Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDit's almost as if I never argued regarding his ability to take 5 banes
You do not understand the realities of that fight.Tenebrae is not a stranger to contending with strike team(s) of well-armed (and powerful) opponents so why would he fail to tackle 5x Darth Banes?
If this was a lightsaber duel, I would argue that 5x Darth Banes might be too much for a single individual. But this is not.
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
None of the strike teams Valkorion has faced, is anywhere near 5 Banes, lal.
👆
Valk stomped four Jedi. Yeah, they're elite, but five Banes are much better. One Bane is much better than all those Jedi individually.
Valk stomped twelve Dark Councilors, but they're not above five Banes. They're all featless.
Goes on and on.
Valkorion dies if he acts stupid again, but he can win on pure power alone. I honestly have no clue what this obsession with the strength of numbers that some people here have is.
If character A can one-shot character B, what difference does it make if there are two or three B's? How does the added amount of B's change the fact that each of them are one-shot material? If A one-shots a B, how are his equally weak comrades going to stop that from happening? If they get in the way of the attack, they die themselves. All A has to do is fire the amount of Force attacks that there are B's.
Is Valkorion unable to fire five Force attacks? Is that what people like Deronn are saying here? Or do they think a single Bane is powerful enough not to get one-shot? I'm open to both possibilities, but I'd still like an explanation.