Originally posted by Silent Master
How is the state "keeping people poor"?
I can tell you that Democratic policies have ruined black families since the Civil Rights movement. Those policies broke up the black family and have kept SEM very low and even reversed the black community's SES. Since LBJ LITERALLY said that this is the strategy of the Democratic Party, I don't understand why people don't recognize the policies are intended to be harmful to actual SEM among black people (and other poor race-based demographics).
Trans activist Jessica Yaniv rejected from beauty pageant - files human rights complaint!
😆
Originally posted by dadudemon
I can tell you that Democratic policies have ruined black families since the Civil Rights movement. Those policies broke up the black family and have kept SEM very low and even reversed the black community's SES. Since LBJ LITERALLY said that this is the strategy of the Democratic Party, I don't understand why people don't recognize the policies are intended to be harmful to actual SEM among black people (and other poor race-based demographics).
Yep, Thomas Sowell even spoke about it when he was younger. For instance, he claims as a whole, Black people never voted for minimum wages, it was voted for them.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/30/us/denver-birth-in-jail-lawsuit/index.html
Every time something like this happens in a comic, manga, or show, I think its artistic license of something that would never, ever happen in modern a first world nation.
So what were these policies and procedures, exactly? I'd like to know what policy would possibly justify medical personnel and security guards passively watching through a camera like Japanese fetishists.
Wtf is going on in Scotland?
Scottish Bill Would Criminalize ‘Hate Speech’ in Private Homes
Schmooze or lose is the message from the new study, but only if you are a guy. Its authors, Zoe Cullen of Harvard and Ricardo Perez-Truglia of the University of California Los Angeles, did a large-scale study of a commercial bank in Asia, tracking what happened to workers when they got a new manager. Their conclusion, based on observing 14,736 workers, showed that men’s career trajectories improved significantly when they switched from a female to male supervisor, translating to a 13-per-cent increase in pay when observed 10 quarters after the transition. For women, however, switching bosses to either a man or a woman did not translate into higher pay
Their conclusion, based on observing 14,736 workers, showed that men’s career trajectories improved significantly when they switched from a female to male supervisor, translating to a 13-per-cent increase in pay when observed 10 quarters after the transition. For women, however, switching bosses to either a man or a woman did not translate into higher pay
Neither men nor women get paid more from a woman boss.
If you're an investor or CEO, who will you want managing the rabble. Someone who pays more money to employees. Or someone who keeps wages low, regardless of whether you're a man or woman?
This explains why you see so many women in management positons these days, in my opinion. Its not about equality. It's veiled misogyny based on a belief women are heartless taskmasters who can't be schmoozed.
Read between the lines. Specifically, this part:
Schmooze or lose is the message from the new study, but only if you are a guy. Its authors, Zoe Cullen of Harvard and Ricardo Perez-Truglia of the University of California Los Angeles, did a large-scale study of a commercial bank in Asia, tracking what happened to workers when they got a new manager. Their conclusion, based on observing 14,736 workers, showed that men’s career trajectories improved significantly when they switched from a female to male supervisor, translating to a 13-per-cent increase in pay when observed 10 quarters after the transition. For women, however, switching bosses to either a man or a woman did not translate into higher pay
Read between the lines, specifically this part:
Their conclusion, based on observing 14,736 workers, showed that men’s career trajectories improved significantly when they switched from a female to male supervisor, translating to a 13-per-cent increase in pay when observed 10 quarters after the transition. For women, however, switching bosses to either a man or a woman did not translate into higher pay
Neither men nor women get paid more from a woman boss.
If you're an investor or CEO, who will you want managing the rabble. Someone who pays more money to employees. Or someone who keeps wages low, regardless of whether you're a man or woman?
This explains why you see so many women in management positons these days, in my opinion. Its not about equality. It's veiled misogyny based on a belief women are heartless taskmasters who can't be schmoozed.
Originally posted by Surtur
He said we didn't have this level of violence before, referring to the 100 days of riotingSo how is he moving the goalposts when he points out you didn't top that?
I didn't say I would top it. In fact I specifically said that I didn't recall similar levels of ongoing rioting.
What I said was that it doesn't matter who is President. The violence will continue because a change of President doesn't equate to the issues going away. I proved this by referencing riots and violence under Obama. I further proved this with a link showing violence and riots relating to the exact same issues that recent violence is related to. Namely systemic racism and police violence. These issues will not go away under Biden.
Regarding his moving the goalposts His caveats have moved from asking if "the leftists will stop rioting" and moved through the violence being backed by media, politicians and celebrities and now to a specific time frame of violence.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I didn't say I would top it. In fact I specifically said that I didn't recall similar levels of ongoing rioting.What I said was that it doesn't matter who is President. The violence will continue because a change of President doesn't equate to the issues going away. I proved this by referencing riots and violence under Obama. I further proved this with a link showing violence and riots relating to the exact same issues that recent violence is related to. Namely systemic racism and police violence. These issues will not go away under Biden.
Regarding his moving the goalposts His caveats have moved from asking if "the leftists will stop rioting" and moved through the violence being backed by media, politicians and celebrities and now to a specific time frame of violence.
See the problem with all this is his point was we were seeing more violence than before so I dunno I would figure a relevant link would be showing similar stuff.
Since the claim was never no violence happened under other people.
But no we did not see right wingers riot for 100+ days under Obama.
Originally posted by SurturNo because Obama had the majority of the people, the peoples vote.
See the problem with all this is his point was we were seeing more violence than before so I dunno I would figure a relevant link would be showing similar stuff.Since the claim was never no violence happened under other people.
But no we did not see right wingers riot for 100+ days under Obama.
Originally posted by Surtur
See the problem with all this is his point was we were seeing more violence than before so I dunno I would figure a relevant link would be showing similar stuff.Since the claim was never no violence happened under other people.
But no we did not see right wingers riot for 100+ days under Obama.
I didn't say he claimed there was no violence under other people.
His initial post was
Originally posted by Silent Master
If Biden wins. do you think all the leftists will stop rioting?
I said
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
The rioters don't care who's President.
And
QUOTE=17313208]Originally posted by jaden_2.0
They rioted under Obama.
[/QUOTE]
Then the first shift in goalposts occurred
Originally posted by Silent Master
To the same degree?
Then the second
Originally posted by Silent Master
Will they riot the same amount and will they receive the same amount of support and encouragement from the media, politicians and celebrities?
Then the third
Originally posted by Silent Master
[B]I didn't see any examples of 100+ days of riots that were supported by the media and politicians.So, thank you.
See. That's shifting of goalposts.