Originally posted by Sable
The sexism part was a joke,
Originally posted by Sable
the stupid part is the need for the article.
Originally posted by SableLike I said, Yahoo answers
Criticizing her for dressing up for a WH event even though previously that day she was down in Florida with the hurricane victims.
Originally posted by Sable
That is true, I thought the democrats were the intellectual civilized culture and the republicans were the uncouth nativists.
No, that's just the narrative some people claimed the Democrats as a collective say/believe and then attack Democrats over that imagined belief. It's straw-ish.
Originally posted by SurturIt's weird how you can laugh about one rich person (Kim Kardashian in this case) literally being robbed of their riches, but defend another rich person's exorbitantly expensive attire. What happened to "deep down they look down on us" my man?
I don't get why the price of her dress matters? They are rich, it's not like they spent tax dollars on it. First her shoes, now her dress. I think maybe some are mad she is far more attractive than the last first lady.
Originally posted by NemeBro
It's weird how you can laugh about one rich person (Kim Kardashian in this case) literally being robbed of their riches, but defend another rich person's exorbitantly expensive attire. What happened to "deep down they look down on us" my man?
Originally posted by NemeBro
It's weird how you can laugh about one rich person (Kim Kardashian in this case) literally being robbed of their riches, but defend another rich person's exorbitantly expensive attire. What happened to "deep down they look down on us" my man?
I don't find it weird at all. I'm saying don't whine about how expensive her things are.
Though it's a step up from whining about what shoes she may or may not wear to Texas. A baby step, but a step. Feel free to continue to talk about Kim K if you want.