Originally posted by BackFire
So Alabama is probably going to send a guy who only sometimes attempts to engage in pedophilia to the Senate. Good look for them.
Correction: Someone who was twice removed from office for ethics violations, who is also accused of having sex with a 14-year-old and other teenagers.
HANNITY: But you don’t specifically remember having any girlfriend that was in her late teens even at that time?MOORE: I don’t remember that and I don’t remember ever dating any girl without the permission of her mother and I think in her statement she said that her mother actually encouraged her to go out with me.
wow
Originally posted by dadudemon
My great grandmother got married at 14 and had her first kid at 15. I believe her husband was 17 when they got married.My point is, her mother came from a different time. We don't have to get married at 14 anymore.
And I do wonder why they waited so long to come out. Was it just because it is trendy now, because celebs are going down?
It's not like the guy has an election coming up in early December.(oh, he does, shit)
Oh and I saw this one segment on CNN where people freaked out for even questioning these accusers. One woman is boycotting Fox because they did a report showing one of the accusers used to work for Hilary Clinton. This was not false, it was true, but even a true story is enough to set SJWs off.
Some people on the panel got all pissed at even QUESTIONING them. F*ck that. We cannot have it so these people can't even be questioned.
Just to note, I am not saying they are automatically wrong, I am merely saying is they are not sacrosanct, they can be questioned.
Originally posted by Surtur
And I do wonder why they waited so long to come out. Was it just because it is trendy now, because celebs are going down?It's not like the guy has an election coming up in early December.(oh, he does, shit)
Oh and I saw this one segment on CNN where people freaked out for even questioning these accusers. One woman is boycotting Fox because they did a report showing one of the accusers used to work for Hilary Clinton. This was not false, it was true, but even a true story is enough to set SJWs off.
Some people on the panel got all pissed at even QUESTIONING them. F*ck that. We cannot have it so these people can't even be questioned.
What year did the events of the accusation occur in? 1984?
82?
That is a very long time to wait. And there's no evidence, right? If he admits it, and the statute of limitations doesn't matter, then what happens? He goes to prison?
Likely, he's a creeper. I think he really did bad things. But that is my uninformed opinion.
Originally posted by dadudemon
What year did the events of the accusation occur in? 1984?82?
That is a very long time to wait. And there's no evidence, right? If he admits it, and the statute of limitations doesn't matter, then what happens? He goes to prison?
Likely, he's a creeper. I think he really did bad things. But that is my uninformed opinion.
1979 I think. Gee, weird they pop up now.
As we all know: eye witness accounts just get more reliable as time passes.
Originally posted by Surtur
1979 I think. Gee, weird they pop up now.
That's a very very long time ago. Yes, her mother might be old enough to come from the same time as my great grandmother. It was much more normal for someone that young to be married off in the South. It wasn't super common, but it was not rare. And the daughter would usually go off and live on the farm with the husband while the husband did farming with his family business.
Was that the case, here? No. It wasn't. But the mother may have still had the archaic ideas about marrying the daughter off quickly when she "came of age."
Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a very very long time ago. Yes, her mother might be old enough to come from the same time as my great grandmother. It was much more normal for someone that young to be married off in the South. It wasn't super common, but it was not rare. And the daughter would usually go off and live on the farm with the husband while the husband did farming with his family business.Was that the case, here? No. It wasn't. But the mother may have still had the archaic ideas about marrying the daughter off quickly when she "came of age."
Has this guy admitted to doing this? Are these just accusations? It is hard to say. He seems to be saying he doesn't remember.
I see two options. 1- He did these things and the Weinstein scandal made his victims come out. 2-He didn't do these things and his political opponents used the scandal to their advantage, because they know liberal dipshits will scream and whine if you dare question any of them. So once an accusation is out there...you are victim blaming if you dare question it.
Thing is, the Dems behavior makes #2 a legit possibility.
Originally posted by Surtur
Has this guy admitted to doing this? Are these just accusations? It is hard to say. He seems to be saying he doesn't remember.I see two options. 1- He did these things and the Weinstein scandal made his victims come out. 2-He didn't do these things and his political opponents used the scandal to their advantage, because they know liberal dipshits will scream and whine if you dare question any of them. So once an accusation is out there...you are victim blaming if you dare question it.
Thing is, the Dems behavior makes #2 a legit possibility.
Why doesn't he outright deny it?
Originally posted by Surtur
Either he is guilty or he thinks it is possible someone he f*cked in the past could have potentially lied about their age to him.
But that doesn't jive with a guilt-free past.
If he was a sociopath or did nothing wrong, he could easily deny it. Why doesn't he? That's my problem.
He's probably guilty like Sandusky who just refused to deny it.
Originally posted by dadudemon
But that doesn't jive with a guilt-free past.If he was a sociopath or did nothing wrong, he could easily deny it. Why doesn't he? That's my problem.
He's probably guilty like Sandusky who just refused to deny it.
I have seen varying reports. Some where he seems to deny it, others are weird.
Either he did what is being claimed or he did something else and he is just covering for that. By the "something else" I mean something that might upset his Christian voter base.