Ben Shapiro at Berkley.

Originally posted by Surtur
Where is the problem? Oh and it was mostly peaceful because the cops actually did their jobs. 600 grand was spent on security.

If you knew anything about Ben you know he could indeed attack her political views and he does indeed attack the views of the left in the video.

Also, why does her gender matter? Would it have been different if he'd said it about a man?

Then stop whining. There's a riot, you whine. There's no riot, you whine about cost.

Despite not sucking on Ben's dick like you do now that your other heroes like Milo, Tomi and Bill O'Reilly have fallen in disgrace, I know more about Ben than you do. I regularly read his articles on the Daily Wire, smug one.

It shouldn't and he wouldn't have attacked her looks if she were a fluffed, injected, pulled and spray tanned man like Trump. That's the point, sport.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I mean, the fact that Berkeley is so filled with violent regressives $600,000 needed to be spent on security, and that the university offered special counseling sessions for any hurt by his speech.

Like that's pathetic. The university is permissive of and is inculcating some very regressive attitudes and behaviors. In elementary, middle, and high school, the only time special counseling was offered for a specific situation is when students at my high school died in a ****ing car crash, and yet you have a university offering counseling for anyone emotionally hurt by a speech they didn't attend? This is truly pathetic.

I'm actually pretty pleased with Berkeley for actually allowing the cops to do their jobs and taking the potential threat of these violent ideologues seriously, but that doesn't change the fact that it's apparent UC Berkeley is inculcating regressive attitudes.

And remember as Ben says, he spoke at Berkeley early in 2016 and they didn't need to spend *anywhere* near that much money on security.

Originally posted by Robtard
Then stop whining. There's a riot, you whine. There's no riot, you whine about cost.

Despite not sucking on Ben's dick like you do now that your other heroes like Milo, Tomi and Bill O'Reilly have fallen in disgrace, I know more about Ben than you do. I regularly read his articles on the Daily Wire, smug one.

It shouldn't and he wouldn't have attacked her looks if she were a fluffed, injected, pulled and spray tanned man like Trump. That's the point, sport.

Lol it is hilarious how much this triggered you. Just read your post out loud to yourself.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I mean, the fact that Berkeley is so filled with violent regressives $600,000 needed to be spent on security, and that the university offered special counseling sessions for any hurt by his speech.

Like that's pathetic. The university is permissive of and is inculcating some very regressive attitudes and behaviors. In elementary, middle, and high school, the only time special counseling was offered for a specific situation is when students at my high school died in a ****ing car crash, and yet you have a university offering counseling for anyone emotionally hurt by a speech they didn't attend? This is truly pathetic.

I'm actually pretty pleased with Berkeley for actually allowing the cops to do their jobs and taking the potential threat of these violent ideologues seriously, but that doesn't change the fact that it's apparent UC Berkeley is inculcating regressive attitudes.

As longs as you got to say "regressives" a few times

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol it is hilarious how much this triggered you. Just read your post out loud to yourself.

Good job dodging all my points 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
Good job dodging all my points 👆

I don't need to dodge them, you are just that triggered. Ben took a shot at Trump too lol. Specifically, at Trumps appearance. At the same event no less lol.

IOW: "There was no riot at Berkeley and this makes me mad!"

^Trumper phenotypes in this thread

No Rob, IOW you look like a damn fool because he attacked both the looks of Pelosi and Trump in the same lecture lol. Which is something you said he wouldn't do because you apparently know his stuff so well.

Originally posted by Robtard
As longs as you got to say "regressives" a few times

And I'm not Flytractor, you shouldn't interpret this statement from me as an attack on the left as a whole, there is a very clear distinction to be drawn between those who are on the left and are willing to participate in civilized discussion, and those who will either commit violence or have an emotional breakdown instead. I am not attacking you or making some blanket castigation of anyone on the left, so there is no need to get defensive about these types of people.

Originally posted by Surtur
No Rob, *whining ensues*

^Trumpers hoping/praying "Antifa" would riot so they could whine about it and then have to settle for whining about security cost

Lol...wake up with bed bugs or something today Rob?

More like the Bedbugs woke up with Robbie.

Course Antifa is probably treading very carefully now. Especially now that they are now Legally Labeled as TERRORISTS!!!!!! Won't be the cops coming for them. I it will be The National Guard.

Gawd how I would love to see that.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]More like the Bedbugs woke up with Robbie.

Course Antifa is probably treading very carefully now. Especially now that they are now Legally Labeled as TERRORISTS!!!!!! Won't be the cops coming for them. I it will be The National Guard.

Gawd how I would love to see that. [/B]

I just love how Rob says Ben wouldn't attack a spray tanned man like Trump and in the video Ben literally refers to Trump as the "orange guy" lol.

So yes, he took a shot at Trumps appearance as well. Epic failure at trying to imply sexism 👆

Rob is RACIST against orange people.

But then the Left are the creators of RACISM so ...

Originally posted by Robtard
Despite not sucking on Ben's dick like you do now that your other heroes like Milo, Tomi and Bill O'Reilly have fallen in disgrace . . .

Do not forget about Sargon. It would not be a conservative YouTube personality bukkake party without him. I honestly have not seen so many dudes with the not-gays hanging on every word another guy says. It is like they cannot form an coherent thoughts on their own, and they need these guys as surrogates to articulate their thoughts for them.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol...wake up with bed bugs or something today Rob?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]More like the Bedbugs woke up with Robbie.

Course Antifa is probably treading very carefully now. Especially now that they are now Legally Labeled as TERRORISTS!!!!!! Won't be the cops coming for them. I it will be The National Guard.

Gawd how I would love to see that. [/B]

Originally posted by Surtur
I just love how Rob says Ben wouldn't attack a spray tanned man like Trump and in the video Ben literally refers to Trump as the "orange guy" lol.

So yes, he took a shot at Trumps appearance as well. Epic failure at trying to imply sexism 👆

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Rob is RACIST against orange people.

But then the Left are the creators of RACISM so ... [/B]

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Do not forget about Sargon. It would not be a conservative YouTube personality bukkake party without him. I honestly have not seen so many dudes with the not-gays hanging on every word another guy says. It is like they cannot form an coherent thoughts on their own, and they need these guys as surrogates to articulate their thoughts for them.

These types of people/personalities definitely loves to step in line and have a (what they perceive to be) a strong male figure tell them what to think and how to think it.

The triggerdom is hilarious. Go on, tell us more about those youtube personalities and all that. Get it off your chest.

Weird thing coming from you, sport. Considering you're one of the people here who routinely post clips of youtube ranters like Steven Crowder, Gavin McInnes etc as proof of something. Need a redo?

Originally posted by Robtard
Weird thing coming from you, sport. Considering you're one of the people here who routinely post clips of youtube ranters like Steven Crowder, Gavin McInnes etc as proof of something. Need a redo?

Why would I need a redo? I stand by any youtuber I have posted. I merely meant that if someone wants to whine about the videos being posted have at it, tell me more.