Originally posted by Sable
I doubt either will run. But I do expect consistency from Rob if she does. Personally I dont care if she does or doesnt.
Your premise is flawed, as pointed out, Chelsea was never the recipient of nepotism in the White House, no office, no position, no tagging along to presidential meetings tc. So how can I be upset here at something that never happened?
But yes, if Clinton had won and Chelsea got to play at being Hand to the President, I'd have shit on that too; big wet shits. Not sure Clinton would have been as stupid though, while she might want to do it, she'd know how bad it'd look. Same goes for making her son-in-law 'Fixer of all things', like Trump has.
Originally posted by Sable
Because it couldnt but given her high position in the CGI, she would have the same position as Ivanka now.
If you want to go "But Clinton would have done the same or worse!" pretend scenarios as a means to defend Trump's shitty actual actions, go ahead, but that's not really a valid defense.
IMO, I think you're the type of person that finds nepotism in general, not even this blatantly obscene level of nepotism in the Trump WH, to be disgusting. Even if you won't admit it now cos Trump.
Well, no; here's the proof:
Originally posted by Robtard
But yes, if Clinton had won and Chelsea got to play at being Hand to the President, I'd have shit on that too; big wet shits. Not sure Clinton would have been as stupid though, while she might want to do it, she'd know how bad it'd look. Same goes for making her son-in-law 'Fixer of all things', like Trump has.
Need a redo? Or do you want to continue defending Trump with imagined Clinton deflections? I'm cool either way.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, no; here's the proof:Need a redo? Or do you want to continue defending Trump with imagined Clinton deflections? I'm cool either way.
Lol, in that quote you say *if* she behaved that way you would be upset. I was saying you were triggered over people saying that she indeed would behave that way.
IOW: You are saying you'd be upset if she did it, but it seems like you do not think she would actually do it.
Originally posted by Robtard
If you want to go "But Clinton would have done the same or worse!" pretend scenarios as a means to defend Trump's shitty actual actions, go ahead, but that's not really a valid defense.IMO, I think you're the type of person that finds nepotism in general, not even this blatantly obscene level of nepotism in the Trump WH, to be disgusting. Even if you won't admit it now cos Trump.
Huma (whom hillary considered a daughter) was up for SOS or Chieff of Staff. ****ing please, you think Chelsea was going to flapping in the wind? Come the fck on.
Originally posted by Sable
Huma (whom hillary considered a daughter) was up for SOS or Chieff of Staff. ****ing please, you think Chelsea was going to flapping in the wind? Come the fck on.
Okay? Huma is not actual family and that's still speculation but already answered:
The "Clinton would have done it" is no Trump defense at all. Even if you somehow knew for a fact, another's shitty actions do not excuse shitty actions actually happening.