Chelseas Sweetheart Contracts

You based your facts off one word though, I based my facts off the dates of contracts. I'm not angry. Also how is this clickbait?

Yes, we covered that. I took what you said exactly as it was written, how weird of someone to do that.

Also, the correct answer to my question was: The Republican Party. Not Trump, as you kneejerked and assumed.

If people had actually read the article, they wouldn't have to make excuses for getting things wrong.

I'm still fascinated by what happened. Rob blamed everyone but himself, then blamed me for writing "win" instead of "won" which he based his "facts off" then said I was being ignorant of the facts..tried to make me feel bad cause he took my word for it based on one single word.

All the while refused to acknowledge the actual issue and story that Chelsea hooked her friends up with defense contracts to the tune of $11 billion. While always having Ivanka and Jared on blast who aren't even taking salaries.

Originally posted by Sable
I'm still fascinated by what happened. Rob blamed everyone but himself, then blamed me for writing "win" instead of "won" which he based his "facts off" then said I was being ignorant of the facts..tried to make me feel bad cause he took my word for it based on one single word.

All the while refused to acknowledge the actual issue and story that Chelsea hooked her friends up with defense contracts to the tune of $11 billion. While always having Ivanka and Jared on blast who aren't even taking salaries.

It would be even more embarrassing for Rob if he'd ever made it a point in other threads to claim people hadn't read the article and had just gone by the title.

Originally posted by Surtur
It would be even more embarrassing for Rob if he'd ever made it a point in other threads to claim people hadn't read the article and had just gone by the title.

I didn't go "by the title", I went with what Sable said as mentioned in my first post. So your point as usual is pointless. Hey, you tried though.

Originally posted by Surtur
It would be even more embarrassing for Rob if he'd *never made it a point in other threads to claim people hadn't read the article and had just gone by the title.

Fixed

Originally posted by Robtard
I didn't go "by the title", I went with what Sable said as mentioned in my first post. So your point as usual is pointless. Hey, you tried though.

Title, OP what's the difference?

But you still haven't actually addressed the topic. Blamed everyone else. But won't address the cronie capitalism

Odd that he took you at your word here, I've never seen him do that before.

Originally posted by Robtard
I didn't go "by the title", I went with what Sable said as mentioned in my first post. So your point as usual is pointless. Hey, you tried though.

You're correct Rob, what you did wasn't any less lazy, somehow.

Rob you used to put me on blast for reading headlines and ignoring facts. Your the only one here doing that now.

This is poor form. Own up to it.