Wonder Woman vs Hulk

Started by Juk3n4 pages

Well then we're all in agreement. Since Diana is faster by magnitudes there's a credible chance(like in any fight) where the hugely faster combatant can at some point catch the slower guy off guard.

And we've literally just concluded that all it takes to knock out angry hulk is a not very hard punch from a direction in which he isn't looking.

Cool I guess.

I'm all for establishing limits.

Diana takes the first one.

Much closer in the second. She has much more fighting skill and speed.

Originally posted by Juk3n
Well then we're all in agreement. Since Diana is faster by magnitudes there's a credible chance(like in any fight) where the hugely faster combatant can at some point catch the slower guy off guard.

And we've literally just concluded that all it takes to knock out angry hulk is a not very hard punch from a direction in which he isn't looking.

Cool I guess.

I'm all for establishing limits.

Completrly different circumstances. He isn't coming out of mind control nor is he staring at soldiers get tinge revved up so your point is dismantled right before your very eyes,

So you don't believe a cheapshot hurts or has more of an impact than a lunch you can see coming. Well you've obviously never been in a fight or have any concept of making a relevant point here.

Diana should be too fast for Hulk if she puts her mind to it, which means she should have no problems slicing him up in round 1 (though it beggars the question of why she didn't consistently try to do so against Ares).

But in h2h, I'm not convinced that Diana has enough damage output to take out Hulk.

Diana is faster, stronger and a better fighter than Hulk in either scenario... with weapons she destroys Hulk, without its a good fight but she still comes out the winner although Hulk does certainly have a punchers chance in that one.

Originally posted by relentless1
Diana is faster, stronger and a better fighter than Hulk in either scenario... with weapons she destroys Hulk, without its a good fight but she still comes out the winner although Hulk does certainly have a punchers chance in that one.

Faster and better fighter I'll give you but nothing WW has done can even come close to Hulk's leviathan punch.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Faster and better fighter I'll give you but nothing WW has done can even come close to Hulk's leviathan punch.

It's relentless1 and WW is a DC character.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Faster and better fighter I'll give you but nothing WW has done can even come close to Hulk's leviathan punch.

yes ill concede to that feat for sure but she put up a helluva fight against a superior foe in doomsday which is a A+ strength feat in and of itself; she cold stopped his onslaught with her sword at one point even cutting his hand off so I'm not sure what hulk can do to her if she has her sword and shield

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would I book a flight to England to beat you up. I'm not fat at all but I'm sure you have to tell yourself lies to fill up that bucket of holes you call your self esteem.

How do you know Hulk couldn't overpower Superman or wouldn't survive a nuke.

You haven't proven anything as to believe that. Thor uses skill all the time. We see his skill when he's depowered and decimates agents in the first film. WW needed aid to fight against world war soldiers. 😂

Her people were getting their asses kicked by them. She needed the aid of the other two to briefly hold him up. She isn't close to his strength so quit creating a false idea based off that.

Thor has a speed advantage as well but guess what happened. She has a speed advantage on DD. She isn't untouchable and I don't believe she can easily cut off Hulk's limbs. That's just that weakling DD. He pounds her into the dirt. We see Thir can't even go toe to toe with him.

I don't have self esteem issues. I'm not the one who's trolling on forums 24/7 looking for attention.

Because he doesn't have the feats for it. His best strength and durability feats are miles bellow Superman's best.

Lmao, what skill? He's just a brawler beating up some featless goons. WW needed help? Really? Is that what you're saying? Because I recall her blitzing an entire army of Germans at the end of the movie.

Diana is >>>>>> other Amazons so I don't know what you're tying to say here.

She briefly restrained DD with the lasso before Batman hit him with a kryptonite grenade. Superman wasn't even there lol, he was busy getting the spear.

Thor doesn't have better speed feats than Hulk and if he does the difference is negligible. The difference in speed between Hulk and Wonder Woman is far greater. She's literally hundreds, if not thousands of times faster, than him.

She easily cut DD and he ate a nuke. What's Hulk's best durability feat? Getting KOed by Iron Man?

Originally posted by Psychotron

Thor doesn't have better speed feats than Hulk and if he does the difference is negligible.

Thor dodged a few of Hulk’s hits with greater speed and mobility.

Probably because Thor is 1/3 the size of Hulk. Also, Thor knows how to throw a punch, Hulk is a giant child throwing a tantrum.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Probably because Thor is 1/3 the size of Hulk. Also, Thor knows how to throw a punch, Hulk is a giant child throwing a tantrum.

Nah, Hulk never had problems landing blows on Chitauri or on Loki.

Thor’s Just faster.

Originally posted by Psychotron
I don't have self esteem issues. I'm not the one who's trolling on forums 24/7 looking for attention.

Because he doesn't have the feats for it. His best strength and durability feats are miles bellow Superman's best.

Lmao, what skill? He's just a brawler beating up some featless goons. WW needed help? Really? Is that what you're saying? Because I recall her blitzing an entire army of Germans at the end of the movie.

Diana is >>>>>> other Amazons so I don't know what you're tying to say here.

She briefly restrained DD with the lasso before Batman hit him with a kryptonite grenade. Superman wasn't even there lol, he was busy getting the spear.

Thor doesn't have better speed feats than Hulk and if he does the difference is negligible. The difference in speed between Hulk and Wonder Woman is far greater. She's literally hundreds, if not thousands of times faster, than him.

She easily cut DD and he ate a nuke. What's Hulk's best durability feat? Getting KOed by Iron Man?

I am here to debate you're the guy threatening to fight people online because you can't control your own emotional inner turmoil.

No, they aren't. Hulk casually stopped the leviathan whereas superman passed out holding up a tower with less speed and less weight.

He does have skill just not as much as Thor. He is skilled enough to get the better of Thor with a weapon. She needed help and can't take the impact of bullets directly. Hulk merely swats them away as minor irritants. Different classes of durability and strength.

She is more skilled but she isn't durable enough to tank the bullets like Hulk is. She needed aid against ancient weaponry as well. Pitiful.

That's the lasso not a strength feat. She caught him off guard but wasn't strong enough to hold him which is the point so don't be disingenious.

Surviving a battle in which an amped iron man suit reforms is far greater than dodging bullets and needing humans to help out pre modern day times. This isn't close. Once he connects she will falter and quickly. He can won't stand her punishment she can't withstand his. He's the Hulk you ignorant cuck.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am here to debate you're the guy threatening to fight people online because you can't control your own emotional inner turmoil.

No, they aren't. Hulk casually stopped the leviathan whereas superman passed out holding up a tower with less speed and less weight.

He does have skill just not as much as Thor. He is skilled enough to get the better of Thor with a weapon. She needed help and can't take the impact of bullets directly. Hulk merely swats them away as minor irritants. Different classes of durability and strength.

She is more skilled but she isn't durable enough to tank the bullets like Hulk is. She needed aid against ancient weaponry as well. Pitiful.

That's the lasso not a strength feat. She caught him off guard but wasn't strong enough to hold him which is the point so don't be disingenious.

Surviving a battle in which an amped iron man suit reforms is far greater than dodging bullets and needing humans to help out pre modern day times. This isn't close. Once he connects she will falter and quickly. He can won't stand her punishment she can't withstand his. He's the Hulk you ignorant cuck.

Then why did you bring it up, dumbass?

No, the Hulk tipped over an already falling Leviathan. Iron Man was the one stopped it permanently.

Hulk has absolutely no skill, he's just a raging monster. Thor is a brawler. Diana didn't need help to kill the Germans, what are you even on about? WW blocks bullets, but we know she can tank hits from DD, who is far more powerful than Hulk by feats, so Hulk isn't going to put her down.

And yet, Hulk was KOed by Iron Man and pinned down by Chitauri lasers, which even Cap took.

If she wasn't strong enough to at least briefly hold him Doomsday would have just ragdolled her and freed himself.

Hahaha, surviving a fight with Iron Man is impressive now? Lmao, Cap beat his ass, you tard. A truck took out an Iron Man armor. This makes Hulk look pathetic. The fact that Iron Man's Hulkbuster armor matched the strength of an enraged Hulk should tell you just how "strong" Banner is. Diana survived Doomsday, Hulk will be a walk in the park. She'll blitz his ass and there's nothing Hulk can do about it.

Apparently wvery one of Iron Man's armors are the same 😖hrug:

Originally posted by HulkIsHulk
Apparently wvery one of Iron Man's armors are the same 😖hrug:

Would you agree that his newer armors are more advanced than his older ones?

More advanced =/= more durable

Originally posted by juggerman
More advanced =/= more durable

👆 Yeah. It was made obvious from Iron Man 2, onwards

Originally posted by juggerman
More advanced =/= more durable

Yeah, I'm sure Iron Man made his newer armors crap on purpose.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Yeah, I'm sure Iron Man made his newer armors crap on purpose.

Lemme see if I can explain this to you. Let's say Tony upgrades his armor to fly faster but in doing so he has to lighten it so he makes it thinner, and in doing so, less durable. The armor could be upgraded offensively but slightly worse defensively. We see something like this in Ironman 3. That armor was pretty shitty defensively but could locate Tony in another part of the world