Baraka-pool vs Loki...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
I don't agree with that at all...

Some metals give the appearance of different levels of sheen pending the angle its at when light falls on it...

Deadpools skeleton is in motion pretty much the entire fight, so the level of reflectivity (or rather its appearance) seen in any given part of it would vary pending its position relative to the light sources falling upon it...

So, I still content that Barakapools entire skeleton is Adamantium...

The movies wiki says it is as well: http://xmenmovies.wikia.com/wiki/X-Men_Origins:_Wolverine

"Panicking, Stryker prematurely activates his newest creation, Weapon XI, a bald, pale-skinned and deformed Wade Wilson, lacking a mouth and with patterns on his skin marking his adamantium bone structure."

Correct, lighting will change how an object looks and what its color is yeah? Which means you can't use that shot as proof because, as you said, it is distorted. Meaning it's unclear and thus can't be used to prove anything.

So then why don't we go back to that one picture that had a clear shot at his skull under decent lighting... where it showed a white-grey color?

You keep trying to dodge around that? And FYI, in MvF on screen feats trump whatever wiki page you're bringing up.

That's clearly bone. Get your eyes checked.

Well we agree to disagree about Baraka-pools skeleton...

Anyway, 6-3...KMC has spoken...Baraka-pool wins.

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Well we agree to disagree about Baraka-pools skeleton...

Anyway, 6-3...KMC has spoken...Baraka-pool wins.

Yup. Take the easy way out instead of admitting that the screenshot clearly shows bone.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yup. Take the easy way out instead of admitting that the screenshot clearly shows bone.

Funny, he only seems to cares about the polls when they agree with him.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yup. Take the easy way out instead of admitting that the screenshot clearly shows bone.

Not taking the easy way out; I'm just acknowledging the fact that we are not going to agree on the composition of Baraka-pools skeleton...

The only thing to consider at this point in the debate is the voting, and Baraka has a majority vote...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder

The movies wiki says it is as well: http://xmenmovies.wikia.com/wiki/X-Men_Origins:_Wolverine

"Panicking, Stryker prematurely activates his newest creation, Weapon XI, a bald, pale-skinned and deformed Wade Wilson, lacking a mouth and with patterns on his skin marking his adamantium bone structure."

Since you're using the wiki LoM, that means according to the source yiu want to use, Barakapoop only has adamantium where those black tattoos are on his skin yes?

I see no markings on his skull.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Funny, he only seems to cares about the polls when they agree with him.

Not true at all...

Voting without a reasonable argument invalidates a poll...

This thread, though, features reasonable arguments on both sides, so the voting is valid...

So at the moment, this valid thread sits at 6-3 in favor of Baraka-pool...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Not true at all...

Voting without a reasonable argument invalidates a poll...

This thread, though, features reasonable arguments on both sides, so the voting is valid...

So at the moment, this valid thread sits at 6-3 in favor of Baraka-pool...

In that case, since nobody has made a reasonable argument for how Pool is going to beat someone that can use illusions and turn invisible. by your own standards, This poll is invalid.

Originally posted by KingD19
Since you're using the wiki LoM, that means according to the source yiu want to use, Barakapoop only has adamantium where those black tattoos are on his skin yes?

I see no markings on his skull.

Those tats demonstrate some of his bone structure, but as the following pic demonstrates, they don't demonstrate all of it:

Originally posted by Silent Master
In that case, since nobody has made a reasonable argument for how Pool is going to beat someone that can use illusions and turn invisible. by your own standards, This poll is invalid.

Someone has argued (reasonably imo) that Baraka will win despite what Loki brings to the table...

So yeah, in my minds eye, the poll is very valid...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Those tats demonstrate some of his bone structure, but as the following pic demonstrates, they don't demonstrate all of it:

So you'll even go so far as to say the very source you cited for your argument isn't correct, but it's still correct enough for you to use if you put your own spin on it. Gotcha.

Wow man.

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Someone has argued (reasonably imo) that Baraka will win despite what Loki brings to the table...

So yeah, in my minds eye, the poll is very valid...

Do explain though how he wins if Loki stays invisible, and uses his illusions were are lifelike enough to trick people into thinking they're actually interacting with Loki himself?

Originally posted by KingD19
So you'll even go so far as to say the very source you cited for your argument isn't correct, but it's still correct enough for you to use if you put your own spin on it. Gotcha.

Wow man.

The source is correct in that he does have adamantium where he has tats...

But he also has adamantium in places not covered by the tats as the above pic shows...

So my source is correct...

Originally posted by KingD19
Do explain though how he wins if Loki stays invisible, and uses his illusions were are lifelike enough to trick people into thinking they're actually interacting with Loki himself?

There is no time limit in this fight...

Baraka will get him eventually; Loki cant put him down and Loki will attack eventually...

It might take a while, but I'm convinced that Baraka will defeat Loki...

The source doesn't say he has Adamantium where there aren't markings. If he did, why would the wiki point out that the markings show where his skeleton is, instead of just saying he has a skeleton?

The only reason they'd differentiate is because he doesn't have it where he doesn't have markings. You'll probably come up with some bullshit reason why that logic isn't sound though. Probably involves Future Sentinels.

Originally posted by KingD19
The source doesn't say he has Adamantium where there aren't markings. If he did, why would the wiki point out that the markings show where his skeleton is, instead of just saying he has a skeleton?

The only reason they'd differentiate is because he doesn't have it where he doesn't have markings. You'll probably come up with some bullshit reason why that logic isn't sound though. Probably involves Future Sentinels.

LoL!!!

😂

Leave my Sentinels out of this...

😠

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Someone has argued (reasonably imo) that Baraka will win despite what Loki brings to the table...

So yeah, in my minds eye, the poll is very valid...

I disagree, therefore by your standards, this poll is invalid.

LoM, you cited a video clip as proof of his bone structure. I then took snapshots from said clip to prove his skull is made of bone and not adamantium.

Then you go ahead and cite a wiki page. Kingd then points out that the wiki only states that his adamantium lacing coincides with his tattooes.

You're digging your own grave here man. And there are far more than just 3 people who are stating Loki wins in this match. Which means the poll is inaccurate since clearly there are people who didn't vote. I know I didn't. I've now corrected that.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I disagree, therefore by your standards, this poll is invalid.

You can disagree all you want, it wont change my opinion of this poll...