Originally posted by Robtard
But wouldn't even one life lost over this be too much? How exactly do you put a value on lives? Explain.
But hey, maybe that's just my opinion and I tend to have what others consider to be a pretty screwed up outlook on life and death. Personally I place virtually no inherent value on human life. That's how I can be both pro choice AND believe that abortion is murder. Because while every child has the potential to grow up to cure cancer, they also have the potential to grow up to be the next Jeffrey Dahmer... and there's been a lot more serial killers born than people who've cured cancer.
Originally posted by Surtur
There are violent terrorists in their midst that actually don't need an excuse to do violence.So show me an increase in violence. A drastic one.
Ah, the special rules added: "a drastic one". Meaning whatever number is given, you will brush off as being insignificant or not high enough to matter.
So why don't you tell me what the magical number is and we'll go from there?
Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, the special rules added: "a drastic one". Meaning whatever number is given, you will brush off as being insignificant or not high enough to matter.So why don't you tell me what the magical number is and we'll go from there?
Lol, show me the drastic increase. Can you? Show me what you think is a drastic increase, and I will tell you if I agree. Go on.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, show me the drastic increase. Can you? Show me what you think is a drastic increase, and I will tell you if I agree. Go on.
I asked you to tell me what you would accept as being a "drastic" increase by your views and you respond by dodging and then asking me the same. LoLz.
Originally posted by Robtard
I asked you to tell me what you would accept as being a "drastic" increase by your views and you respond by dodging and then asking me the same. LoLz.
I've asked multiple times for evidence of a drastic increase in violence. I would have to see the figures and judge if they are drastic. Give them to me.
Your antics have been already covered in the post below:
Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, the special rules added: "a drastic one". Meaning whatever number is given, you will brush off as being insignificant or not high enough to matter.So why don't you tell me what the magical number is and we'll go from there?
Scores Dead in Gaza After U.S. Moves Embassy to Jerusalem
Gaza City, Gaza Strip—At least 52 Palestinians were killed and almost 1,960 others were wounded Monday after thousands protest the U.S. Embassy opening in Jerusalem.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[b]Scores Dead in Gaza After U.S. Moves Embassy to JerusalemGaza City, Gaza Strip—At least 52 Palestinians were killed and almost 1,960 others were wounded Monday after thousands protest the U.S. Embassy opening in Jerusalem. [/B]
My question was, "Why are they just throwing themselves as an obviously inevitable violent end?" Because saying you're going to invade and tear down the barbwire clearly has violent intentions. And people will die.
So is the Embassy move the cause of those deaths? Or are the organizers of those people the cause of those deaths? Organizing a violent protest that will 100% assuredly end in injury and loss of life seems like the faulty party. "Let's take up arms and rocks against the Israelis that will clearly result in some of us dying!" Who thinks this?
I don't blame the US Embassy move at all. I blame the riot-instigators.
But here's another problem: where do they go? The article says they need power, clean water, money, and food. So why can't that be provided? What about jobs to keep them busy? Surely there's something that can be done?
Out of sheer frustration and a desire to be heard I would imagine, as I doubt 40k people are simply nuts/suicidal.
The warhawks like Netanyahu don't want a two-state solution, so this is going to keep happening over and over and over. You treat people like less than animals, then wonder why they react.