Mass Shootings in America Thread · General Discussion Forum

Firefly218 Restricted

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Cause SEX has a FUNCTION!
And that FUNCTION isn't FUN!!!!!!
[/B]

You must be a blast at parties. Lol, probly no one invites the buzzkill fascist to parties tho

Surtur Restricted

Firefly you know what would help a woman keep someones hands off her body?

A gun.

Flyattractor Senior Member

Originally posted by Firefly218
You must be a blast at parties. Lol, probly no one invites the buzzkill fascist to parties tho

More fun then the type I bet you go to .

But then I go to REAL Parties. Not Twitter Facebook On Line Parties.

Gotta Love how FascistFly VALUES Life like he does.

Oh wait. No. He Don't.

😱

Surtur Restricted

Originally posted by Firefly218
You must be a blast at parties. Lol, probly no one invites the buzzkill fascist to parties tho

A true fascist probably doesn't give someone the option of whether or not to invite them.

Mussolini didn't get party invites, dude just showed up. Learn your history.

Firefly218 Restricted

Originally posted by Surtur
Firefly you know what would help a woman keep someones hands off her body?
A gun.

Ok, but unless she needs to fight an army she doesn't need an ak-47 or bazooka

Firefly218 Restricted

Originally posted by Surtur
A true fascist probably doesn't give someone the option of whether or not to invite them.
Mussolini didn't get party invites, dude just showed up. Learn your history.

The only party FlyAttractor gets invited to is the Nazi party lol

Bashar Teg Senior Mentat

fly only surfaces from his basement when he has to buy more drugs

Flyattractor Senior Member

Originally posted by Firefly218
Ok, but unless she needs to fight an army she doesn't need an ak-47 or bazooka

Somehow I doubt she would need a gun to keep your hands off her. Her pointing and Laughing is probably more then enough....

Originally posted by Firefly218
The only party FlyAttractor gets invited to is the Nazi party lol

YouTube video

Surtur Restricted

Originally posted by Firefly218
Ok, but unless she needs to fight an army she doesn't need an ak-47 or bazooka

You can't prove this.

Flyattractor Senior Member

Originally posted by Surtur
You can't prove this.

That is one of the True Functions of Sex can Prove.

😱

Firefly218 Restricted

Originally posted by Surtur
You can't prove this.

You can't prove that she doesn't need ballistic missiles, so what's your point? I'm sure having missiles would come in handy for this hypothetical woman right? But the reason we wouldn't allow that is because the destructive potential of these missiles is too high to justify making it available to the public right?

At this point though, if you disagree I'm not gonna try to change your mind

Silent Master Senior Member

Originally posted by Firefly218
Ok, but unless she needs to fight an army she doesn't need an ak-47 or bazooka

What do you think is the absolute most she would need to defend herself?

Flyattractor Senior Member

Originally posted by Silent Master
What do you think is the absolute most she would need to defend herself?

In Canada all you need is a Whistle.

Darkstorm Zero Master of all Decepticons

YouTube video

Because there is no kill.... like overkill.

SquallX Senior Member

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
YouTube video
Because there is no kill.... like overkill.

I have yet to watch Jackie Brown.

Flyattractor Senior Member

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
YouTube video
Because there is no kill.... like overkill.

Its called GUSTO!!!!

Originally posted by SquallX
I have yet to watch Jackie Brown.

I saw it once back when it hit the Dollar Theater, but it was pretty good.

Sin I AM Madame Mort

Originally posted by SquallX
I have yet to watch Jackie Brown.

damn good movie...its no resevoir dogs but a fun ride nonetheless

SquallX Senior Member

Originally posted by Firefly218
A woman has the right to choose whether or not she wants to host an embryo

Not really. She’s only responsible for half of that decisions, the other being the male. For it takes two to have kids.

Now, am neither pro life, nor pro choice, but I do believe a woman can’t just go and get an abortion without the man knowing and consenting too.

What if the man wanted that child? Should it not be considers a crime if the woman says **** you to the man and still have an abortion?

Now reverse it. What if the woman wants the child, and the man doesn’t? Do you force the man to take of said child when he wants nothing to do with them?

On a funny note
/UCftJ8Hf0kI

SquallX Senior Member

Originally posted by Sin I AM
damn good movie...its no resevoir dogs but a fun ride nonetheless

People have been telling me that for yrs, and every time I say it watch it on a weekend, I either forgets, or just to lazy to search for it.

Surtur Restricted

Originally posted by Firefly218
You can't prove that she doesn't need ballistic missiles, so what's your point? I'm sure having missiles would come in handy for this hypothetical woman right? But the reason we wouldn't allow that is because the destructive potential of these missiles is too high to justify making it available to the public right?
At this point though, if you disagree I'm not gonna try to change your mind

Do you feel someone comparing guns to bazookas should be taken seriously?

Lol, I bet you genuinely do.