Wil democrats demand Trump denounce Islamic Terrorism?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
as i said, you refused to label it as a terrorist attack and refused to let people even discuss it. /fact

Bashy Logic. Its only TERRORISM when WHITE People get together and form a Parade.

DURP DEE DOOO!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
such pure concentrated hypocrisy in one sentence. have fun with yout word games.

muslim attack = terrorism
antifa punches nazi in the nose and/or hurts his fee-fees = terrorism
right wing murder spreee = isolated incident, troubled individual, both sides do it, very sad.

What the person did was terrorism, I never said it wasn't, so stop lying. I also said it was sad she died, and said the 4chan people were wrong. So you lied. I called them a bunch of losers and said nazis were nutcases.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
such pure concentrated hypocrisy in one sentence. have fun with yout word games.

muslim attack = terrorism
antifa punches nazi in the nose and/or hurts his fee-fees = terrorism
right wing murder spreee = isolated incident, troubled individual, both sides do it, very sad.

Fixed this for you:

Muslim attack is Terrorism
Antifa beating the crap out of people in pursuit of politics agenda is terrorism: see terrorism definition
Right wing Murder spreee in the name of a political agenda is terrorism: see terrorism definition

have fun deliberately misrepresenting people, snake.

Originally posted by Sable
You can call it terrorism is calling it terrorism. Lets stop playing word games. Trump denounced all the Nazi, KKK and White Supremacists. Just stop.

Saying "you can call it" means the person speaking doesn't necessarily hold that belief, just that they have no problem with you doing so. If he was serious, he would have flat out called it an act of terrorism.

As I told your buddy Surtur the other day when he tried his usual ODS nonsense and then dodged and waited for the page to turn instead of admitting he was wrong, Obama flat out called ISIS a "brutal, vicious death cult", that's not skirting around the issue, that's full blown condemnation

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
have fun deliberately misrepresenting people, snake.

No thats not what I did, I didn't change anything you said. I changed what you tried to accuse me of, and inputted my actual thoughts. And its very telling you can't condemn this attack as islamic terrorism.

Originally posted by Robtard
Saying "you can call it" means the person speaking doesn't necessarily hold that belief, just that they have no problem with you doing so. If he was serious, he would have flat out called it an act of terrorism.

As I told your buddy Surtur the other day when he tried his usual ODS nonsense and then dodged and waited for the page to turn instead of admitting he was wrong, Obama flat out called ISIS a "brutal, vicious death cult", that's not skirting around the issue, that's full blown condemnation

Now that you are on the other side of the coin, with your president refusing to call something terrorism, how does it feel. We dealt with it for 8 years.

Trump flat out called the KKK, Nazis despicable and horrible people.

Originally posted by Sable
Now that you are on the other side of the coin, with your president refusing to call something terrorism, how does it feel. We dealt with it for 8 years.

Trump flat out called the KKK, Nazis despicable and horrible people.

Repeat: Except Obama called terrorist acts "terrorism", flat out. So there is no other side of the coin as you imply.

Trump did and then he didn't with his antics. It's why David Duke and other White Supremacist were thanking him.

He did not. He refused to call many acts of terrorism, terrorism. Sometimes he never even talked about it.

Since you have told me me numerous times when I bring up louis farrakhan that he is an irrelevant yahoo, why is it now, somehow David Duke is relevant?

Trump has never called right-wing terrorism what it is, while never failing to label it as terrorism when they're brown and muslim.
keep deflecting the point though, so that you can claim another empty victory. have fun with that, champ.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Trump has never called right-wing terrorism what it is, while never failing to label it as terrorism when they're brown. keep deflecting the point though, so that you can claim another empty victory. have fun with that, champ.

You lied, you said Trump has not denounced the attack, he did. Why did you lie?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
have fun deliberately misrepresenting people, snake.

I like it.

Originally posted by Sable
He did not. He refused to call many acts of terrorism, terrorism. Sometimes he never even talked about it.

Since you have told me me numerous times when I bring up louis farrakhan that he is an irrelevant yahoo, why is it now, somehow David Duke is relevant?

Oh my. No speaking to you when your ODS is on.

Huh? I've said Farrakhan is a loony bastard and a pile of shit. But as noted, I can't recall a time when the NoI committed a terrorist attack. Am I wrong? What does this have to do with anything though?

Originally posted by Sable
You lied, you said Trump has not denounced the attack, he did. Why did you lie?

he denounced it as someone being "killed", not as an act of terrorism, you snake.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he denounced it as someone being "killed", not an act of terrorism, you snake.

No he denounced the groups involved, and said it was cold blooded murder and that it can be called terrorism, liar.

And yet you two always clam up about Calypso Louie when ever he starts spouting some real racist hate speech.

Oh wiat I fergits..."WHITE PEOPLE!"

Originally posted by Sable
No he denounced the groups involved, and said it was cold blooded murder and that it can be called terrorism, liar.

keep avoiding the point and typing out your silly word-games.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh my. No speaking to you when your ODS is on.

Huh? I've said Farrakhan is a loony bastard and a pile of shit. But as noted, I can't recall a time when the NoI committed a terrorist attack. Am I wrong? What does this have to do with anything though?

When did David Duke commit terrorism, and why is he more relevant than Farrakhan, whom has a larger following and voice in the anti Semitic movement then Duke does. David Duke has like 30-40k followers on twitter, I think Farrakhan has close to half million.

So why is Duke more relevant to a racist movement then Farrakhan?

As noted, the point is that Trump did and didn't condemn, it's why they were emboldened. How if he had called White Supremacist a "vicious death cult", then they'd likely not have thanked Trump.

BTW, here's the quote:

You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder. You can call it whatever you want. I would just call it as the fastest one to come up with a good verdict, that’s what I would call it... The driver of the car is a murderer, and what he did is a horrible, horrible, inexcusable thing. -Trump

That's not Trump calling it terrorism, he's calling it "murder".

He did condemn it, I wont accuse you or lying, but its not right to say he didn't.

I don't understand how you are not satisfied with this statement.

You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder. You can call it whatever you want. I would just call it as the fastest one to come up with a good verdict, that’s what I would call it... The driver of the car is a murderer, and what he did is a horrible, horrible, inexcusable thing. -Trump

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/14/politics/trump-condemns-charlottesville-attackers/index.html