Mace Windu and Anakin Skywalker versus Darth Sidious

Originally posted by Azronger

Not that I mentioned anything about blitzing anywhere in my post anyway so I have no idea why you're even bringing this up.

Previously:

Originally posted by Azronger
Palpatine one-shots

Lmfao Thor, one-shot =/= blitz.

Yeah, lol. Palpatine isn't blitzing, and most likely loses a pure saber fight.

What's the difference between one shotting and blitzing then

Originally posted by Rebel95
What's the difference between one shotting and blitzing then

Blitzing occurs via comparative augmentation. Oneshotting occurs via Force superiority.

Originally posted by Rebel95
What's the difference between one shotting and blitzing then

Originally posted by Kurk
Blitzing is what Sheev did to the Bteam. One shotting is what Dooku did to Anakin in AotC

Knightfall Anakin? Yeah, team wins.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Lmfao Thor, one-shot =/= blitz.

Originally posted by Azronger
Yeah, lol. Palpatine isn't blitzing, and most likely loses a pure saber fight.

Geez. Semantics aside, DE Palpatine never "one shot" Luke either. So the notion he's going to one shot Prime Windu and Prime Anakin combined, is almost just as ridiculous.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Geez. Semantics aside, DE Palpatine never "one shot" Luke either. So the notion he's going to one shot Prime Windu and Prime Anakin combined, is almost just as ridiculous.

He did. And besides, this is an argument from ignorance. It's illogical and therefore invalid. Using this logic, we could arrive at conclusions far more ridiculous than Palpatine one-shotting here.

To put it simply, just because Palpatine - or anyone - hasn't, doesn't mean he can't.

Originally posted by Azronger
He did. And besides, this is an argument from ignorance. It's illogical and therefore invalid. Using this logic, we could arrive at conclusions far more ridiculous than Palpatine one-shotting here.

To put it simply, just because Palpatine - or anyone - hasn't, doesn't mean he can't.

It's usually a safe and reasonable conclusion actually. Better than fan wanking delusional scenarios.

👆

Generally speaking, calling something delusional doesn't make something so. You can off course argue that something is delusional, given you are willing to give reasons and evidence for why such a belief would be delusional.

And anyway Thor, didn't Luke get one-shotted by the hologram of a pre-de sids?

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Generally speaking, calling something delusional doesn't make something so. You can off course argue that something is delusional, given you are willing to give reasons and evidence for why such a belief would be delusional.

Urm no when you're gonna make something up that never happened, it certainly not up to your opponent to prove why that's delusional.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
And anyway Thor, didn't Luke get one-shotted by the hologram of a pre-de sids?

Where? And wouldn't it being a Pre-DE Sids also mean it's a Pre-DE Luke?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Urm no when you're gonna make something up that never happened, it certainly not up to your opponent to prove why that's delusional.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Where? And wouldn't it being a Pre-DE Sids also mean it's a Pre-DE Luke?