Oprah is seriously considering standing for POTUS

Continues to not get it and repeat himself like trump.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Continues to not get it and repeat himself like trump.

For someone who dislikes Trump you do share a lot in common 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
For someone who dislikes Trump you do share a lot in common 🙂

Now Alex Jones is going after her lol. Chris almighty.

Running scared.

Originally posted by Surtur
Dude, it was a scandal at the time. You can say it wasn't worthy of being a scandal, but it was. How is this hard to get?

Nah, you're just dense. If the winners didn't want to pay taxes on the prizes, they could just forfeit the prize. Though one would have to be stupid or broke to not pay a few thousand for a $30,000.00 car they could turn around and sell for an easy $18-20,000.00 or more.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nah, you're just dense. If the winners didn't want to pay taxes on the prizes, they could just forfeit the prize. Though one would have to be stupid or broke to not pay a few thousand for a $30,000.00 car they could turn around and sell for an easy $18-20,000.00 or more.

Nah, you just want an excuse to talk shit. I mentioned something that was a scandal at the time, you whined over it lol.

Doubt that she'll run.

If she did, though, she would probably win. In fact I think she'd probably win by huge margins if she made it through the primary.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nah, you're just dense. If the winners didn't want to pay taxes on the prizes, they could just forfeit the prize. Though one would have to be stupid or broke to not pay a few thousand for a $30,000.00 car they could turn around and sell for an easy $18-20,000.00 or more.

This reminds me of conservatives, who threatened under Obama, to artificially cap their earnings at $200,000. Because income below $200,000 is taxed at an effective rate of 15% and income above $200,000 is taxed at an effective rate of 25%. So instead of netting $207,500 on a $250,000 gross, they would rather net $170,000 on a $200,000 gross. It is like, do you even math, bro?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
This reminds me of conservatives, who threatened under Obama, to artificially cap their earnings at $200,000. Because income below $200,000 is taxed at an effective rate of 15% and income above $200,000 is taxed at an effective rate of 25%. So instead of netting $207,500 on a $250,000 gross, they would rather net $170,000 on a $200,000 gross. It is like, do you even math, bro?

Oh conservatives...

Originally posted by Robtard
Thanks to Trumpers who elected a man-child, the 'no experience needed, you just have to be a celebrity and rich' is now in play for the position of POTUS.

Not that I think Oprah would be worse than Trump, she at least made herself and didn't rely on a well connected multi-millionaire father to lift her up. But she should have started lower in politics to get some experience under her belt before.

Yes, Trump is absolutely terrible.

Oprah...I don't want my first female president to be Oprah. Can't it be some super amazing smart gal like Obama was (Obama wasn't a gal, you trolls, but he definitely was super amazing smart)?

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh conservatives...

They are too ignorant to understand that the first $200,000 is taxed at 15% and the next $50,000 is taxed at 25%.

They think the entire $250,000 is taxed at 25% because they do not understand how taxes work.

They would rather purposely bring home $37,500 less to spite Obama.

Yeah, that will really show him.

Originally posted by Robtard
Thanks to Trumpers who elected a man-child, the 'no experience needed, you just have to be a celebrity and rich' is now in play for the position of POTUS.

Trump vs Oprah 2020 will be ****ing epic. Though I'm still holding out for Trump vs Kanye.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Trump didn't make it possible to win without experience. He won because it was already possible.

Trump vs Oprah 2020 will be ****ing epic. Though I'm still holding out for Trump vs Kanye.

Nah, the precedent didn't really exist before, at least not in recent history as you can probably go back to the 1870's and find me one. That's why so many people thought Trump and his antic had no chance.

But It's now a thing because of Trumpers. To be POTUS, one need no experience, just be famous, loud and wealthy. People like The Rock and Zuckerberg now know this.

Trump Vs Kanye is a definite lose/lose for the country

Nah, you're just assuming that Trump was the only one who could crack that barrier. But it's a baseless assumption on your part. Naturally there will always be "no precedent" for the first person to do so, just like there was "no precedent" in 2008 that a black candidate could win.

Nah, no assumptions, cos there was no "no way he could win" in regards to Obama, like Trump had due to his inexperience and shitty antics across the poltical spectrum. So yeah, you're wrong, Trumper's set the "no experience required" precedent and now we've got to deal with it going forward.

They only managed to set the precedent because apparently the "there's no way" rhetoric was actually incorrect. There was a way. Or else he wouldn't have won in the first place.

I mean, people were declaring an almost inevitable victory for the Democrats in 2016 long before Trump even seemed like the most likely Republican nominee. And I actually do remember people saying there's no way a black president was in our immediate future back in the late 90's/early 2000's. People have a hard time predicting things that previously weren't the norm, sometimes.

You agree Trumpers set the precedent then. Good, happy to have educated you 👆

Your racist grandpa is an outlier 👇

I never said he didn't set the precedent. So did Obama for black presidents. Enjoy your consolation prize, since you gave up on the argument at hand.

I said 'Trumpers set the precedent" (they did, never moved from this stance), you came in saying "Trump didn't", so not only did you not follow what I was saying, you're now backtracking your own words. Good job.