Originally posted by SurturWoods' response was an ad hominem attack. Literally a "ur dad's lucifer" joke. It did nothing to actually address her point, likely because he's not intelligent enough to do so lol.
She was apparently refuting the "these statues are a part of history" argument.Yes, even James Woods responded and slapped her down for the tweet lol.
A random addressed it far better by pointing out that no, many churches do have depictions of Lucifer.
And don't say "her point was so dumb it didn't warrant a response". Don't be a phaggot bruh.