Comedian vs. Bane

Comedian in his prime in a pure h2h fight with Bane. Fight in an open arena, both know nothing about each other. Who wins?

Comedian wrecks his shit. Even old, drunk as shit, and beat up he was more of a match for Ozymandias than Rorschach and Nite-Owl, either of which would kick Bane's ass easily.

Rorschach would beat Bane easily?

Originally posted by carthage
Rorschach would beat Bane easily?

Yep. He tanked enough damage from Ozy that he could basically ignore Bane's hits. And his fight scene against the police puts him solidly as a better fighter, much faster, and just plain scrappy. Plus he's a brilliant investigator and would deduce from Bane's Darth Vader voice that his mask was his weakness and take it out. Oh, and he's easily strong enough to damage Bane.

Haven't seen Watchmen in a while but from what I can remember any of them, including Spectre, would have kicked Bane's ass.

Banes gets an ass whompin from the Comedian...

Originally posted by KingD19
Yep. He tanked enough damage from Ozy that he could basically ignore Bane's hits. And his fight scene against the police puts him solidly as a better fighter, much faster, and just plain scrappy. Plus he's a brilliant investigator and would deduce from Bane's Darth Vader voice that his mask was his weakness and take it out. Oh, and he's easily strong enough to damage Bane.

shh, don't tell H1 lmao

Comedian. Even if we take Bane's pillar feat at face value, Comedian was still conscious after having his face slammed through a marble counter IIRC. So, Bane will struggle to put him down. In contrast, Comedian is easily strong enough to damage Bane's mask if he had to connect a solid hit to it.

Originally posted by carthage
Rorschach would beat Bane easily?

Next you'll be asking, a nuke is stronger than a firecracker?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Next you'll be asking, a nuke is stronger than a firecracker?

If the firecracker pops with all it's might, then no, a nuke is not stronger than it. You have to go by the manufacturer's intention for the firecracker to be more powerful...duh.

Originally posted by KingD19
If the firecracker pops with all it's might, then no, a nuke is not stronger than it. You have to go by the manufacturer's intention for the firecracker to be more powerful...duh.

It really depends if this happens in a movie, because a nuke in movie will be subject to movie physics which might make it just as weak as a firecracker.

Originally posted by FrothByte
It really depends if this happens in a movie, because a nuke in movie will be subject to movie physics which might make it just as weak as a firecracker.

I've developed a formula in my downtime from teaching Math and being a Martial Arts master that makes this easy to solve.

Originally posted by FrothByte
It really depends if this happens in a movie, because a nuke in movie will be subject to movie physics which might make it just as weak as a firecracker.

If it's in an MCU movie, the Nuke will be so weak Captain America can tank it without issues (like the Sokovia explosion). 😄

(PS. you people might think I am joking, but a certain poster once claimed Cap would survive Sokovia without problems, in an effort to downplay the blast)