well? Lol. I dunno what to say. A nazi sympathizer to me is someone who thinks they are getting a bad rep. Nah, f*ck them. They deserve their reputation, I don't sympathize with their treatment.

We just won't be denying reality. If you want to? Go into the violent nazis thread.

Well, the only violence that resulted in mass-casualties and death that day was one-sided.

It is as if you think a person being punched and another person being murdered are morally equivalent.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Well, the only violence that resulted in mass-casualties and death that day was one-sided.

It is as if you think a person being punched and another person being murdered are morally equivalent.

Lol nope, let me tell you what I think: I think both sides were culpable in the violent clashes that took place. I think both sides had people who came specifically looking to do violence or at least hoping for an excuse to do it.

Lol, chumps:

Radical leftist groups continue to call for more battles in the street

This is gonna be the new angle for these braindead losers. They are "protecting" people.

Also a CNN commentator tweeted out a picture of troops landing on Normandy and said "also confronted the nazis without a permit".

LMAO!

^^A campaign spokesmans for Hilary as well, lol. I love it. "Confronted the nazis without a permit".

Yep, I'm convinced, there is no way the violent leftists can not be denounced. Sorry, not when this shit is going down.

If anyone else has any further questions, just refer to the above mentioned tweet.

Hmmm

Children recognize they’re ‘transgender’ by age 2: psychologist

Totally normal.

Any sort of islamic terrorism triggers the left and immodestly results in trying hard to avoid it.

This "gender creative" shit sounds even stupider than "genderfluid."

Its odd how you can be whatever gender you want now, but people can't get over their respective skin colors.