Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You've clearly never seen the chat of a Trader on a terminal.
Yup, sure do. They don't talk like this. This is why your post was confusing. "The Fed" or "FR" is one example. There are lots of Central Banks especially if you're talking about international options and markets (which is likely).
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
QE = Quantitative Easing. CB = Central Banks.
If that is what you meant, then your post should have been written like this:
"Due to liquidity* and new-QE** from the CB, we are seeing ATHs." Even then, I would disagree with this statement. It's clearly an oversimplification. You agree, right?
Also, I've never read the Federal Reserve as "CB" in any chat or website. It's referred to "The Fed" specifically to differentiate it from other CBs. BoE (Bank of England, BoJ (Bank of Japan), etc.
*Which markets? The FR purchasing a shitload of securities does not translate to all markets benefiting.
**These are short term securities, as well.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Multiples refers to price. Most commonly, P/E multiple. Stock prices are being pushed up continuously higher, but not because of good news that shows an improvement in the value of the business.
"Multiples" is not the issue. It was the portion I quoted that is the issue (It had odd initialisms and weird ways of wording stuff).
Multiples is usually a reference to earnings per share vs. stock price. It's a ratio. And I've never seen any ratio used but the P/E ratio...but they exist.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
That's not true at all....
Oh boy...
Inflated stock prices has been a thing forever. It's always a problem. I don't understand why you would disagree with this.
To put it in different words: overvalued stocks. Which you just agreed with but started off by saying you disagreed with it.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Over a long enough-time frame (Whether you choose 1926 or 1962), we can see that atm, prices are arguably inflated.
atm = ass to mouth, by the way.
👆
Also, you just agreed with me. I don't understand why you disagreed, earlier.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
We're on the tail-end of a 10-year bull run so the need of a correction is expected but we've never had this much liquidity being injected by central bankers or interest rates this low for such a sustained period in an expanding economy.
So what's the real reason, detailed reason, for the record highs and the crash from Monday to today?