Yeah, I don't like the quote, but it's still a line of scaling that exists. 🙂
And no. The question/statement in and of itself is saying that Malak is far more powerful than Kun, the question is towards WHY is Malak far more powerful than Kun: cybernetics or something more sinister?
"An imposing figure with ghostly pale features, prominent Sith tattoos, a gleaming red lightsaber, and devastating Dark Side power, Malak struck terror into the hearts of his former allies. He also wore a vocal mask that may have concealed a form of cybernetic life-support. Did it provide him with powers far greater than even Exar Kun or Freedon Nadd, or was cybernetic enhancement too simple an explanation?"
So the ambiguity isn't in whether or not Malak is far more powerful than Kun, but rather the source of that power.
No one has to take that quote seriously by the way. When Chee said that blurbs were licence to subjectivity, it gave a nice basis to throw out similar hypes that were "out of universe" despite their canonicity.
If you had an opinion of Kun or malak, and that opinion has been altered because Cory Hendon once wrote on his Wizard of the Coast blog that Malak was stronger, it tells me more about your own handling of source material than it does the two characters.
In a span of fifty years, where we both know Vitiate went and split himself between his true body on Dromund Kaas and Valkorion on Zakuul. Given his millennia scale of power growth, I don't see Vitiate's growth surpassing the power Kun had over him, especially after Kun grew even more powerful through the most powerful Sith holocron in the mythos.
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I guess Vitiate grew immensely from TOTJ to when Revan first confronted him. 🙂
Or Skillz, the Wizards of the Coast author didn't factor in the possible implications of the SF Malak quote, due to his own poor analysis of the source material. Please remember this is the same person who claims that Malak's jaw cybernetic, a respiratory system, is a simple explanation for Malak's enhanced "powers" - what a retard.
Remind me again why we're clinging to this quote from a source that doesn't even exist in it's domain name anymore and could only be found in internet archives. Do you also have Bane > Vitiate ?