Originally posted by Robtard
Surt,HYG:
👆 YW
And as I said: you enjoy that pretend victory Rob. Predicting what someone will say doesn't actually mean that person is right or wrong lol. That's a common tactic you try to use. But why would I or DDM ignore reality because a bunch of people online made comments? It's irrelevant.
Anyways, you have permission to enjoy the pretend victory 👆
Originally posted by Surtur
You enjoy that pretend victory, champ 👆
I really don't understand what Robtard's point. What does it accomplish? A self-righteous platitude? Hooray? He can grandstand on pedantry?
As far as the FBI and DHS is concerned, he's a terrorist.
Perpetrated by individuals and/or groups inspired by or associated with primarily U.S.-based movements that espouse extremist ideologies of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
--for example, the June 8, 2014 Las Vegas shooting, during which two police officers inside a restaurant were killed in an ambush-style attack, which was committed by a married couple who held anti-government views and who intended to use the shooting to start a revolution.
https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism
What did he accomplish or intend to accomplish with his supposed terrorism? Did anything change?
Originally posted by dadudemon
I really don't understand what Robtard's point. What does it accomplish? A self-righteous platitude? Hooray? He can grandstand on pedantry?As far as the FBI and DHS is concerned, he's a terrorist.
Perpetrated by individuals and/or groups inspired by or associated with primarily U.S.-based movements that espouse extremist ideologies of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
--for example, the June 8, 2014 Las Vegas shooting, during which two police officers inside a restaurant were killed in an ambush-style attack, which was committed by a married couple who held anti-government views and who intended to use the shooting to start a revolution.https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism
What did he accomplish or intend to accomplish with his supposed terrorism? Did anything change?
He wants a pretend victory lol. He wants to be able to say "ha, you proved me right!". I assume because he must feel that his predicting how people will react negates the reaction? I dunno. Oh it's an excuse to play the race card as well, you know they love to play that card.
Originally posted by Surtur
He wants a pretend victory lol. He wants to be able to say "ha, you proved me right!". I assume because he must feel that his predicting how people will react negates the reaction? I dunno. Oh it's an excuse to play the race card as well, you know they love to play that card.
^
Cool
Originally posted by Surtur
He wants a pretend victory lol. He wants to be able to say "ha, you proved me right!". I assume because he must feel that his predicting how people will react negates the reaction? I dunno. Oh it's an excuse to play the race card as well, you know they love to play that card.
Well, he's clearly mentally ill. And addressing his mental illness and people like him, is actually a solution that will prevent at the least, some of these situations.
So whatever self-righteous platitudes people want to grand-stand on or stupid arguments on the internet people want to make (Robtard), it's stupid as hell. It does not bring people back to life. However, improving our healthcare as it pertains to mental healthcare WILL address some of this.
"Hur dur, someone will say 'mental health' eehehegegegege." clown2
Sorry if facts and trying to resolve the problem offends you.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Well, he's clearly mentally ill. And addressing his mental illness and people like him, is actually a solution that will prevent at the least, some of these situations.So whatever self-righteous platitudes people want to grand-stand on or stupid arguments on the internet people want to make (Robtard), it's stupid as hell. It does not bring people back to life. However, improving our healthcare as it pertains to mental healthcare WILL address some of this.
"Hur dur, someone will say 'mental health' eehehegegegege." clown2
Sorry if facts and trying to resolve the problem offends you.
All true. Anyways, what is 2+2? I predict you are going to say 4!!!
Originally posted by SquallX
The Vegas shooting for one
The San Antonio killing of the copsThese two just pop in my head. There are far more examples if anyone on this site want to add if they desires.
Both shooters were left leaning, yet no one said anything about them
Stephen Paddock has no political or religious affiliation, and his motive for the shooting remains unknown.
The suspect in the San Antonio shooting was killed by police at the scene. His identity was not made public, and his motive remains unknown as well.
In neither of those instances did a liberal refuse to condemn the shooters, let alone condone their actions.
Want to try again?
Not necessarily, religious zealots often are acting specifically due to the explicit teachings of their religion. If you're raised in a househld/neibhorhood where the text is taken literally, you canbe perfectly sane and still commit seemingly justified atrocities.
Religions need to be reformed. Cherrypicking parts of a text to take literally and others to not covers up the problem. You need to actually remove the bad crap from the text.
Originally posted by Bentley
I think that of most muslim terrorist anyways.
I think many of them have to be brainwashed to pushed to that point, actually.
I'm not making this up:
Originally posted by dadudemon
I think many of them have to be brainwashed to pushed to that point, actually.I'm not making this up:
Plus all the inbreeding.
Minister: Muslim 'inbreeding' in Britain is causing massive surge in birth defects