Who has hit harder?Cho Hulk

Started by -K-M-12 pages

If you looked back the original argument was what has more credibility between this scene and the bench pressing feat. I said one is in a controlled environment the other is not. Which is true. Then I explained what a controlled environment is and basic science theory. I also even said this concerning both feats...

Originally posted by -K-M-
Both are silly, but one is less silly then the other

Not doing collateral damage is one thing in comics but doing nothing when a punch is supposed to be much much greater then a super nova? Come on 😬

I have never argued for the planet moving feat. For or against other then saying there goes consistency when the feat first happened (Brianiac ship). There's no quote of me supporting if that's what you mean. Few times I did say here I didn't like the bench pressing feat that I can say for certain

I'm heading to bed so won't get into a full response maybe tomorrow but depends how many responses are in this thread when I return

Re: Who has hit harder?Cho Hulk

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Cho Hulk causes greater than 123 on rictor scale by pounding moon. With the amount of energy release by this according to this guy:

https://www.quora.com/How-strong-is-a-100-Richter-scale-quake

Who has matched or exceeded with their fists?

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gMUkiru0Fzg/WcKRIym0OTI/AAAAAAABtwM/4o40FILa4Awv4mbfwZiwsov1BAOw8UdegCLcBGAs/s1600/038_0018.jpg

Who wrote this?

Greg Pak. Who else?

Didn't so much as do a google search before he wrote that did he?

Fiction doesn't have to make sense and this isn't something new. It's hilarious when nerdy fans go crazy and try to ignore the statements just because they have an agenda. It's just a feat. Calm down.

But if it doesn't make sense its hard to judge the feat no?

Originally posted by Damborgson
Didn't so much as do a google search before he wrote that did he?

Nope

Originally posted by Damborgson
But if it doesn't make sense its hard to judge the feat no?
The feats don't ever matter nor are they consistent.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
OMG it's a comic book. Do you not realize the ridiculousness of repeatedly pushing a machine multiple times that is producing Earth's weight? Why don't the handles break? In the comic book Marvel U. 123 plus rictor will not destroy the moon, and whatever level will destroy it is not reached due to a failsafe. You can't shape the parameters of what is legit and not legit to serve your own bias. You're making yourself look bad.

Ding ding ding we have a winner.

This is the right post.

We have Richtor 123 in a COMIC. Posting that link in your first post, OP, is useless, because it is in THE REAL WORLD.

IOW, we don't have know how powerful Cho's punch was, and thus, cannot answer the OP.

It's a legit feat, in that it happened. Totally unusable, though, as comic measurements mean nothing, as you rightly point out.

Originally posted by leonidas
omg f'n lord.....

pr, bada, please i'm literally begging you--you HAVE to close this. i think, legitimately, it might be THE single most embarrassing thread in kmc history. phil, this makes the tanks/balloons discussion look like a phukcing discourse between einstein, hawking and newton. any lurkers reading this will never read another kmc thread and i can't blame them. hell, i might not. i can hear lurkers from other sites LAUGHING at the sheer stupidity of this discussion. i'm tempted to join comicvine for the first time, then post a link to this thread to utterly confirm their idea that this forum is full of f'n morons. i don't give a sh!t what anyone thinks of hulk's attack. but to suddenly claim the earth mass feat by superman is wrong because we "only have the word of a scientist" that he was lifting it is truly [b]UNPRECEDENTED in its stupidity.

though it's likely too late already, for the sake of the forum, i am honestly begging, BEGGING, a mod to close this abomination and if possible e-burn it. [/B]

👆

This is really embarrassing.

I would like to reiterate - richter scale is logarithmic.

Anybody in this thread arguing the statement is valid, and not something the writer randomly put there because he has no idea what he's talking about, are effectively arguing that a punch that has enough energy to destroy the UNIVERSE SEVERAL TIMES couldn't destroy the moon.

That is the level this 'debate' has sunk to.

That's not even the worse thing.

OPeven links to a real world calculation, which gives the sheer amount of energy that it means, IN THE REAL WORLD.

Then calls others out on using Real World logic. THAT'S the funniest

Edit: further reading of that feat highlights more discrepancies.

They say Cho 'WILL' break the moon. IOW, Pak was throwing the usual 'indestructible Earth/Moon' trope out the window. Had Cho continued his multiversal punching, he would indeed break the Moon.

So no, it's nothing like the usual 'oh theres no collateral damage, so it can't have been that high' arguments. Because the writer was fully prepared to showcase it's destruction.

He just didn't think a punch that registers 123 on the Richter scale was enough to do so.

The Hulk idiots are funny as hell in this thread

This feat makes as much sense as Heimdall surviving a flying imp to the umpteenth power punch from Gladiator. Other than knocking Heimedall off his feat, the punch did nothing more than damage the rainbow bridge. Minimal damage too..
😂
Comics....
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-CjKj46YOgd8/WPjPrRA6daI/AAAAAAADZOw/IiwzH4vFh8UQWe5GrCialrONxGFtQp8sQCLcB/s1600/069_002.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S47aTEV5edU/WPjPr7XWkGI/AAAAAAADZO0/bqWq3O5m0N0KBQN6rh0E-iqlrcDkpQqqwCLcB/s1600/069_003.jpg

Except....the Heimdall feat doesn't have Heimdall thinking 'Good Gods, he hit me with the equivalent of 35 Big Bangs! Any more, and my bridge would have split!!!!!'

The moon was already beginning to break. Pak was ignoring the 'no collateral damage' trope, and was actually showing it.

Except apparently it takes a moonquake that measures at least 124 to destroy it, lol.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
This feat makes as much sense as Heimdall surviving a flying imp to the umpteenth power punch from Gladiator. Other than knocking Heimedall off his feat, the punch did nothing more than damage the rainbow bridge. Minimal damage too..
😂
Comics....
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-CjKj46YOgd8/WPjPrRA6daI/AAAAAAADZOw/IiwzH4vFh8UQWe5GrCialrONxGFtQp8sQCLcB/s1600/069_002.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S47aTEV5edU/WPjPr7XWkGI/AAAAAAADZO0/bqWq3O5m0N0KBQN6rh0E-iqlrcDkpQqqwCLcB/s1600/069_003.jpg

Yep. It's comics. Basing things off of coateral damage is just ignoring what we already know.

It's about as dumb as lifting book of infinite pages except this time, the crazy @$$ writer assigned a calculable value. An uneducated and inadequately researched value...

I don't want to completely handwave the feat, but I take it with a grain of of salt.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
It's about as dumb as lifting book of infinite pages except this time, the crazy @$$ writer assigned a calculable value. A an uneducated and inadequately researched value...

I don't want to completely handwave the feat, but I take it with a grain of of salt.


Its a good feat for the moon,but that's it.

As I said, you need greater than 123 on the Ricter scale to break the moon, apparently.

Anyways, back on topic. Aside from Hulk's penis constantly in Pak's orifices, this punch was pretty boss.
http://imgur.com/lU9VwGG.jpg
http://imgur.com/L1N5PUP.jpg

Big G upped the ante.
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11113/111132618/3773759-thorvsgalactus+punchingthroughearth.jpg
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11113/111132618/3773761-thorvsgalactus+punchingthroughearth-02.jpg
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11119/111197929/4911360-stalesmates+galactus+on+what+seems+strength+and+energies+blasts..jpg

Yeah but that's nothing compared to the multiversal level punches of Cho.....and that's being serious.

OP asked, and then posted a link to a site where it shows Richter 100 plus quakes have XYZ energy.

Your scans couldbe doubled or tripled, or even a hundred fold. It still wouldn't be anywhere near that.

Remember.

The link only talks about Richter 100 quakes. Every increase in magnitude is 30 TIMES more powerful than the last.

So that multiversal punch at 100? 101 is 30 times more powerful. 102 is 30 times more powerful than that. 103 is ANOTHER 30 times more powerful.

All the way up to 123.

At this rate, it's pretty much like enough energy to destroy over a tens of millions of universes all at once

A billion supernovas is chump change.