Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says
Thanks CNN for keeping me informed about the latest in scientific experiments:
Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says
馃憜
Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says
Thanks CNN for keeping me informed about the latest in scientific experiments:
Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says
馃憜
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]That is funny coming from you Robbie. [/B]
It is hilarious how triggered they got over it lol. Even to the point of trying to say I didn't read the article, but I did.
I also read all the comments, which is how I know this was debunked already.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094715300517
Re: Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says
Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks CNN for keeping me informed about the latest in scientific experiments:
you clearly had no idea of what the article was really about. could have been easily construed if you read the first paragraph, but you knee-jerked at the headline as usual. cry harder tho. 馃檪
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Ahh the good old "Did Not/Did To"Classic Strat their Bashy!!!!
[/B]
I welcome them to quote anything I have said that indicates I did not read it. All I did was thank CNN for keeping me informed about the science of this.
Notice instead of discussing the validity of what is being claimed they just resorted to "triggered". Interesting.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you clearly had no idea of what the article was really about. could have been easily construed if you read the first paragraph, but you knee-jerked at the headline as usual. cry harder tho. 馃檪
But if you'd read the article you would know that at the end they claim what seals the deal are their experiments they conducted when they asked people a variety of questions.
Don't know why the phrase "scientific experiments" triggers you.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Would him saying something along the lines of "Nu HUH You quote ME" be good enough? [/B]
For people who act like they read the article...this is the headline for the second to last part:
"Study: Experiments back up the claim"
Spoiler alert: they asked people questions, like predicting the intensity of a hurricane based on the name only.
IOW: They science'd the shit out of this.
Originally posted by Surtur
But if you'd read the article you would know that at the end they claim what seals the deal are their experiments they conducted when they asked people a variety of questions.Don't know why the phrase "scientific experiments" triggers you.
then why does this article "amuse" you so? what is it that you find so worthy of ridicule? explain. 馃檪