This feat is a contradiction because one of the statements is false.
Either the number is just thrown randomly because the writer has no idea what he is talking about or the moon is made of an indestructible material.
But what is finally shown on the feat contradicts what is being said.
In this case PAK thinks Hulk can destroy a planet by indirect hit but fails to destroy a moon by direct hit even though he is saying that Hulk is hitting with the force of a supernova.
This feat is a contradiction and should be taken as such. IMO
Originally posted by abhilegend
And Superman under Pak himself destroyed a moon and a planet.
😂
In the same comic, Bizarro punched Doomsday so hard he exploded. Let's see if you accept it.
Anyways, Hulk has always been shown to control energy which includes the energy directed from his punch. He didn't want to destroy the moon, so it didn't happen. Cho has also been shown capabilities of doing the same thing when it comes to energy and the flow of what he wants to destroy. Amazing showing for Cho. No Herald can exceed this.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Not sure what the feat is, though?Not breaking the moon? That's what happened.
Going over 100on the Richter scale? That didn't happen.
The only good feat here is durability, for Marvel's Moon.
CHO >>> WBH.
It doesn't matter that WBH destroyed 2 planets as a side-effect, while Cho didn't even damage the moon significantly with his all-out attack.
Math ftw.
So the writer says gives a number to Hulks feat and certain people use real life calculations to try and dismiss the feat, yet superman is said to bench the earths weight on a machine that by real life cannot be made nor ever exert that kind of pressure yet superman fans accept it even though the machine took the pressure, the bench took it, the room took it, the floor took it, the area took it. Wow. Cool.