Kenichi vs Himura Kenshin

According to Death Battle, moving/attacking faster then the eye can see is a far faster speed feat then slicing a bullet in half 😕

So I guess Kenshin >>>>> Matrix agents?

Who wins?

Kenshin can also cut bullets in half though.

Kenichi isn't taking any wins from a master swordsman.

Kenshin's refusal to kill and usage of a blunt katana do doom him here. Kenichi's gauntlets can block swings from Master class swordsmen who make Hiko Seijuro look like a ninety pound weakling. He could likely tank a swing from Kenshin's blunt sword with his body and be fine. He wins.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Kenshin can also cut bullets in half though.

Oh, I don't doubt that. Thought it was funny Death Battle actually called that slow.

In the recent Shredder vs Silver Samurai fight, with Harada the one who sliced a bullet in half.

First time I've ever heard a "faster then sight" feat argued as >>> bullet time, and I used to hang out on CBR a lot, where relatively rare bullet time feats were king and every street worth their salt from Batman to Wolverine had "Faster then sight" feats..

Originally posted by vansonbee
Kenichi isn't taking any wins from a master swordsman.

You're joking right?

Kenichi would demolish Kenshin in a fight. One of kenishi's master is master of all bladed weapons. Though Kenichi sucks at sword play, he knows how to fight against them.

Not only that, Kenishi has multiple variants of fighting styles to rely on. Worse yet, if he disarmed Kenshin, Kenshin won't last a minute against him.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Kenshin can also cut bullets in half though.

I like the resurgence of Kenichi in this thread though I get the feeling he's been gravely underestimated.

With that said Kenshin should be faster or at the very least have better reaction time considering Kenichi was never able to bullet time even by his Kajima fight.