Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says

Started by Surtur4 pages

Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says

Thanks CNN for keeping me informed about the latest in scientific experiments:

Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says

馃憜

#triggered

IF this were true wouldn't the "Eye" of the hurricanes be the worst part of the storm?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#triggered

And yes you are.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#triggered

Another instance where Surtur only read the title and not the story before kneejerking. Will he ever learn.

That is funny coming from you Robbie.

Originally posted by Robtard
Another instance where Surtur only read the title and not the story before kneejerking. Will he ever learn.

what a surprise, eh? oh well, better send in the flying monkeys to distract from yet another of surt's embarrassing episodes.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
what a surprise, eh? oh well, better send in the flying monkeys to distract from yet another of surt's embarrassing episodes.

*just looked at Bashy's new sig pic*

Well if anyone knows about Flying Monkeys....

my sig #triggered you? I'm sorry I'll go change it.

It triggered a laughing fit cause you got a pic of the 2nd WORST Star Wars Character EVER!!!!!!

But then you always did love your #2 don't ya Hammy!?

I mean Bashy!!!!

would this be less #triggering for you?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]That is funny coming from you Robbie. [/B]

It is hilarious how triggered they got over it lol. Even to the point of trying to say I didn't read the article, but I did.

I also read all the comments, which is how I know this was debunked already.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094715300517

Originally posted by Surtur
It is hilarious how triggered they got over it lol. Even to the point of trying to say I didn't read the article, but I did.

you obviously did not. how embarrassing for you.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you obviously did not. how embarrassing for you.

But I did. Continue to get triggered over it though.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you obviously did not. how embarrassing for you.
Ahh the good old "Did Not/Did To"

Classic Strat their Bashy!!!!

Re: Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes, study says

Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks CNN for keeping me informed about the latest in scientific experiments:

you clearly had no idea of what the article was really about. could have been easily construed if you read the first paragraph, but you knee-jerked at the headline as usual. cry harder tho. 馃檪

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Ahh the good old "Did Not/Did To"

Classic Strat their Bashy!!!! [/B]

I welcome them to quote anything I have said that indicates I did not read it. All I did was thank CNN for keeping me informed about the science of this.

Notice instead of discussing the validity of what is being claimed they just resorted to "triggered". Interesting.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you clearly had no idea of what the article was really about. could have been easily construed if you read the first paragraph, but you knee-jerked at the headline as usual. cry harder tho. 馃檪

But if you'd read the article you would know that at the end they claim what seals the deal are their experiments they conducted when they asked people a variety of questions.

Don't know why the phrase "scientific experiments" triggers you.

Would him saying something along the lines of "Nu HUH You quote ME" be good enough?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Would him saying something along the lines of "Nu HUH You quote ME" be good enough? [/B]

For people who act like they read the article...this is the headline for the second to last part:

"Study: Experiments back up the claim"

Spoiler alert: they asked people questions, like predicting the intensity of a hurricane based on the name only.

IOW: They science'd the shit out of this.

Originally posted by Surtur
But if you'd read the article you would know that at the end they claim what seals the deal are their experiments they conducted when they asked people a variety of questions.

Don't know why the phrase "scientific experiments" triggers you.

then why does this article "amuse" you so? what is it that you find so worthy of ridicule? explain. 馃檪