Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you @ss.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Don't act like it "was just too soon" when you've already made it clear that you won't EVER condem them no matter what. You're simply using the girls death as a way to shield them from criticism for their actions.
Did I? By all means, exercise the quote feature.
But use that to distract from the fact that you were deflecting from Nazis to Anti-Fa before the body of the victim was even cold.
Originally posted by darthgoober
But when I said the guy was a piece of shit you accused me of derailing the thread... if we're not supposed to condem the guy then what are we supposed to talk about? Give me an example of what would be appropriate to say without being accused of derailing the thread.
im not the ****ing moderator. you accused me of not posting a topic when the topic is plainly stated in the OP.
it's pretty clear that its very very important to you that we dont discuss the terrorist attack. #noted.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Did I? By all means, exercise the quote feature.But use that to distract from the fact that you were deflecting from Nazis to Anti-Fa before the body of the victim was even cold.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I could not care less about Anti-Fa. Conservatives only raise the subject as a "both sides have violent groups" deflection, or a "defend this, so I do not have to defend that" distraction. Anything to change the subject, so they do not have to defend the indefensible, or to muddy the conversational waters, to argue to a draw. The problem is that Anti-Fa is neither an albatross or a sacred cow for progressives, so it does not work.
Originally posted by darthgoober
But you accused me of derailing when I tried to address the topic... again, what's an example of something that can be said without being accused of derailing the topic?I did discuss the terrorist attack, I said the guy was a piece of shit. What more would you like me to say about it?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's pretty clear that its very very important to you that we dont discuss the terrorist attack. #noted.
Originally posted by darthgoober[QUOTE=16294553]Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Did I? By all means, exercise the quote feature.But use that to distract from the fact that you were deflecting from Nazis to Anti-Fa before the body of the victim was even cold.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE[/QUOTE]
I could not care less about Anti-Fa. Conservatives only raise the subject as a "both sides have violent groups" deflection, or a "defend this, so I do not have to defend that" distraction. Anything to change the subject, so they do not have to defend the indefensible, or to muddy the conversational waters, to argue to a draw. The problem is that Anti-Fa is neither an albatross or a sacred cow for progressives, so it does not work.
Where is the part I "make it clear I won't EVER condemn them no matter what"?
I only see me saying that Anti-Fa is so inconsequential to me that I do not care what becomes of them.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i think we're just going to have to fashion all out towns centers and cities with barricades to prevent this or at least minimize casualties.what else can we do but ban driving and go full-autonomous vehicles.
Originally posted by Adam_PoEWhere is the part I "make it clear I won't EVER condemn them no matter what"?
I only see me saying that Anti-Fa is so inconsequential to me that I do not care what becomes of them.
I didn't say you said it, I said you made it clear. You seem to have gone out of the way to avoid saying it while still making it known in fact.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
time square has concrete pylons. also these little guys are quite effective and cost-efficient. any area that a lot of people gather should be protected from these kinds attacks. we just have to give a shit, is all.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i think we're just going to have to fashion all out towns centers and cities with barricades to prevent this or at least minimize casualties.what else can we do but ban driving and go full-autonomous vehicles.
Don't you see thats why this vehicle obsession has taken over? Since they can't ban guns, they want to cram us all in mega cities with driverless cars.
Originally posted by darthgoober
It would mean tearing up the sidewalk/road anytime a large group wanted to assemble.
#1 you just leave them there and there's probably removable ones as well if the constant sight of it offends the locals.
#2 i should have said "any area that a lot of people typically gather should be protected from these kinds attacks".
i was not suggesting that they should have to follow the march with a cement mixer and a jackhammer.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#1 you just leave them there and there's probably removable ones as well if the constant sight of it offends the locals.#2 i should have said "any area that a lot of people typically gather should be protected from these kinds attacks".
i was not suggesting that they should have to follow the march with a cement mixer and a jackhammer.
Remember in Lucy, how she controlled those guard rails when the police were chasing her? We need those all over. They can go up when there is busy events and busy times in city centers and such, and come down when not needed.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#1 you just leave them there and there's probably removable ones as well if the constant sight of it offends the locals.#2 i should have said "any area that a lot of people typically gather should be protected from these kinds attacks".
i was not suggesting that they should have to follow the march with a cement mixer and a jackhammer.