Shit that is the entire 30 min phone call transcript being read by Sargon and someone else, here is Matt's own video on the call, which summarizes the best parts:
Shit that is the entire 30 min phone call transcript being read by Sargon and someone else, here is Matt's own video on the call, which summarizes the best parts:
Democrats CAUGHT In Russian Bot "False Flag" Smear Campaign
^Remember this whenever you see a leftist whining like a b*tch over Russia.
Originally posted by Surtur
Democrats CAUGHT In Russian Bot "False Flag" Smear Campaign^Remember this whenever you see a leftist whining like a b*tch over Russia.
Interesting. hmm
Nice of him to also point out that the GOP does this same exact bullshit. Or else I would have called him out.
I believe him when he says he's not pro-GOP. He is often posted by Trumpers for calling out the stupid shit the Dems do and the SJWs do.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Interesting. hmmNice of him to also point out that the GOP does this same exact bullshit. Or else I would have called him out.
I believe him when he says he's not pro-GOP. He is often posted by Trumpers for calling out the stupid shit the Dems do and the SJWs do.
Yep, he flat out says he's not a conservative.
What happens is if any leftists decide not to act like f*cking lunatics and call out the shenanigans they see going on...they get called Trumpers.
Speaking of the left kinda chomping down on their own:
Feminist Tries To Get Progressive Podcaster Fired For Defending White Men
CwXl1H3Hd08&t
Mizzou Official Claims Tall Men Asking Out Short Women Could Constitute Sexual Misconduct
"She was further questioned as to the “nature of [John’s] power over her.” The interviewer asked if it was just John’s “size” that contributed to that “power.”
Scroggs responded: “His physical size.”
The interviewer then said part of the conduct code “doesn’t require him to be a teacher.” And asked, “When it says person of authority, it doesn’t mean, like, a teacher or boss?”
Scroggs responded: “Well, I suppose it could; but in this case, no, I didn’t interpret it that way.”
So while most people would assume “power or authority” refers to a professor or other superior’s relationship with a student, Scroggs indicated that literally being larger than another person and asking them out could be an unfair sexual situation."
smh
TheDailyWire is not alt-right, Jordan Peterson is not alt-right, Sargon is not alt-right, Computing Forever is not alt-right, Ben Shapiro is not alt-right.
Criticism of social justice can range anywhere from the alt-right, to non-racist conservatives, to libertarians, to centrists, to the center left, to even people who are solidly left economically who take issue with obsessing over everyone's group identity and using discriminatory practices and judgments to promote diversity, to even some of the communists who think that focusing on identity groups is just a way to distract from class conflict.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
TheDailyWire is not alt-right, Jordan Peterson is not alt-right, Sargon is not alt-right, Computing Forever is not alt-right, Ben Shapiro is not alt-right.Criticism of social justice can range anywhere from the alt-right, to non-racist conservatives, to libertarians, to centrists, to the center left, to even people who are solidly left economically who take issue with obsessing over everyone's group identity and using discriminatory practices and judgments to promote diversity, to even some of the communists who think that focusing on identity groups is just a way to distract from class conflict.
Either it's trolling or he legit cannot comprehend what being "alt right" means.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
TheDailyWire is not alt-right, Jordan Peterson is not alt-right, Sargon is not alt-right, Computing Forever is not alt-right, Ben Shapiro is not alt-right.Criticism of social justice can range anywhere from the alt-right, to non-racist conservatives, to libertarians, to centrists, to the center left, to even people who are solidly left economically who take issue with obsessing over everyone's group identity and using discriminatory practices and judgments to promote diversity, to even some of the communists who think that focusing on identity groups is just a way to distract from class conflict.
I'm liberal and libertarian (a mix of both).
I think leftists and many kinds of liberals are racist and sexist. I've explained many times why, already, too. Obsessing over people's skin color or sex/gender and being vocal about how stupid, weak, poor, or less capable those groups are is just racist. It's the same exact White-Supremacist Bullshit Cake but decorated with a seemingly righteous frosting.
You know who calls him that? The ALT-RIGHT
You must be sending out racist dog whistles Adam, you are a racist. And if you defend yourself that's more proof that you're a racist because a non-racist wouldn't need to defend themselves.
Also I noticed in another thread that you suggested there are sexist attitudes towards men in law enforcement? Well how dare you. Bringing up men's issues is just a way to undermine feminism, and why would you try and undermine feminism unless you're a sexist!
You have a lot of explaining to do here Adam and if you do try and defend yourself it just proves you're a bigot.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm liberal and libertarian (a mix of both).I think leftists and many kinds of liberals are racist and sexist. I've explained many times why, already, too. Obsessing over people's skin color or sex/gender and being vocal about how stupid, weak, poor, or less capable those groups are is just racist. It's the same exact White-Supremacist Bullshit Cake but decorated with a seemingly righteous frosting.
It's to the point of parody. It really is. It's why I can't help but laugh when they talk about how Trump is embarrassing this country.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm liberal and libertarian (a mix of both).I think leftists and many kinds of liberals are racist and sexist. I've explained many times why, already, too. Obsessing over people's skin color or sex/gender and being vocal about how stupid, weak, poor, or less capable those groups are is just racist. It's the same exact White-Supremacist Bullshit Cake but decorated with a seemingly righteous frosting.
"Freedom allows white people to control everything"-Thomas Smith
"Oh my God! You're a white supremacist! You are a white supremacist with a guilty conscience!"-Sargon
Just from me interacting with you I personally would consider you a genuine actual social liberal (though you can use whatever labels you'd like) meaning you value individual liberty and judging people as individuals, but you'd like to see a safety net and shit with things like UBI and healthcare and shit.
Generally speaking I don't refer to any of the race obsessed weirdos as liberals. To me liberalism is based around the principle of individualism and individual sovereignty. People have rights as individuals, and their individual liberty in their lives should be the primary goal of government and people should be judged as individuals. Someone such as myself I would consider a classical liberal since I'm a free marketeer, whereas with someone such as you it's clear you have the addendum of a safety net but I'd still consider you a liberal, a social liberal specifically.
When it gets to the point where you stop viewing people as individuals and the game becomes about group justice group rights and group equality rather than individual justice individual rights and individual equality, that's when I'd stop referring to someone as a liberal. Illiberal progressive is generally how I'd refer to the SJW types.
University Of Oklahoma Introduces A Feminist James Bond Course
Lol...this is real life.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Just from me interacting with you I personally would consider you a genuine actual social liberal (though you can use whatever labels you'd like) meaning you value individual liberty and judging people as individuals, but you'd like to see a safety net and shit with things like UBI and healthcare and shit.
Yup, you've got me 100%. 👆
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Generally speaking I don't refer to any of the race obsessed weirdos as liberals. To me liberalism is based around the principle of individualism and individual sovereignty. People have rights as individuals, and their individual liberty in their lives should be the primary goal of government and people should be judged as individuals. Someone such as myself I would consider a classical liberal since I'm a free marketeer, whereas with someone such as you it's clear you have the addendum of a safety net but I'd still consider you a liberal, a social liberal specifically.
We are close, here. I am in favor of no-nonsense regulations that are beneficial. There's a "let's go deeper" aspect to libertarianism and that is the idea that an individual does not have maximum freedom in a capitalist corporatocracy that was birthed from environment bereft of certain regulations. Meaning, to maximize individual freedom, some regulations are required.
IIRC, Robtard is the same as we are but errs on the side of a bit more regulations than I do. So it would be better to put us on a sliding scale with pure anarchy being 0 and very lightly sprinkled libertarianism being a 10. I am probably a 6, Robtard a 7 or 8, and you a 4.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
When it gets to the point where you stop viewing people as individuals and the game becomes about group justice group rights and group equality rather than individual justice individual rights and individual equality, that's when I'd stop referring to someone as a liberal. Illiberal progressive is generally how I'd refer to the SJW types.
Yes, this is exactly what I think about SJWs.