Who should be allowed to vote?

Well then sure.

Of course presumably we're being facetious; disenfranchising almost half the voting population for supporting the "wrong" candidate is cancer to democracy lol.

Or is it weeding out traitors to our great nation? We don't allow convicts and parolees to vote. Food for thought.

There's a difference between committing a crime yourself and voting for someone who was later accused of and convicted for treason (hypothetically).

Yes, obviously, those can hide their actions under the ignorance "but we didn't know!" blanket. Even though this was a thing long before Nov 8th 2016.

I'm talking about the people (ie Trumpers) who will still be supporting Trump, in the hypothetical that Trump is found guilty.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, obviously, those can hide their actions under the ignorance "but we didn't know!" blanket. Even though this was a thing long before Nov 8th 2016.

I'm talking about the people (ie Trumpers) who will still be supporting Trump, in the hypothetical that Trump is found guilty.

Except they did know. Clinton raised the subject during the debates.

They can't "know" until the accusations are proven. Who's to differentiate between political slander and truth during presidential debates, lol?

Originally posted by SunRazer
They can't "know" until the accusations are proven. Who's to differentiate between political slander and truth during presidential debates, lol?

People with functioning brains. But do not take the word of our intelligence agencies for it, because Clinton was the messenger, amirite?

Name the accusations proven so we can discuss it. The actions of our intelligence agencies are questionable, specifically the FBI, so whining about that is naive.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
People with functioning brains. But do not take the word of our intelligence agencies for it, because Clinton was the messenger, amirite?

I'm not American, so I've not kept up to date with all of this, but last I heard, wasn't this still in the process of investigation?

And yes, nothing against Clinton herself, but her accusations aren't those of the intelligence agencies'. The idea that Clinton raising it up in the debates means we should ban everyone who voted for Trump for life is absurd.

Originally posted by Surtur
Name the accusations proven so we can discuss it. The actions of our intelligence agencies are questionable, specifically the FBI, so whining about that is naive.

It's a hypothetical "if Trump is found guilty", you silly bastard. So on those grounds, the accusations would be true. Again, it's a hypothetical. Jeez.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's a hypothetical "if Trump is found guilty", you silly bastard. So on those grounds, the accusations would be true. Again, it's a hypothetical. Jeez.

But this little dweeb is acting like it's fact. Next.

I mean where do we draw the line here? Should we have disenfranchised everyone who voted for Lincoln because he suspended habeas corpus to keep Maryland in the Union or do we see that as a necessary act for the greater good? What if Trump supporters argue Trump's hypothetical treason is necessary for the greater good?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I mean where do we draw the line here? Should we have disenfranchised everyone who voted for Lincoln because he suspended habeas corpus to keep Maryland in the Union or do we see that as a necessary act for the greater good? What if Trump supporters argue Trump's hypothetical treason is necessary for the greater good?

It doesn't matter lol. It truly doesn't and the reason is Trump. He drives them crazy. Stays rent free in their heads.

I bet these people would hold anyone who voted for Nixon responsible for Watergate.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
What if Trump supporters argue Trump's hypothetical treason is necessary for the greater good?

The "who cares if Trump colluded, it was to make America great again" flip has already been called. #collusionpivot

It's when people who are adamantly "there was no collusion!" ranters, suddenly don't care about the collusion once it's proven.

Originally posted by riv6672
Rights shouldnt be purchased. They should be earned.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
They are earned by paying taxes, you dip.

^

Surtur, read the above :0

Originally posted by Robtard
^

Surtur, read the above :0

Yes, and? Grow a sac and say your point. Go on 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
The "who cares if Trump colluded, it was to make America great again" flip has already been called. #collusionpivot

It's when people who are adamantly "there was no collusion!" ranters, suddenly don't care about the collusion once it's proven.

So it's about targeting people who flake on their arguments?

Except I do care about collusion, I don't want it. But I don't know f it is illegal. Alan Dershowitz says no.