Majority of Hillary Voters Think Bill Clinton Committed Sexual Assault Crimes

Originally posted by Silent Master
So no, you don't have any verifiable proof that she as telling the truth. just your pro Hillary bias. BTW, she didn't help or protect any of the women who accused Bill. she routinely attacked their character.

Originally posted by Robtard
Classic Trumper approach: Everything out of Hillary's mouth is a lie until proven true. Everything out of Trump's mouth is truth until proven a lie, and even when he accidentally admits he's lying, it's often dismissed

end thread

But we aren't going to ignore the fact that her tactic of "I didn't know" is getting old are we?

Not sure she did a "I didn't know" more so that she believed Bill's side of the sexual predator allegations. She clearly knew about the cheating, as noted, Bill has a history of stepping outside his marriage, one case landed him lying about it and being impeached. Can't really ignore that one.

If you want to call her a fool, moron and/or bag of shit for believing her husband's side of the story when it comes to the rape-y criminal behavior, go ahead. But to equate that to an actual rapist like Trump is a stretch. Bill and Trump are the sexual predators, Trump bragged it no less

Originally posted by Firefly218
Hillary Clinton is an inspiring figure and has handled the pitfalls of politics with extraordinary grace and aplomb, especially as a woman in a characteristically masculine arena

LOL!!!

TIL cheating is kinda the same as sexual harassment and rape coz reasons.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure she did a "I didn't know" more so that she believed Bill's side of the sexual predator allegations. She clearly knew about the cheating, as noted, Bill has a history of stepping outside his marriage, one case landed him lying about it and being impeached. Can't really ignore that one.

If you want to call her a fool, moron and/or bag of shit for believing her husband's side of the story when it comes to the rape-y criminal behavior, go ahead. But to equate that to an actual rapist like Trump is a stretch.

I think they are both shit bags when it comes to telling the truth, but, yes actual rape would be worse than covering for your husband's rape. not much though.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
TIL cheating is kinda the same as sexual harassment and rape coz reasons.

Bill was accused of sexual assault as well was he not?

Originally posted by socool8520
Bill was accused of sexual assault as well was he not?

yeah yeah...hillary should have known he was a rapist because he cheated on her. yes i get it, but it's f*cking stupid.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
yeah yeah...hillary should have known he was a rapist because he cheated on her. yes i get it, but it's f*cking stupid.

That's not what I said at all. I said he was also accused of sexual assault wasn't he?

you did.

Originally posted by socool8520
But we aren't going to ignore the fact that her tactic of "I didn't know" is getting old are we?

not interested in your trolling tactics so practice them on someone else, k sport?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you did.

not interested in your trolling tactics so practice them on someone else, k sport?

No, you're just incapable of admitting your own bias and get all pissy pants when called out on it. It's cool man, no judgement.

that's nice

Originally posted by socool8520
I think they are both shit bags when it comes to telling the truth, but, yes actual rape would be worse than covering for your husband's rape. not much though.

Covering for a rapist you know is guilty is about the same, imo. Like the people who defend pedos when they know they're pedos. If you're helping the rapist rape, you're really not much better, again, my opinion here.

But the point is: while Clinton knew about Bill's cheating, did she actually believe the rape allegations or did she believe her husband when he denied those acts weren't consensual?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that's nice

I said no judgement.

Originally posted by Robtard
Covering for a rapist you know is guilty is about the same, imo. Like the people who defend pedos when they know they're pedos. If you're helping the rapist rape, you're really not much better, again, my opinion here.

But the point is: while Clinton knew about Bill's cheating, did she actually believe the rape allegations or did she believe her husband when he denied those acts weren't consensual?

Well, that would make her extremely gullible given the fact that he has already shown poor judgement with all of his scandals wouldn't it?

And then to attack the accusers when you know full well what kind of guy your husband is not a great idea imo.

Don't get me wrong, I could easily see Trump being guilty of what he's accused, and if he is, he deserves to be in prison. I'm not defending him, I just don't get the defense for Hillary

Originally posted by socool8520
Well, that would make her extremely gullible given the fact that he has already shown poor judgement with all of his scandals wouldn't it?

And then to attack the accusers when you know full well what kind of guy your husband is not a great idea imo.

Don't get me wrong, I could easily see Trump being guilty of what he's accused, and if he is, he deserves to be in prison. I'm not defending him, I just don't get the defense for Hillary

This is sort of assuming that she connects Bill to being a rapist because he cheats a lot. That's a weird stretch. Being a serial cheater doesn't mean you're also a sexual predator in of itself. Two different animals.

Again, if she legitimately believed Bill and that his cheating was with willing partners, why wouldn't she defend her husband against rape allegations? Wouldn't you if someone accused your spouse of rape and you believed your spouse.

Because you're mixing the two. Bill is a sexual predator. Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton defended Bill's sexual predations from the mindset that he didn't rape.

So the real point you should be asking yourself, do you believe Hillary believed her husband Bill's side or do you believe Hillary believed the women and attacked them anyways. One is forgivable, the other isn't.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is sort of assuming that she connects Bill to being a rapist because he cheats a lot. That's a weird stretch. Being a serial cheater doesn't mean you're also a sexual predator in of itself. Two different animals.

Again, if she legitimately believed Bill and that his cheating was with willing partners, why wouldn't she defend her husband against rape allegations? Wouldn't you if someone accused your spouse of rape and you believed your spouse.

Because you're mixing the two. Bill is a sexual predator. Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton defended Bill's sexual predations from the mindset that he didn't rape.

So the real point you should be asking yourself, do you believe Hillary believed her husband Bill's side or do you believe Hillary believed the women and attacked them anyways. One is forgivable, the other isn't.

It's not that much of a stretch in Bill's case. Sure, had only one person come forward, then having a strong faith in your husband is understandable. Multiple women though? and he was a serial cheater? Things should at least be lingering in the back of your mind. Enough so that you would second guess lashing out at the accusers publicly knowing your husband's lack of honesty.

You are correct though,they are two different things, but he lied about his indiscretions so it would seem foolish to me after multiple accusations that she would just believe him so readily and completely.

Given her track record with the IDK excuse, I would say it's the former. But given the scenario it is possible she believed him.

Originally posted by socool8520
It's not that much of a stretch in Bill's case. Sure, had only one person come forward, then having a strong faith in your husband is understandable. Multiple women though? and he was a serial cheater? Things should at least be lingering in the back of your mind. Enough so that you would second guess lashing out at the accusers publicly knowing your husband's lack of honesty.

You are correct though,they are two different things, but he lied about his indiscretions so it would seem foolish to me after multiple accusations that she would just believe him so readily and completely.

Given her track record with the IDK excuse, I would say it's the former. But given the scenario it is possible she believed him.

Again, it's not unheard of for a wife/husband to believe their spouse, even in crazy situations.

Bill's clearly a sexual predator in my mind, but I'm also not married to him. If I was maybe I'd believe him if he told me "I cheated on baby, but they all wanted it. But they don't mean a thing!".

Dunno, I've seen some whacked marriages (uncles, aunts, friends of family) growing up and the shit some spouses believe is insane.

Originally posted by socool8520
It's not that much of a stretch in Bill's case. Sure, had only one person come forward, then having a strong faith in your husband is understandable. Multiple women though? and he was a serial cheater? Things should at least be lingering in the back of your mind. Enough so that you would second guess lashing out at the accusers publicly knowing your husband's lack of honesty.

You are correct though,they are two different things, but he lied about his indiscretions so it would seem foolish to me after multiple accusations that she would just believe him so readily and completely.

Given her track record with the IDK excuse, I would say it's the former. But given the scenario it is possible she believed him.

Right, she either knew and was protecting him or she was delusional. either way, that type of person shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a leadership position.

That said, Trump is a piece of sh!t himself and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a leadership position either. that's why I supported Sanders.