Ultron vs. Nam-Ek

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes there is, this has already been explained to you.
Your opinion is noted
That didn't answer my question
Nam has no feats of generating "great heat".

Originally posted by h1a8
No proof was given. No where in the movie did Ultron say he was made of vibranium. Tony speculated and asked, but how can a question be proof?

Proof was given, this has already been explained to you.

I cant find a single video of Ultron knocking Hulk around.

Originally posted by Sable
I cant find a single video of Ultron knocking Hulk around.

Silent is talking about something else. I was mistaken about Ultron fighting them which I have no problem admitting. Everything else I said is correct though.

Fair enough

Originally posted by Silent Master
Proof was given, this has already been explained to you.

The only thing that was given was the words of posters. No clips or videos explaining or showing that Ultron is undoubtedly made of Vibranium.

Originally posted by h1a8
The only thing that was given was the words of posters. No clips or videos explaining or showing that Ultron is undoubtedly made of Vibranium.

This has already been explained to you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
This has already been explained to you.

Spamming the thread with trolling again you are.

Tony asked Ultron (not stated) was he made of a vibranium cocktail.
Ultron didn't answer. This is not proof.

Stating what an actor (not writer) said in an interview IS NOT PROOF.
1. The poster could be lying or misinterpreting things. Post the clip as evidence.
2. Character interviews are inadmissible as evidence.

Originally posted by h1a8
Spamming the thread with trolling again you are.

Tony asked Ultron (not stated) was he made of a vibranium cocktail.
Ultron didn't answer. This is not proof.

Stating what an actor (not writer) said in an interview IS NOT PROOF.
1. The poster could be lying or misinterpreting things. Post the clip as evidence.
2. Character interviews are inadmissible as evidence.

It's very interesting that you're ignoring the person that actually posted the evidence, is it because you know that he'll destroy you in a debate?

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's very interesting that you're ignoring the person that actually posted the evidence, is it because you know that he'll destroy you in a debate?

Ok so what I stated wasn't what the person you are referring to stated.
Tell who posted the evidence or what page is is located on or just quote them. I must have missed it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Ok so what I stated wasn't what the person you are referring to stated.
Tell who posted the evidence or what page is is located on or just quote them. I must have missed it.

This thread only has 2 pages, find it yourself.

Nam-Ek should win after awhile