Originally posted by cdtm
100 (The comic series about a guy who gives people a license to murder) made mention of "nature magazines", and I kind of wanted to see if they were making that up.They were not.
One could spin it all they want as "Hey, it's a lifestyle choice and we record it for the curious", and to that I say: Bullshit.
Defend this too rob. Take a shot.
To be fair, I'm sure he knows all about it (Nudism is niche, but not exactly unknown, although the details might not be common knowledge).
Personally, I have no problem with the concept of camps, where older nature crazies think going clothless is healthy.
It's the various media for mass consumption I see as a serious grey area. For obvious reasons.
Also, Adam is right. I made an offhand joke, but it's apples to oranges.
Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure what you're talking about exactly, but I'm not obligated to defend your strawman attacks of me.Which of course is just a distraction from your early foot-in-ass move.
Out of curiosity, you watched the video right? And did not just comment based on a gif Adam posted?
This will be fun, curious if folk will defend the NYT changing an accurate headline cuz babies whined:
Originally posted by Surtur
This will be fun, curious if folk will defend the NYT changing an accurate headline cuz babies whined:
Alright, now I'm triggered. How utterly dishonest.
If NYT responded all over the internet with something like, "Hey, morons, that's what he actually said. Calm down and stop being rabidly hysterical because Trump said something that literally everyone agrees with." I would have respected them, more. Instead, they are doing what all companies are doing: they caved to political correctness (which is usually political incorrectness) at the cost of the facts and integrity. How appalling.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Alright, now I'm triggered. How utterly dishonest.If NYT times responding all over the internet with something like, "Hey, morons, that's what he actually said. Calm down and stop being rabidly hysterical because Trump said something that literally everyone agrees with." I would have respected them, more. Instead, they are doing what all companies are doing: they caved to political correctness (which is usually political incorrectness) at the cost of the facts and integrity. How appalling.
I guess you can't link twitter directly anymore.
Check out the Oliver Willis link in the article, the comments are not exactly people who want facts, or nuance. Trump and the right is evil, racist bigots, PERIOD.
NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Rips NY Cops’ Response After They Were Doused: ‘Impotent’
This seems like a no win scenario. I doubt these people would peacefully surrender if the cops tried something.
So then we'd have "Cops get violent over water!" when in reality most of those doing the dousing would slap the ever loving shit out of anyone throwing water on them.
Beto O’Rourke Is ‘Absolutely’ Open To A Mandatory Gun Buyback Program
Someone tell this dude he's running for office in America and not Australia or New Zealand.
I'm calling it now: if god is real at least one person in australia refused the gun buy back and said the dingo ate their guns.
Originally posted by Surtur
I have a question for people. There are two scenarios:A man shoots an innocent 5 times and kills him.
Another man shoots an innocent 5 times and the victim miraculously survives.
Which shooter is worse?
According to the law: the one who committed murder is worse than the one that committed attempted murder
You and your games. Just be direct.
Originally posted by Robtard
According to the law: the one who committed murder is worse than the one that committed attempted murder
Did not ask about the law.
Is a murderer who failed by sheer luck a better or worse man than one who succeeded, yes or no? Just looking for your opinion, is the killer who failed more worth defending than the one who succeeded?
Originally posted by Robtard
My opinion is that murder is worse than attempted murder. Cos one created a dead body.The law happens to agree with my opinion.
I'm talking about morally, is a man who tries but fails superior to one who succeeds? Does that man have the moral high ground? If he were to run his mouth about someone who had successfully murdered, would he have room to do so?