Dooku a Force Accumulator?

Started by UCanShootMyNova2 pagesPoll

Can Dooku fully replenish his Force reserves with a moment of concentration?

Dooku a Force Accumulator?

Was Dooku replenishing every bit of Force energy he'd used up in his fight with Anakin in the RotS novel or was he simply sustaining himself with the Force? I'll leave it to you KMC.

... the ****? You mean, like, was Dooku replenishing every lost energy with a gain? LMFAO, no.

In a particular instance though (after downing Obi-Wan), he did replenish himself close-to-fully though. 👆

*Sniff* *Sniff*

Do you smell that?

It smells like desperation.

🙂

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
*Sniff* *Sniff*

Do you smell that?

It smells like desperation.

🙂

You misreading my argument to the point you make a thread complaining about it is now my desperation?

Oh, so you're backtracking now? Dooku only replenished himself "close to fully?"

We can make another thread if you don't like this one's outcome. 🙂

I'm always willing to accommodate those special snowflakes.

I never defined a limit on the amount Dooku replenished his resources, just that he did replenish his resources, rofl.

I don't know how much he did it, but clearly enough for your exhaustion argument to be irrelevant.

This is getting obsessive and cringy at this point, Syn.

What the hell is your evidence for Force user's being able to "replenish their resources" within a moment's notice to the point that any energy loss is negligible?

I don't even think they can - but you literally used specifically Dooku and his reserves within the ROTS novel, which exactly has Dooku replenishing his resources at a moment's notice.

In other words, you shot yourself in the foot. And with this whole thread thing, you shot yourself in the head.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I don't even think they can

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I never defined a limit on the amount Dooku replenished his resources, just that he did replenish his resources, rofl.

I don't know how much he did it, but clearly enough for your exhaustion argument to be irrelevant.

FFS Syndicate.

You used the ROTS novel, particularly it's statements on Dooku and his reserves, as evidence against the prospect of Mace being healthy.

I turned it around and said the ROTS novel, aka what you said you would be using, literally has Dooku instantly replenishing his reserves.

I never said that was my personal take on the matter. I said that's what the ROTS novel says - which you were using.

Follow yet? Or do you have to make a couple more poll threads to catch my drift?

Ant. You are literally saying you believe a Mace/Dooku level Force user can replenish their energy when they're near empty to near peak levels to the point that whatever gap exists between those replenished levels and their peak it is negligible.

Is that not the case? Am I misunderstanding what you're saying in some way?

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I never said that was my personal take on the matter. I said that's what the ROTS novel says - which you were using.

That's not what it says though... That's your interpretation of what it says. 0_0

And THAT'S THE POINT.

I think such an interpretation is utterly idiotic. And I am having the KMC populace vote on whether they think it is or isn't themselves.

facepalm

The Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith adult novelization, written by Matthew Stover, indeed states what you're saying.

You, as in Syndicate, were using Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith adult novelization to justify certain stances on the Force.

I, as DarthAnt66, noted that the Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith adult novelization has a passage, which is the one in question, directly destroying your argument.

You, as in Syndicate, took this as an outrageous offense that I could believe such a thing.

I, as DarthAnt66, do not, but pointed out the Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith adult novelization, which you were using, does.

Ant. I view your interpretation of the quote as retarded. That's the long and short of it. These threads are just to see whether KMC agrees or not.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
No, your two polls were completely different.

Your first poll argued I alleged Dooku was constantly replenishing his resources: [b]false.

Your second poll argued I believe Dooku can instantly replenish his resources: false. [/B]

Also, whats with you and polls now? Every time you disagree with me, rather than debate it, you run to the polls.

And then when you create the polls, you don't even provide relevant information.

How about we debate it first so you can see what I'm getting at. 😬

No. The first poll alleged that you believed Dooku fully replenished his energy after saying Dooku had "reset" himself.

Reset meaning to set back to its former state.

You backtracked so the second thread I made asked whether or not Mace/Dooku level Force user's can replenish their depleted energy levels back to nearly full as you outright stated. I have the screen shots as well so it's too late to edit now.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Also, whats with you and polls now? Every time you disagree with me, rather than debate it, you run to the polls.

Something I learned from you. 🙂

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
No. The first poll alleged that you believed Dooku fully replenished his energy after saying Dooku had "reset" himself.

Reset meaning to set back to its former state.

You backtracked so the second thread I made asked whether or not Mace/Dooku level Force user's can replenish their depleted energy levels back to nearly full as you outright stated. I have the screen shots as well so it's too late to edit now.

Syn, no offense, but at this point you're being really ****ing annoying and outright retarded.

No, the first poll did not state that in the original opening, nor did I ever backtrack from that stance.

Your second version of the thread is the same as before, unless you're making the distinction be from "fully" to "nearly."

If so, I checked all my posts and found nothing states "fully." You, once again, read me wrong.

FWI, whatever you took for "fully" or "nearly fully" was just casual writing on my part. I wasn't trying to slip in a secret concession, it was just indifferent to the matter.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Something I learned from you. 🙂

I've done it one time with Kbro after a lengthy debate just to express the point that he was literally alone in his sentiment.