Feminism: Is it a bad thing?

Started by Surtur9 pages
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]There are studies that show that being a Leftist Progressive does actually lower your testosterone. So yeah. Being a Beta Cuck makes you more likely to be a Leftist. [/B]

People at Buzzfeed found out this the hard way....

Originally posted by Surtur
Buzzfeed Crew Shocked To Learn They Have Low Testosterone Levels

😆

Originally posted by Surtur
People at Buzzfeed found out this the hard way....

OH I doubt they found it very "HARD" at all!!!!!!!

😱

Only the Asian dude came anywhere close to normal testosterone levels...damn.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]There are studies that show that being a Leftist Progressive does actually lower your testosterone. So yeah. Being a Beta Cuck makes you more likely to be a Leftist. [/B]
I found out that the guys on buzzfeed have testosterone levels of around 200 to 300.

Healthy is between 200 and 1100. ermm

Hi Time.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Your comment reminds me of this:

I laughed at that image. Dammit, it's so dumb but funny.

it's good for the lulz. don't want to expand on what feminism has done to many countries. it should be obvious. I'm definitely not going to open any minds so phuck it

There should be like a before and after for Tumblrinas.

Originally posted by Surtur
People at Buzzfeed found out this the hard way....

holy shiit. that was the buzzfeed crew? I've seen this proven true all the time in real life. really effeminate men tend to be more liberal.

Originally posted by Stigma
Feminism >>>>>> Second Wave Feminism > Third Wave Feminism

👆

Originally posted by Raisen
holy shiit. that was the buzzfeed crew? I've seen this proven true all the time in real life. really effeminate men tend to be more liberal. progressive

FTFY

Originally posted by Raisen
holy shiit. that was the buzzfeed crew? I've seen this proven true all the time in real life. really effeminate men tend to be more liberal.

Yep, 270 is the lowest you should have and only one was above it lol. The average is like 500-600. Anyways, this seems appropriate:

Originally posted by Raisen
holy shiit. that was the buzzfeed crew? I've seen this proven true all the time in real life. really effeminate men tend to be more liberal.

If you want to extrapolate from that sample, it could be argued, yes. 👆

But imho it is still rather small sample to reach definite conclusions.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yep, 270 is the lowest you should have and only one was above it lol. The average is like 500-600. Anyways, this seems appropriate:

I bet she'd be awesome in bed.

Originally posted by Stigma
If you want to extrapolate from that sample, it could be argued, yes. 👆

But imho it is still rather small sample to reach definite conclusions.

Have you seen nu-males?

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Have you seen nu-males?

The what?

EDIT: Ok, Googled it. Well...that is a sight to behold.

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Nu-male

**** it, ED probably will tell you all you need to know.

My checklist: glasses, neck beard, receding hairline, fat, feminist qualities, whiney, card games, some weird pony fetish etc.

At the next big debate between a republican and democrat I just want the repub to flat out ask their opponent how many genders they think there are.

Just let them essentially defeat themselves, all you need to do is give their crazy ideas a platform.

Watch as the people who claim to be all about science give you an answer that has nothing to do with it and everything to do with feelings.

^ What I want to see is a political competition where you can not attack your opponent. No BS campaign ads slandering the opposition. No digging up their skeletons. Just debate the issues that will affect our country and prove to the American people why you have the best solutions. I don't think that is too much to ask.

Originally posted by socool8520
^ What I want to see is a political competition where you can not attack your opponent. No BS campaign ads slandering the opposition. No digging up their skeletons. Just debate the issues that will affect our country and prove to the American people why you have the best solutions. I don't think that is too much to ask.
That is exactly what Trump tried to do...

"If honesty was suddenly introduced into politics the whole system would break down!" - George Carlin 1996

^ Did he not drag out sexual assault victims in front of Hillary? Not exactly the higher ground is it? They were both attacking each other as has been the case for a while now. it's sad the a political debate looks alarmingly similar to a schoolyard shit talk session.

Originally posted by socool8520
^ What I want to see is a political competition where you can not attack your opponent. No BS campaign ads slandering the opposition. No digging up their skeletons. Just debate the issues that will affect our country and prove to the American people why you have the best solutions. I don't think that is too much to ask.

Yes, I'd be okay with running a "gotta run a clean campaign" rule.