Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Another fake poll, eh?Only 20% my ass.
You make the mistake of thinking everyone who voted for him is a hug supporter who swallows everything he says. They’re not. Many people vote for him despite thinking he’s full of shit. 20% is about in line with how big his base of hardcore supporters is.
Originally posted by BackFire
You make the mistake of thinking everyone who voted for him is a hug supporter who swallows everything he says. They’re not. Many people vote for him despite thinking he’s full of shit. 20% is about in line with how big his base of hardcore supporters is.
Legit laughed out loud at this. Not at you, but because this "I voted despite disliking him" thing wasn't accepted by certain folk when it was trumpers saying it about Hillary.
Originally posted by BackFire
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that a lot of people voted for him despite not liking him or even supporting a lot of what he says. A lot of people are single issue voters and will vote based on low taxes or abortion even if they don’t like the candidate.
Maybe, but on here I know there was a lot of pushback to the suggestion that anyone but trumpers caused his win. Not from you, but from certain folk.
But dems played a role, in their choice of candidate and in how they conducted themselves.
Originally posted by BackFire
You make the mistake of thinking everyone who voted for him is a hug supporter who swallows everything he says. They’re not. Many people vote for him despite thinking he’s full of shit. 20% is about in line with how big his base of hardcore supporters is.
A vote for Trump is a vote to support Trump.
AKA, a Trumper.
Not all Trumper's are fans of Trump.
Oh shit, maybe this is more serious than I thought.
Less than half of voters think Biden won the election:
This spells civil unrest. I don't want more civil war. How do we calm people down and make them focus on the go forward path?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh shit, maybe this is more serious than I thought.Less than half of voters think Biden won the election:
This spells civil unrest. I don't want more civil war. How do we calm people down and make them focus on the go forward path?
I HOPE YOU AREN'T POSTING MORE FAKE NEWS LIKE A PHAGGOT, BECAUSE REUTERS SAYS 80%, BUT LET'S LISTEN TO A BLATANT PROPOGANDA SITE🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
DDM, how low you have fallen. YOU HAVE OFFICIALLY LOST DUDE STATUS. EL DUDERINO DOES NOT ABIDE 😶
Originally posted by Lestov16
I HOPE YOU AREN'T POSTING MORE FAKE NEWS LIKE A PHAGGOT, BECAUSE REUTERS SAYS 80%, BUT LET'S LISTEN TO A BLATANT PROPOGANDA SITE🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭😭DDM, how low you have fallen. YOU HAVE OFFICIALLY LOST DUDE STATUS. EL DUDERINO DOES NOT ABIDE 😶
Don't forget that Rasmussen correctly projected a Biden win by the correct margin.
👆
They are 2/2 elections where almost every other pollster got it wrong.
Several New York Times staffers agreed with Bari Weiss' scathing resignation letter, report claims
"Wiedeman detailed how Times employees created a Slack channel -- a workplace messaging system widely used by news organizations -- to vent and complain about the situation which “served as a heated pandemic-era office watercooler.” Executive editor Dean Baquet even joined the Slack channel, according to Wiedeman.
“The conversations could become tense. Employees would paste tweets criticizing the paper into the channel; the journalists would get defensive; someone would leak the argument to friends with Twitter accounts; and the ouroboros of self-criticism would take another bite out of its tail and everyone’s time,” Wiedeman wrote. "
Lol.
"The magazine reported that many Times staffers agreed with Weiss’ resignation letter critiques.
“While Bari Weiss’s description of a young woke mob taking over the paper was roundly criticized, several Times employees I spoke to saw truth to the dynamic,” Wiedeman wrote.
“The dustup laid bare a divide that had become increasingly tricky for the Times: a large portion of the paper’s audience, a number of its employees, and the president himself saw it as aligned with the #resistance. This demarcation horrified the Old Guard, but it seemed to make for good business,” Wiedeman wrote."
Giggle
"Wiedeman noted that Times staffers openly wept when President Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016"
Originally posted by Surtur
Leftists want folks to move to Georgia to increase Democratic votes for US Senate runoffs — but tactic could be a felonyLol, so dumb.
Well...
This is how elections go.
For them to think it feasible to move all those people there in time, get them places to stay, etc....
Well, look at the comments on Slate, even they think it's retarded:
And these are people who by and large are pro Green New Deal. So if they think it's retarded then damn, it's like Keith Richards telling someone they use too many drugs. Holy shit if *Keith Richards* thinks you do too much maybe tone it down.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh shit, maybe this is more serious than I thought.Less than half of voters think Biden won the election:
This spells civil unrest. I don't want more civil war. How do we calm people down and make them focus on the go forward path?
By stirring the pot further.
A lot further.
If I was in charge, my tactic would be make people so angry they can't see straight, on the theory that it must eventually burn itself out. Anger is not infinite, human beings have an upper limit, throw a tantrum, and burn themselves out, as any parent knows.
Originally posted by cdtm
By stirring the pot further.A lot further.
If I was in charge, my tactic would be make people so angry they can't see straight, on the theory that it must eventually burn itself out. Anger is not infinite, human beings have an upper limit, throw a tantrum, and burn themselves out, as any parent knows.
Gold Slorg has said something similar. He's mocking the situation, of course.
Oh, and Silent Master, too: let them implement all of their terrible ideas. Let the US burn. It'd tucker them out, people would realize that we don't want gulags in the US, and we'd go back to sane politics.