Originally posted by Robtard
They did at first, but they never tried comparing homosexuality with child-rapist and animal cornholers 👆
But when they did say it, it never landed them on the SPLC. If you want to think BC is a racist sexist xenophobic corn hole, thats up to you, but if thats what he believes who are we to say otherwise? Isn't that his right to believe what he wants?
Originally posted by Sable
But when they did say it, it never landed them on the SPLC. If you want to think BC is a racist sexist xenophobic corn hole, thats up to you, but if thats what he believes who are we to say otherwise? Isn't that his right to believe what he wants?
I can boil down what Ben said: marriage is between a man and a woman and no group no matter what gets to change the definition.
If he is such an extremist why did they remove him? I am so curious as to the excuse they will have for this lol.
Originally posted by Sable
But when they did say it, it never landed them on the SPLC. If you want to think BC is a racist sexist xenophobic corn hole, thats up to you, but if thats what he believes who are we to say otherwise? Isn't that his right to believe what he wants?
It was because he subtly compared homosexuality with child-rape and bestiality, that's a very extreme view. If he just said "gay marriage bad" like the rest, no one would have cared too much, just more of the same.
Sure, Carson's free to say all the crazy shit he believes, just like any other bigot is. Doesn't mean he gets a free pass and people don't call him on it.
Originally posted by Robtard
It was because he subtly compared homosexuality with child-rape and bestiality, that's a very extreme view. If he just said "gay marriage bad" like the rest, no one would have cared too much, just more of the same.Sure, Carson's free to say all the crazy shit he believes, just like any other bigot is. Doesn't mean he gets a free pass and people don't call him on it.
I hardly would call him a bigot. People literally get in trouble now for thinking anal sex is gross, its being called discrimination to think that way.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I never said that, but Rob since you seem to agree Ben SHOULD be on there, doesn't this make the SPLC still not trustworthy, since they removed him?
No, you just defend shit actions of others in a round about way and then blow your rape whistle when you get called out 👆
Originally posted by Robtard
No idea, I'd assume probably because he just said the one thing and enough people like you cried about it "but he's a doctor!!! Waahhh!!" . He's a turd, but he's hardly Hitler
Lol so let us say the silliness you just uttered was true, why should we trust the place if they bow to the whining of others and remove people who legitimately deserve to be on there?
Originally posted by Robtard
Better question: Why shouldn't we?
Because if we go by what you just said they are willing to remove people who deserve to be on there merely because people made a big enough stink about it. Meaning they have zero integrity.
EDIT: Let me put it another way Rob. If conservative pressure can get someone who belongs on there removed, why can't liberal pressure get someone who doesn't belong on there...put on?
Originally posted by Sable
But Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both said marriage was between a man and a woman and that never landed them on that list of the SPLC
The SPLC does not name individuals or groups to its anti-LGBT list for simply having biblical objections to homosexuality or for opposing same-sex marriage.
They earn that designation by propagation of known falsehoods about LGBT people, such as comparing them to people who have sex with children or animals.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The SPLC does not name individuals or groups to its anti-LGBT list for simply having biblical objections to homosexuality or for opposing same-sex marriage.They earn that designation by propagation of known falsehoods about LGBT people, such as comparing them to people who have sex with children or animals.
Why'd they remove Ben Carson?
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Because he gave an interview three days later saying he did not intend to draw that comparison. He effectively "took it back," so they followed suit.
Oh truly? So all one has to do to get removed is say "I didn't mean it"? Interesting.
EDIT: Out of curiosity, Ayaan Hirsi Ali...an extremist in your opinion?