Outlander vs. Ahsoka Tano (Rebels) (Sabers)

Who wins

Ahsoka.
Scaling above Maul and having near parity with a ROTS Kenobi+duelist is better than anything the Outlander has blade-wise.

Outlander.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Outlander.

👆 👆

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Outlander.

Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
👆 👆

Outlander destroys. >/= Arcann in sabers is better than anything Ahsoka has.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Ahsoka.
Scaling above Maul and having near parity with a ROTS Kenobi+duelist is better than anything the Outlander has blade-wise.

In terms of lightsaber skills:

Outlander > Malgus > Muur > Krayt >>> Hett.

That's just being conservative.

Hett performed exceptionally against Post-ROTS Kenobi.

Try harder.

Originally posted by AncientPower
In terms of lightsaber skills:

Outlander > Malgus > Muur > Krayt >>> Hett.

That's just being conservative.

Hett performed exceptionally against Post-ROTS Kenobi.

Try harder.

😂 😂 😂

Point being that scaling is actually pointless here.

Outlander wins

how does either the outlander or malgus scale above Kenobi ap?

Because they're both superior to Muur, who's clearly all over Krayt in their duel.

Ahsoka.

Dies.

Defeats Arcann with ease.

Originally posted by AncientPower
Because they're both superior to Muur, who's clearly all over Krayt in their duel.

A heavily weakened Krayt, tbf.

Which doesn't make up for his massive increases in power and skill between then, and facing Kenobi as Hett a century prior.

Which also isn't all that relevant when considering that Muur was fighting Morne for control of her body at the same time, not to mention that he hasn't had any physical training in 7,000 years.

Nor does that account for the fact that Muur was a renowned sorcerer, not warrior. Nor does he have anywhere near the feats and accolades of a Malgus or Outlander.

The logic for Malgus > Muur bcz feats is retarded, when Obi has better feats than Malgus.

Not when he has an accolade from Sidious stating his feats on the battlefield haven't been replicated by any Sith since.

That's ignoring that Muur was beating Krayt. Who is vastly superior to his Jedi incarnation, who was holding his own against Kenobi.

So he's really good at killing fodder?