You can look at basic math all you want, but until those "people" actually move or destroy a planet, their theory means nothing because it is NOT a fact. Let's look at proven FACTS. A race cars engine or any cars engine is an controlled explosion that produces power (energy). Now when that fuel and air is ignited, it produces enough energy by forcing those pistons down, ( the compression stroke) that energy propels some race cars at over 300 MPH in the quarter mile around 4 seconds. 2000+ HP on various fuels. Yet that engine contains that power (explosion) now in order for that enging to not contain that power( explosion) you have to apply far more energy that that engine can take, like introducing nitrous oxide which makes more power. That engine now has to deal with far more energy. It will now blow up. In other words, it takes more energy to destyoy that engine that to send it at 300+ mph down the track in 4 seconds.You need no math or theorys made up by man to see this fact.
Oh wow.
I just......yeah.
At the very least, please don't use the word theory like you know what it means, lol.
Originally posted by JBL
You can look at basic math all you want, but until those "people" actually move or destroy a planet, their theory means nothing because it is NOT a fact. Let's look at proven FACTS. A race cars engine or any cars engine is an controlled explosion that produces power (energy). Now when that fuel and air is ignited, it produces enough energy by forcing those pistons down, ( the compression stroke) that energy propels some race cars at over 300 MPH in the quarter mile around 4 seconds. 2000+ HP on various fuels. Yet that engine contains that power (explosion) now in order for that enging to not contain that power( explosion) you have to apply far more energy that that engine can take, like introducing nitrous oxide which makes more power. That engine now has to deal with far more energy. It will now blow up. In other words, it takes more energy to destyoy that engine that to send it at 300+ mph down the track in 4 seconds.You need no math or theorys made up by man to see this fact.
Do you know what gravity is? Like, at all?
Originally posted by JBL
You can look at basic math all you want, but until those "people" actually move or destroy a planet, their theory means nothing because it is NOT a fact. Let's look at proven FACTS. A race cars engine or any cars engine is an controlled explosion that produces power (energy). Now when that fuel and air is ignited, it produces enough energy by forcing those pistons down, ( the compression stroke) that energy propels some race cars at over 300 MPH in the quarter mile around 4 seconds. 2000+ HP on various fuels. Yet that engine contains that power (explosion) now in order for that enging to not contain that power( explosion) you have to apply far more energy that that engine can take, like introducing nitrous oxide which makes more power. That engine now has to deal with far more energy. It will now blow up. In other words, it takes more energy to destyoy that engine that to send it at 300+ mph down the track in 4 seconds.You need no math or theorys made up by man to see this fact.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Here are Surfer, Quasar and Beta Ray Bill trying to destroy a meteor the size of Rhode Island or deflect it.https://s6.postimg.org/gidhdm06p/Star_Masters_2_001.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/9vqtkfii9/Star_Masters_2_003.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/l9dcvmt0x/Star_Masters_2_004.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/8w542gsq9/Star_Masters_2_005.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/hlxlpkktt/Star_Masters_2_006.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/hag5ct4dt/Star_Masters_2_007.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/6mgzrpjsh/Star_Masters_2_008.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/ex7eda4q9/Star_Masters_2_009.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/i913su73l/Star_Masters_2_014.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/jkdgf1s35/Star_Masters_2_015.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/4te33dylt/Star_Masters_2_016.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/t670vcj8x/Star_Masters_2_017.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/vtrvrymwh/Star_Masters_2_018.jpg
https://s6.postimg.org/bnodt2r8x/Star_Masters_2_019.jpgSo much for the planet moving being so easy, eh?
Can you show us a planet mover unable to destroy a planet though?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85I teach classes on the subject. Man has flip flopped for hundreds of years.flat earth, what's a planet and what's a ball of gasses. How the earth was formed, when the dinosaurs lived. When mankind came to be. How old the earth is. How old the universe is. Yet he cannot use any of his methods to tell you how old someone is without FACT and he can see living things every day. Theories are what mankind want to accept to ease his mind. Speaking of gravity?? Go drop a 500 lb ball of steel and a 10 ball of steel and see them drop at the same speed. But let's drop the Subject. I have a class to teach. Thanks for giving me my next course. The effect of gravity and how many times man has changed his mind about what he assumed was. Theory😁
Oh wow.I just......yeah.
At the very least, please don't use the word theory like you know what it means, lol.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85Excuse me, but where in my post did I say my cars are made of watermelons? Or that the shuttle was made of adamantium? How old are you? Wait let me theorize.... You are 7 right?
Did you tell them of your race cars made of watermelons, and the adamantium space shuttles,and how they relate to planets?
At least 6.
Which makes my grasp of math (4 is twice as much as 2!) All the more embarrassing when compared to yours.
But please, keep telling everyone how you know more. What proof have you to offer that smashing a planet is more impressive?
Note I never did mention comic companies. My opinion is based on numbers and maths, yours is based on irrational hate, bias, and an unwillingness to even move a single iota because your ego can't allow you to admit the possibility that someone from DC MIGHT have done something more impressive.
It's a bit sad, really.
But yes, continue telling how 2 is bigger than 4.
Originally posted by DarkSaint852 elephants are bigger than 4 horses.numbers have lied all through history.
At least 6.Which makes my grasp of math (4 is twice as much as 2!) All the more embarrassing when compared to yours.
But please, keep telling everyone how you know more. What proof have you to offer that smashing a planet is more impressive?
Note I never did mention comic companies. My opinion is based on numbers and maths, yours is based on irrational hate, bias, and an unwillingness to even move a single iota because your ego can't allow you to admit the possibility that someone from DC MIGHT have done something more impressive.
It's a bit sad, really.
But yes, continue telling how 2 is bigger than 4.
