Can Luminara Unduli ragdoll AotC Anakin?

Started by Ursumeles3 pages

Can Luminara Unduli ragdoll AotC Anakin?

can she?

Yes

Az, I'm fairly confident this thread was a meme and yet you still agree with it.

Of course it was a meme to mock kbro's arguments over at CV. I'm not stupid enough to not understand that.

In canon, anyone can ragdoll who they please as long as they're caught off-guard.

Originally posted by Kurk
In canon, anyone can ragdoll who they please as long as they're caught off-guard.

😆 Same goes for getting captured by Pirates or almost being eaten by a dog

Originally posted by godemperortrump
😆 Same goes for getting captured by Pirates or almost being eaten by a dog
Or captured by battle droids 🙂

Kbro thinks Luminara can ragdoll AOTC Anakin? KEK.

I said she can defeat AOTC Anakin with the force.

Appeals to incredulity aside, Luminara has fought roughly evenly and telkentically stalemated with a superior version of someone who has dominated a superior version of Anakin.

Yyou can say ventress's ragdolls were because of the wekanesses and openeings Anakin leaves rather than superior power(Nova's argument) but the point still stands, ventress has repeatedly been able to exploit the force to take superior versions of Anakin. Ventress pinned Anakin to the wal in the TCW movie's novelization, and has blasted season 3 Anakin who should be growing at a much faster rate than Ventress is.
Finally, we've seen Ventress straight up stalemate TCW Anakin in a telekinetic bout well after AOTC.

Luminara has contended well enough with Ventress 1 v 1 that the notion of her replicating what Ventress has done to superior versions of Anakin to AOTC Anakin is perfectly plausible.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang

Appeals to incredulity aside, Luminara has fought roughly evenly and telkentically stalemated with a superior version of someone who has dominated a superior version of Anakin.

When did pre-"Cloak of Darkness" Ventress dominate Anakin?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
When did pre-"Cloak of Darkness" Ventress dominate Anakin?
She pins him on a wall in the TCW movie's novelization

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
She pins him on a wall in the TCW movie's novelization

So not Canon.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
So not Canon.

This is canon only?

no

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
This is canon only?

It's not even Canon to Legends lol because it contradicts the TCW movie.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
It's not even Canon to Legends lol because it contradicts the TCW movie.

Uh, how? The TCW Movie never showed us the fight between Anakin and Ventress. 😬

When does the fight take place in the book? Is it the movie's deleted scene fight?

Originally posted by |King Joker|
When does the fight take place in the book? Is it the movie's deleted scene fight?
Lemme ask for a quote from greyset on cv, I'll post, but yea, I'm guessing that's what the novel goes into depth about

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Uh, how? The TCW Movie never showed us the fight between Anakin and Ventress. 😬
Because it didn't happen. Ventress was mindtricking Rex so that she could get the location of Anakin, but Anakin and Ahsoka caught onto the fact that Ventress was manipulating Rex, so they left the room they were in immediately. In the deleted scene, Ventress appears at the doorway as Anakin and Ahsoka are leaving right after Rex's message, which makes no sense because twenty seconds prior she was with Rex at the entrance of the temple. And I'm pretty sure Ventress can't teleport.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Because it didn't happen. Ventress was mindtricking Rex so that she could get the location of Anakin, but Anakin and Ahsoka caught onto the fact that Ventress was manipulating Rex, so they left the room they were in immediately. In the deleted scene, Ventress appears at the doorway as Anakin and Ahsoka are leaving right after Rex's message, which makes no sense because twenty seconds prior she was with Rex at the entrance of the temple. And I'm pretty sure Ventress can't teleport.

Yea, a scene not being shown in the movie doesn't contradict a source that depicts said scene.

You can't use the deleted scene to try and force a contradiction because, well, it's a deleted scene.