Name kmc posters and their nemesis

Started by Bashar Teg17 pages

and just like *THAT* anti-feminist circlejerk 😂

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I just noticed theres two dudes in the crowd. Can you spot them?

...there's definitely more than two there, br0.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and just like *THAT* anti-feminist circlejerk 😂

are you a feminist?

i support feminism, but tbh i don't really lift a finger to advocate it beyond not treating women like shit and blaming them for problems.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i support feminism, but tbh i don't really lift a finger to advocate it beyond not treating women like shit and blame them for problems.

who blames feminism directly? ultimately men have the power.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i support feminism, but tbh i don't really lift a finger to advocate it beyond not treating women like shit and blaming them for problems.

It's unfortunate that there aren't more feminists like you bro. That don't treat men like shit and blame them for problems.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's unfortunate that there aren't more feminists like you bro. That don't treat men like shit and blame them for problems.

this is definitely something that feminists do. but it's all in the vote. and it's men not voting with their brains that leads to destruction. soft men...like male feminists who women secretly despise

Originally posted by Raisen
this is definitely something that feminists do. but it's all in the vote. and it's men not voting with their brains that leads to destruction. soft men...like male feminists who women secretly despise

And I am still amazed when feminists try to say it's not just about equality for women, but it is meant to help men too. But if that is the case, why refer to it as feminism? There is indeed a word for it: Egalitarianism.

Originally posted by Surtur
And I am still amazed when feminists try to say it's not just about equality for women, but it is meant to help men too. But if that is the case, why refer to it as feminism? There is indeed a word for it: Egalitarianism.

egalitarianism doesn't really work either tho. we just need to accept biological differences between men and women and go from there. we are different because we are intended for different purposes.

Originally posted by Raisen
egalitarianism doesn't really work either tho. we just need to accept biological differences between men and women and go from there. we are different because we are intended for different purposes.

That is blasphemy though, we're supposed to be 100% equal.

Originally posted by Surtur
That is blasphemy though, we're supposed to be 100% equal.

men are generally bigger and denser. men generally learn a different way than women. men generally have more testosterone which leads to more competitiveness and aggression.
men on average are 5 points more intelligent than women(after pubescent years)

we are different. and the way we are changing things are detrimental to males. schools becoming homework based instead of test based is detrimental to how males learn. if we are going to just change things in favor of one sex then the sexes should at least be segregated in school and taught differently

Originally posted by Raisen
men are generally bigger and denser. men generally learn a different way than women. men generally have more testosterone which leads to more competitiveness and aggression.
men on average are 5 points more intelligent than women(after pubescent years)

we are different. and the way we are changing things are detrimental to males. schools becoming homework based instead of test based is detrimental to how males learn. if we are going to just change things in favor of one sex then the sexes should at least be segregated in school and taught differently

I didn't mean physically, I meant mentally/emotionally. Even though it's not the case.

Originally posted by Surtur
I didn't mean physically, I meant mentally/emotionally. Even though it's not the case.

definitely different. the hormones are different man.

women's primary internal motivation is safety. they are weaker and more emotional and this feeling of needing to feel safe is a primary driver...it's a maternal instinct even if they don't have children.
hence, women will be more fearful of imaginary boogeymen that the media creates.
hence, they will learn differently and emotional based stories will carry more weight to them than cold, hard facts.
they vote based on "safety nets" and care based morality so liberals will always have the female vote. so just create a couple "wars on women" every once in a while and you keep their votes.

typically conservative women are married...they worried about the hubbies taxes.

in the end its all about safety

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i support feminism, but tbh i don't really lift a finger to advocate it beyond not treating women like shit and blaming them for problems.

You're a sock and so is your pal Steve.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
as i said, this was attempted many times by the broski who PM'd you this cunning little ruse. they failed as well because mod notes exist in spite of your cute little imagination. your current hissy fit conjures an image of a dumpster full of burning diapers.
Originally posted by Surtur
Oh your desperation is hilarious, nobody even PM'ed me for this, lol!

Yes. Bashy is probably a sock, but he can be a sock. He is the CORRECT kind of KMC poster. The rules don't apply to him.

Originally posted by Surtur
Indeed, there have been plenty of hard hitting pieces of Cracked over the years about hookers.

Of course now all they do is whine about Trump it seems, but still.

You are so cringe worthy weird.

Originally posted by Nuke Nixon
I know it's been so very long since someone has liked you that you can't deal with it, poor Q.
Stop.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I want to read your answer. Have you kissed a girl? Like, on the lips?
Your mom likes when I kiss her other lips.