Mass Shootings in America Thread

Started by Putinbot1264 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
You're again showing you're not very bright. There is no GTA scenario. I never said I carry a bat around. There is no way I'd encounter you by chance. It would have to be planned.

And again: if you tried to get violent over words I'd take a bat to you. It's that simple. I'd defend myself and swing for homeruns.

haha you'd have to walk round with it ***** aka GTA. That said you'd better hit me with it with your first swing or I would take it from you. I'm 250 odd pounds of muscle and you are disabled. And if you tried after inciting a breach of the peace and GBH under British law I'd be well within my rights to use reasonable force which would go truly badly for you. Personally, as you try and swing the bat I suspect I would have kicked you to bits anyway, bats are heavy for the disabled even field by right wing violent thoughts.

choose your replies more carefully whirly, he's got a bat

Originally posted by Putinbot1
haha you'd have to walk round with it ***** aka GTA. That said you'd better hit me with it with your first swing or I would take it from you. I'm 250 odd pounds of muscle and you are disabled. And if you tried after inciting a breach of the peace and GBH under British law I'd be well within my rights to use reasonable force which would go truly badly for you. Personally, as you try and swing the bat I suspect I would have kicked you to bits anyway, bats are heavy for the disabled even field by right wing violent thoughts.

I would certainly have to walk with it to meet you, but we got baseball fields all around so carrying a bat in this neighborhood doesn't get you stopped by the cops.

And yes bro: I'd connect with the first swing. I'd only need one. And as for being heavy nah: I have a nice metal bat from my baseball days, very lightweight. It would do the job.

And bro as I said: we would never be dealing with british law, ever. I'd never come to your shithole.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
choose your replies more carefully whirly, he's got a bat
He has a bat and he says he knows how to use it. Funny thing is he thinks if he gers out a weapon it might not spiral things up further. He is such a fantasist.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
He has a bat and he says he knows how to use it. Funny thing is he thinks if he gers out a weapon it might not spiral things up further. He is such a fantasist.

If you attack me first all bets are off, I'd respond in kind and defend myself. And, as you've pointed out, I have issues with my back so me using a baseball bat to defend myself would probably be seen in a different light than some random dude using one.

So hey lol I don't feel bad at all that I'd use a bat to defend myself from a cowardly piece of shit who'd attack over words. And again: it would never be in Britain so do not cling to British law. Here? I'd get away with it if you attacked first.

Warriors, warriors, come out to play. You live in a fantasy kid, people get punched in the face every day for being *****. Cowards with bats I'm sure do exist, but if they are cowardly enough to need a bat, they'll get beaten up anyway.

If I punched you kid trust me you wouldn't be swinging your bat.

Says the guy who thinks he is Captain Lefty. Others live in a "fantasy World" yeah RIGHT!!!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Says the guy who thinks he is Captain Lefty. Others live in a "fantasy World" yeah RIGHT!!!! [/B]

Lol bingo. This guy thinks he is some super bad ass but he's only an internet tough guy.

It's always "alleged". I know there's legal reasons, but come on.

Nothing alleged about it, this guys a shooter.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Also... people are trying to attack and deplatform gab over this

That is what happens when you create a platform that facilitates criminal behavior. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Didn't the guy also post on Twitter?

Yes. Everyone that posts on twitter has the capability and capacity to become a MURDER!

Twitter must be banned.

What is gab?

A website meant to be a free speech alternative to twitter.

Basically amidst a lot of these platforms' more recent tendencies towards censorship, and complaints about them on both free speech grounds and on the grounds of the censorship being executed with an obvious political violence.

People complained about this, and the response was "well just make your own platform." So Gab was created as a free speech platform where anyone can say or post anything as long as it doesn't violate the law. The idea was to create a space on the internet governed by the same free speech principles as the American public square, and as mentioned earlier it functions similarly to twitter in its structure, just without the censorship.

It's been repeatedly smeared as some alt-right/far right website... even though it's an open platform that doesn't express support for the alt-right or only allow the alt-right, but merely extends something of a universal free speech principle to anyone who uses it. The media has in large part attacked Gab because Gab doesn't employ the use of censorship as a tool for what the media consider their political agenda.

Well it turns out the recent synagogue shooter posted on Gab, and so attacks on Gab from the press have pressured the domain hosting them into deplatforming the website as a whole. Never mind the fact that the owner of Gab immediately took the initiative in going to the FBI to provide everything they had on the guy without being asked to do so. Never mind the fact that this guy had also posted shit on facebook and facebook is facing no repercussion or outrage for it.

There was also some outrage over the fact that the shooter was verified on Gab. Though the people complaining about it either don't understand or won't be honest about the fact that verified status on Gab doesn't work the same as verified status on Twitter. Rather than being a badge of honor or prestige like Twitter's blue checkmark, verification on Gab literally exists for the purpose of serving as evidence that the person whose posting under a name is actually that person, and all that's required to be verified is providing proof of identity, so anyone can do it. It's not some mark of endorsement or prestige or some shit, it's literally just verification that the person posting is the person who they claim to be.

Gab's account on medium also posted a statement on medium after the mass shooting happened, a statement which categorically condemned the mass shooting... and then medium decided to deplatform Gab's account and remove their statement. Far be it from me to understand why a denouncement of terrorism should be deplatformed... maybe Gab condemning terrorism and violence is not convenient to their narrative that Gab is evil?

Thus far it seems like Gab is under a coordinated attack, and have had to juggle the hosting of their website through Microsoft, Joylent, and Godaddy, all of which have deplatformed them. They have been banned from online monetary transactions by GoFundMe, Paypal, and Stripe. And they have been banned from Google and Apple's app stores.

Fundamentally they have come under multi-corporate assault for the moral crime of acting as a free speech platform operating under the same principles as the first amendment, with everything from their app sharing, financial transactions, website hosting, and a post condemning terrorism and violence having been revoked, banned, or deplatformed.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
That is what happens when you create a platform that facilitates criminal behavior. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

How does it explicitly allows criminal behavior?

Cryptocurrencies are friendly towards criminal activities and don't get much flak.

Originally posted by Bentley
How does it explicitly allows criminal behavior?

Cryptocurrencies are friendly towards criminal activities and don't get much flak.


True, bitcoin can buy you some good LSD off the darknet

Originally posted by Emperordmb
True, bitcoin can buy you some good LSD off the darknet

I've often wondered how you get onto the darkweb without going on the internet first. Like, the only way I could imagine doing it would be to type 'how to get on the darkweb' into a Google search engine. Seems about as silly as asking a shopkeeper if you can shoplift.

Originally posted by Surtur
If you attack me first all bets are off, I'd respond in kind and defend myself. And, as you've pointed out, I have issues with my back so me using a baseball bat to defend myself would probably be seen in a different light than some random dude using one.

So hey lol I don't feel bad at all that I'd use a bat to defend myself from a cowardly piece of shit who'd attack over words. And again: it would never be in Britain so do not cling to British law. Here? I'd get away with it if you attacked first.

Surt, no one buys you as a badass with a bat. You live in delusional land like trump.