Afro Cheese
Senior Member
Originally posted by BackFire
Well since people overstaying visas make up a bigger portion of the illegal immigrant population than does those who enter illegally across the bordered, dealing with that somehow would probably help more than building a wall.
How would you deal with that? This is also another one of those things that aren't really directly related to border security. So it might be a good idea, but it's hardly an
alternative to the border wall. I say this because, to me, the fact that cartels use the unsecured border as a primary way for trafficking goods and people across is more troubling to me than people overstaying their visas.
As for security on the physical border goes, I think any number of things would be more efficient than just building a wall.-Increase the number of border agents and improve their training, and maybe higher pay.
-Improve their tools and the tech used by them to help them find and flush out the various tunnels that get used to transport people/drugs across the border.
-Improving/strengthening the fencing that already exists and has been placed in strategically important places for years.
Well, I don't actually know if that would be more efficient. The border is massive, and the first two options could actually end up being extremely costly. The last option seems remarkably similar to building a wall, only in certain locations. Either way, I thank you for at least attempting to answer the question.
Let me also be clear, so I don't hear any more crap from Adam: I'm not saying that if you don't have a better idea then that means the wall is a good idea. I just want to understand clearly what our options are. If our options are 1.) build the wall or 2.) do nothing, then I might be more willing to give the wall a try. So yes, it is relevant what other ideas are on the table for dealing with border security. Unless you are of the mindset that we don't really have much of a problem to deal with.