Originally posted by Rockydonovang
I take it you didn't actually read Snowdragon's article?No, you actually agreed with Lazy Bones' false equivalency and mischaracterization of the events described by his article, and took no issue with him deflecting to Obama as an excuse for Trump's actions. Hence the 👆 emoji.
Why don't you stop trying to smear me with attempting to deflect on Obama when I have repeatedly characterized my opinion in the context of what Trump is doing?
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I don't care about anything Obama did, what I care about is whether or not Trump is pursuing action via suing within the current parameters of policy or trying to change policy. I could give less of a shit about what Obama did or deflections to Obama, what this really comes down to for me is that even though I think it's shitty, I'm not sounding the alarm over the President pursuing this issue if he's not crafting policy to do so.
Why don't you stop trying to smear me with attempting to deflect on Obama when I have repeatedly characterized my opinion in the context of what Trump is doing?I didn't realize pointing out the content of posts you imply agreement with was considered "smearing."
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
That was not the distinction being discussed in the post you gave an 👆 emoji to. So none of this is really relevant to my critique.
I didn't realize pointing out the content of posts you imply agreement with was considered "smearing."
The specific point about Trump suing rather than changing or enacting policy was made in the post I gave a thumbs up to which is essentially my point, though the Obama comparison was also there, which I don't really have any interest agreeing or disagreeing with.
Why don't you get some clarification on some of these things first before flying off the handle as you always do, desperate for a quick chance to give yourself the high ground and assume the worst about your opponent. It's annoying, and not the first time you've made incorrect presumptions about your opponent's stances.
You did clarify your position after initially misrepresenting it, so I don't really see any point to dragging this on longer.
This was rather unnecessary though:
Why don't you get some clarification on some of these things first before flying off the handle as you always do, desperate for a quick chance to give yourself the high ground and assume the worst about your opponent. It's annoying, and not the first time you've made incorrect presumptions about your opponent's stances.
You have shown me the intent of your post, so we have no further issue, aside from your paranoia about others trying to claim high ground on an online forum.