Guardians of the Galaxy 3 (2023)

Started by quanchi11262 pages

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

Set for a 2020 release. This could complete one of the best trilogies of all time.
Make mine Marvel.

http://screenrant.com/guardians-galaxy-3-release-date-2020/

Oh? Its supposed to only be a "Trilogy" now?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Oh? Its supposed to only be a "Trilogy" now?

[/B]

That James Gunn is going to direct so far... apparently.

Who is James Gunn

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
Who is James Gunn

Get with it, old man.

Loved Vol1. Vol2 was good but a step down. Hoping Vol3 goes back and captures the soul of Vol1.

Don't expect it though, with the exception of Cap2, all MCU squeals have been inferior compared to their original films. Though it's looking like Thor3 will deliver here like Cap2 did.

So is Yondu coming back or why is he shown?

I really liked 1, I really liked 2, I'm sure I'll really like 3.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Get with it, old man.

well you will be dead soon so.. bye bye...

Nooooo! Can't be Grumpy if you are dead 🙁

meh.

Originally posted by Robtard
Vol2 was good but a step down.

Don't agree.

Originally posted by Surtur
So is Yondu coming back or why is he shown?

He's dead.

Vol. 2 is better on second viewing. Probably even better on 3rd viewing, but haven't gotten there yet. Yes, it feels a little clunkier and forced than Vol. 1, but it's still good.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Probably even better on 3rd viewing, but haven't gotten there yet.

It is. Imho.

But you need to see for yourself.

Eh, I like 2, but I do think it was a step down. For all the good it has, it does bad too. I don't think it's even on the same level as the 1st one, but it's still better than the weaker Marvel movies. I do hope 3 is better though, as I was a big fan of the first one.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Eh, I like 2, but I do think it was a step down.

Ok... but, why, Pr?

I can agree that the music was inferior (with the exception of Brandy).

But what else? It was a great movie. If it had been the same as #1, you would've criticized it more.

Not saying you're wrong, just want to hear the details.

The forced humor, Baby Groot and a weak first half are what dragged it down for me.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Ok... but, why, Pr?

I can agree that the music was inferior (with the exception of Brandy).

But what else? It was a great movie. If it had been the same as #1, you would've criticized it more.

Not saying you're wrong, just want to hear the details.

Some massive tonal shifts bothered me. I thought they were far too heavy-handed with the jokes, going further than they really needed to. I thought Yondu's arc, while good by the end, felt kinda rushed. ****ing Pacman and that stupid Superman fight.

Also, the gold race really felt like they were only put in so they could do the whole Adam Warlock reveal at the end.

There is plenty about the movie that I like, mind you. It was really entertaining and I wasn't exactly annoyed about it. I just don't think it lives up to the first in terms of writing and the like.

I did like Kurt Russell though. And Baby Groot.

I liked Star Lord and he IMO is one of the overall best characters in the MCU.

Yondu was a standout and Kurt Russell was really good.

Villains is one the things the MCU has improved on. Now if they can dial down the forced humor in Infinity War I will be a happy man.

The shitty taste on this board.