Uranium One Controversy: Trump, Clinton, Lies, Oh My!

Started by dadudemon3 pages

Uranium One Controversy: Trump, Clinton, Lies, Oh My!

Watch this video on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/mmfa/status/930551622849118208

Watch the whole thing.

And thus ends the false accusations, from Trump, levied against Hillary Clinton, about the US Selling Uranium to Russia: never happened. It's bullshit. Trump lied. Or Trump's people lied.

So the Uranium One "debate" should end.

If we want to pretend any uranium is being sold to to the Russians, then it is on Obama because he would have the most individual power in that "deal."

Also, as some Russian dude said, to grossly paraphrase him: "Why would we need to buy uranium form Americans? We have plenty."

Lol, that Fox News guy Shep Smith seems to have a smidgen of integrity. It’s almost refreshing.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Lol, that Fox News guy Shep Smith seems to have a smidgen of integrity. It’s almost refreshing.

naturally, trumpers are taking to social media and demanding his firing. kinda

Lol I saw that, owned.

Oh Trumpers...

I wonder if had this report came from a "liberal-leaning" news source, would Trumpers scream FAKE NEWS???

Originally posted by Firefly218
I wonder if had this report came from a "liberal-leaning" news source, would Trumpers scream FAKE NEWS???

You don't wonder that at all, you know they would, because you've seen it happen time and time again. If say Rachel Maddow had done this report, Surtur would have posted it in the Triggered thread and insulted her.

Originally posted by Firefly218
I wonder if had this report came from a "liberal-leaning" news source, would Trumpers scream FAKE NEWS???

If they want Shep fired over this then probably.

Originally posted by Robtard
You don't wonder that at all, you know they would, because you've seen it happen time and time again. If say Rachel Maddow had done this report, Surtur would have posted it in the Triggered thread and insulted her.

I just can't help laughing at the fact you seem to think nobody here has ever dismissed a site because it was right wing lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
I just can't help laughing at the fact you seem to think nobody here has ever dismissed a site because it was right wing lol.

Except I didn't say that or anything remotely close to it. So once again you're making up shit arguments, applying it to me and then attacking that. Very weak tactic, imo.

You're also one of the people who made a stink about the 'Uranium Deal', connecting it to Clinton, Obama and Mueller, anyone you felt could make Trump look less shitty in a given situation. So it's pretty funny that you're now trying to back away from that.

Originally posted by Robtard
Except I didn't say that or anything remotely close to it. So once again you're making up shit arguments, applying it to me and then attacking that. Very weak tactic, imo.

So you agree both sides here pull that tactic, okie dokie.

You're also one of the people who made a stink about the 'Uranium Deal', connecting it to Clinton, Obama and Mueller, anyone you felt could make Trump look less shitty in a given situation. So it's pretty funny that you're now trying to back away from that.

Quote me backing away from anything.

Originally posted by Surtur
So you agree both sides here pull that tactic, okie dokie.

Quote me backing away from anything.

My comment which made you flip didn't touch on that either, once again you're inventing things I didn't say or comment on.

So to be clear, you're still on the uranium conspiracy shady thing? Yes or no.

Originally posted by Firefly218
I wonder if had this report came from a "liberal-leaning" news source, would Trumpers scream FAKE NEWS???

For me, this was the most visceral point of it all: Came from Fox News. 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
My comment which made you flip didn't touch on that either, once again you're inventing things I didn't say or comment on.

So then we won't dance around it and we'll see how seriously your original comment should be taken: do you think people on both sides here have done what you described?

So to be clear, you're still on the "Clinton sold Uranium to Putin" shady thing? Yes or no.

I'd seen the story about Shep, but never read any details nor did I watch the video. If DDM is saying it shows proof there is nothing to the scandal I trust him.

There's nothing to back away from though. I'm certainly not going to deny I wanted it investigated. I had zero reason to post in the thread at all if my intention was to distance myself from it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
For me, this was the most visceral point of it all: Came from Fox News. 🙂

It does seem like FOX tries to be more balanced than the other big networks, isn't that f*cking weird? I just mean...considering how much the network tends to get shit on.

Originally posted by Surtur
So then we won't dance around it and we'll see how seriously your original comment should be taken: do you think people on both sides here have done what you described?

I'd seen the story about Shep, but never read any details nor did I watch the video. If DDM is saying it shows proof there is nothing to the scandal I trust him.

There's nothing to back away from though. I'm certainly not going to deny I wanted it investigated. I had zero reason to post in the thread at all if my intention was to distance myself from it.

My comment has proof though; it's your posting history.

But you didn't want it "just investigated", which is a sensible approach imo, you outright condemned Clinton for it as if it were true sans proof.

Proof:

Originally posted by Surtur
Still loving the people trying to tie Trump to Russia. I mean hey Trump DID sell Russia some uranium and shit, right?

Oh wait, that was Hilary. But no let's just talk about Trumps potential ties to Europe. Deflector shields up!

Originally posted by Surtur
On the other hand if Hilary will lie about..all the shit she has lied about, who is to say she won't lie to us about other stuff too? Like foreign relations? You know..how she conveniently says Trump is in bed with Russia and ignores all her dealings with Russia, like selling them uranium.
Originally posted by Surtur
I dunno, maybe if she becomes president Hilldawg could sell the Russians a lot more uranium than she already has.
Originally posted by Surtur
If Hilary goes to war with Russia I guess she'd need to find someone else to give uranium to.
Originally posted by Surtur
It would be silly for Hilary to go to war with Russia...after she helped them get all that uranium. Silly Hilary.
Originally posted by Surtur
Why would she give Uranium to a country whose leader she didn't have a ton of respect for?
Originally posted by Surtur
If only they'd included a "don't hack us" clause when they sold them uranium.
Originally posted by Surtur
Of course she wants a more positive relationship with Russia. It's hard to sell uranium to someone you have a negative relationship with.

Originally posted by Surtur
Why would she want to provoke them?

I mean okay, pop quiz: do you want to buy uranium from a douchebag? No, you wanna buy your uranium from a decent person. You want to buy your uranium from someone you get along with.

Originally posted by Surtur
Russian did everything possible to get Trump into the White House? Damn, Hilary should have given them a better price on all that uranium then.

There's more, but I think that's more than enough to show how disingenuous you're being now.

Yeah we should let this conversation slide into the Hillary email server though🙂

So I can get all #triggered!

Rob, I find it remarkable you say I'm being disingenuous.

Most of those are from before this scandal even became a thing. Several of them were said in jest. I mean holy shit:

"If Hilary goes to war with Russia I guess she'd need to find someone else to give uranium to. "

Lol.

So yes, once this scandal was being pushed I wanted it investigated. Anything else?

Originally posted by Robtard
My comment has proof though; it's your posting history.

But you didn't want it "just investigated", which is a sensible approach imo, you outright condemned Clinton for it as if it were true sans proof.

Proof:

...

There's more, but I think that's more than enough to show how disingenuous you're being now.

Damn, dude....that's "pre-2013 dadudemon" levels of dedication to pwning.

Originally posted by Surtur
Rob, I find it remarkable you say I'm being disingenuous.

Most of those are from before this scandal even became a thing. Several of them were said in jest.

Surtur, it's clear you were certain about the Clinton/Uranium conspiracy, the quotes show that. Be a man and own up to it for once.