CDT
Re: Re: Taxes: Yea or Nay?
Originally posted by Robtard
If the option is yes or no, obviously it's a yes. A modern society needs funding to function. I could see a no tax system working in a tribal environment, where's there's a few hundred people policing themselves, looking out for the community, specific roles are laid out, bartering etc. Expand beyond a tribe and we need a more rigid/expansive system and that cost money.As you noted, it does seem like we could do away with a lot of taxes if our system wasn't so broken with money leaking out pores. We [blindly] throw trillions at a system and then elect degenerates to run it.
eg I'm sure our military could be streamlined to be just as efficient at destroying the next 10 countries over and not cost us nearly 600billion a year. Same goes for healthcare services, i'm certain it could be made more efficient at a lower cost. Social Security is one I'm not so eager to touch though.
This country is run like the mob.
Probably because it has actual criminals running it. See Whitey, Bulger.
ROB
Re: Re: Re: Taxes: Yea or Nay?
Originally posted by cdtm
This country is run like the mob.Probably because it has actual criminals running it. See Whitey, Bulger.
Dunno, Mobs seems to have their shit in order, sure it's a corrupt system, but they're not leaking like a gutted pig.
DAD
Re: Re: Taxes: Yea or Nay?
Originally posted by socool8520
I never said that taxes were immoral. lol I'm not Ben Shapiro. I simply said i shouldn't be taxed so much solely for taking care of everyone else.
My fault. I thought you were anti-income taxes because of your wording. I wanted to give you your own thread to discuss it because I do have the no-income taxes lean.
Yes, all taxes go to helping everyone else: that's what taxes are.
Originally posted by socool8520
I also disagree that all those would need to be removed. I will gladly front the money for a service provided which everything you mentioned does. I pay money, they provide a much needed service. I'm all for that. What I don't feel the need for (and I admit I may just be not compassionate enough) is to give money away to help others who do not provide me with anything in return.
Then I think you could easily be swayed with the Fair Tax system which means pretty much everyone pays taxes. Anyone who spends money, pays taxes. That means we all would be providing services for each other and the homeless and destitute would get free healthcare while all the rest of us "contribute."
Originally posted by socool8520
I would be much more in agreeance with welfare and universal healthcare if those who were too poor to afford help themselves were made to go to a trade school or become certified to fix our road systems or something of the like. Then we would be getting something in return.
I 100% agree with you. If someone benefits from the system, they should be required to work for the "community." If they can hold a sign up at a street corner, they can wash windows, empty trashcans, etc.
SOC
socool8520
Life's a garden, Dig it
Re: Re: Re: Taxes: Yea or Nay?
Originally posted by dadudemon
My fault. I thought you were anti-income taxes because of your wording. I wanted to give you your own thread to discuss it because I do have the no-income taxes lean.Yes, all taxes go to helping everyone else: that's what taxes are.
Oh, you mean no income tax. While I have benefited from this, I could definitely see the reasoning for not receiving that check every year for tax breaks. I'm not against taking that away.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Then I think you could easily be swayed with the Fair Tax system which means pretty much everyone pays taxes. Anyone who spends money, pays taxes. That means we all would be providing services for each other and the homeless and destitute would get free healthcare while all the rest of us "contribute."
Absolutely. I agree that taxes are a necessary evil for infrastructure and civil service funding.
I would be okay with aiding people who have some people disability that physically prohibits them from working enough to pay for their own well-being. Just being poor is not reason enough for me though. If they want better healthcare or access to it at all, then they should have to do something extra to get it if they can't afford it already. Much like the things you mentioned in the post below.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I 100% agree with you. If someone benefits from the system, they should be required to work for the "community." If they can hold a sign up at a street corner, they can wash windows, empty trashcans, etc.
I'm glad we can agree on that. lol