Well....lol. They're removing any independent scientists that have received EPA grants in favour of inudstry paid lobbyists because they worry about transparency?
The legacy of Donald Trump will not be all this Russia scandal bullshit. It will be the long lasting damage his appointments will cause to the well being of America.
Just imagine talking to the press and your constituents with a straight face that this is for their benefit? Like, I can't even fathom how big of a POS you have to be to do this. Up there with Pai and the FCC. Some truly sad developments.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Well....lol. They're removing any independent scientists that have received EPA grants in favour of inudstry paid lobbyists because they worry about transparency?The legacy of Donald Trump will not be all this Russia scandal bullshit. It will be the long lasting damage his appointments will cause to the well being of America.
Just imagine talking to the press and your constituents with a straight face that this is for their benefit? Like, I can't even fathom how big of a POS you have to be to do this. Up there with Pai and the FCC. Some truly sad developments.
Trump's policies and the actions of his picks get little to no attention in comparison to say, Trump tweeting at Baldwin.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Well....lol. They're removing any independent scientists that have received EPA grants in favour of inudstry paid lobbyists because they worry about transparency?The legacy of Donald Trump will not be all this Russia scandal bullshit. It will be the long lasting damage his appointments will cause to the well being of America.
Just imagine talking to the press and your constituents with a straight face that this is for their benefit? Like, I can't even fathom how big of a POS you have to be to do this. Up there with Pai and the FCC. Some truly sad developments.
Sadly, spot on. But the Trumpers on the bus cheer regardless
Originally posted by Surtur
Did others prove points when they responded to stories with comments of "impeach this person" ?Of course they did, you'd be consistent.
^
Anything to deflect away and avoid talking about Trump’s crappy policies.
It’s like he believes being a Trumper will somehow shield him from his internet privacy being sold off, his medical history used against him, guarantee him clean air/water, corporations having more rights than him after they screwed him over etc. Poor sport doesn't realize he's in the same boat as the rest of us.
Originally posted by Robtard
^Anything to deflect away and avoid talking about Trump’s crappy policies.
It’s like he believes being a Trumper will somehow shield him from his internet privacy being sold off, his medical history used against him, guarantee him clean air/water, corporations having more rights than him after they screwed him over etc. Poor sport doesn't realize he's in the same boat as the rest of us.
Did others prove points by pulling the same yes or no?
Originally posted by Robtard
Just tell me you realize you're not magically exempt from these shit policy changes, but still decide to deflect whenever something not favourable from Trump comes up cos reasons.
Did others prove points by pulling the same yes or no? It's not a difficult question.
We can surely continue to go back and forth until you answer it, though.