Originally posted by Beniboybling
That post was directed you as well bro, given it was you who triggered my response in the first place. 😕
Originally posted by Beniboybling
On the other hand, even my most fierce admirers would struggle to argue that this:
Constituted a butt-blasting that ejected your testicles from your eye sockets....
Originally posted by cdtmthis is the "things guilty white people say" thread
Hrmm..Not so sure if that really qualifies or not. Yes, implying only jews are good attorney's is bigoted..
Otoh, there's undeniably a glut of jewish folk in the legal profession, and as a class they're undoubtably successful...
And heck, part of Jewish culture is pride in the debate, along with a focus on education. Ask any rabbi, they'll tell you the same with pride. You'd want someone who excels at arguing as your attorney, wouldn't you?
as such, i think a guilty white person would do well to have a highly qualified (jewish) attorney
it was a sort of attempt at a joke, though apparently not a very successful one
@Nemebro The fact remains that I didn't respond because I didn't see his post, not because I got assblasted or whatever. That was from the week in which I was in a national park where I only had my phone and very limited internet access.
And none of this changes the fact that you are holding me and Robtard to very different standards based on your closer ideological alignment with Robtard, or the fact that you claim that me citing examples of discriminatory policies that are public knowledge is somehow me making unsubstantiated claims.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
@Nemebro The fact remains that I didn't respond because I didn't see his post, not because I got assblasted or whatever. That was from the week in which I was in a national park where I only had my phone and very limited internet access.And none of this changes the fact that you are holding me and Robtard to very different standards based on your closer ideological alignment with Robtard, or the fact that you claim that me citing examples of discriminatory policies that are public knowledge is somehow me making unsubstantiated claims.
Um, question then: Why did you accuse me of dodging your post when here you are going "I didn't see!" defense? Couldn't it have been possible that I didn't see your post?
Regardless of the truth that I saw it, saw it was silly empty claims and the since you didn't quote or name me, I didn't assume that silly post was directed at me.