Is Mexico the most dangerous country in the world?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nah, that's not what that means. It is almost nonsensical, the term.

Some speculate that it came from a masculinization of "panties" similar to "don't get your panties in a bunch" or "don't get your jimmies rustled" when it popped up on 4chan. This is the most likely definition/usage of the phrase when put into context of its 4chan origins.

If not, then we have sprinkles. Which is just stupid.

I am a retired Rustled Jimmies professor. Please see Robtard for the newest generation of Jimmy Rustling memes and knowledge.

F*cking owned lol. He tried to rebound this and it failed. Hilarious.

Originally posted by Surtur
F*cking owned lol. He tried to rebound this and it failed. Hilarious.

Jimmy slang penis. Related: Jimmy hat; condom.

Apparently, we are supposed to ignore the etymology of a term dating to the 19th-century, because trolls on 4chan used it differently on a dank Harambe meme, less you feel embarrassed that you posted that you take 99 dicks.

Looks like that "f*cking owned" blew up even harder in Surt's face than those 99 cocks would, par for the course.

(Surt, "cock" is slang for penis BTW, I'm not referring to male chickens)

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[b]Jimmy slang penis. Related: Jimmy hat; condom.

Apparently, we are supposed to ignore the etymology of a term dating to the 19th-century, because trolls on 4chan used it differently on a dank Harambe meme, less you feel embarrassed that you posted that you take 99 dicks. [/B]

Jimmies, not jimmy.

And "Rustled Jimmies" predated Harambe public stuff by many many years. It was just gorillas, in general. 2010

And the original 4chan thread?

Jimmies status:

[ ] Not Rustled
[X] Rustled

But wait! There's more!

First known use of it was on Funny Junk.

The popular drawing of the gorilla?

Gorilla Munch Cereal.

This is hilarious to me. I don't know why.

My jimmies are not rustled.

Dis:

YouTube video

So we all agree that if anyone were to have 99 cocks blow up on and all over their face, it would be Surt. Cool 👆

Originally posted by dadudemon
Jimmies, not jimmy.

Jimmies is the plural of Jimmy. It can refer to a single pair of Jimmies (underwear), or to multiple Jimmies (penises).

Since the meme in questions states, "I have 99 Jimmies," it is not grammatically correct unless it refers to the latter:

"I have 99 underwears" does not make grammatical sense, whereas "I have 99 penises," does.

The entire point is that the meme means something other than what its creators intended based on how it is worded.

Originally posted by dadudemon
My jimmies are not rustled.

But would you like your Jimmy rustled?

Romance is brewing I see.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why? Why would I want to visit a place that does nothing for me? I want to go to swanky malls and get awesome treatment at spas when on vacation. I certainly don't want to do nothing and drink bad water in the countryside. It's my vacation.

I can just drive 20 miles north and find shitholes in Oklahoma if I wanted to see impoverished people living in shitholes. I don't need to go to Mexico for that.

Tbh, I think that's sort of missing their point. I believe they were suggesting that the majority of the country wasn't like the area of that country you visited.

Originally posted by Naugrim
Tbh, I think that's sort of missing their point. I believe they were suggesting that the majority of the country wasn't like the area of that country you visited.

Did you read the whole thread?

Where I slept is not where I visited. I was all over the place, like every time I visit.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Jimmies is the plural of Jimmy. It can refer to a single pair of Jimmies (underwear), or to multiple Jimmies (penises).

Man...I think you've got it wrong.

Jimmy is not jimmies.

Jimmies is one underwear or multiple underwear. It's like panties, maaaan.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
But would you like your Jimmy rustled?

Probably not...I'll get a vasectomy so I don't have to worry about using a jimmy.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Man...I think you've got it wrong.

Jimmy is not jimmies.

Jimmies is one underwear or multiple underwear. It's like panties, maaaan.

When a singular article of clothing is also plural, it requires a modifier. To use your example, pair of pairs of panties. So for it to be grammatically correct, and to be referring to underwear, it would need to read, "I have 99 pairs of Jimmies," i.e. "I have 99 pairs of underwear."

Grammar: the difference between "feeling you're nuts," and "feeling your nuts."

Originally posted by dadudemon
Probably not...I'll get a vasectomy so I don't have to worry about using a jimmy.

Who said pregnancy was a possibility?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
When a singular article of clothing is also plural, it requires a modifier. To use your example, pair of pairs of panties. So for it to be grammatically correct, and to be referring to underwear, it would need to read, "I have 99 pairs of Jimmies," i.e. "I have 99 pairs of underwear."

Grammar: the difference between "feeling you're nuts," and "feeling your nuts."

I don't think that applies at all to what we are talking about. Not even a little.

"I have 99 panties." "I have 99 jimmies."

"I have 99 pairs of panties." "I have 99 pairs of jimmies."

"I have 1 pair of panties." "I have one pair of jimmies."

All of those are correct. And not a single would would be correct as "panty" or "jimmy" in this context.

Look, check out wiktionary:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/panty

This is the oddest argument. The inventor of the use has it as jimmies. It has been jimmies and never jimmy. So even if we forget about panties as the female analogue to jimmies...it's still just jimmies and never jimmy.

you're all wrong. "jimmies" in an old term for ice cream sprinkles. so if you're holding a cone and someone bumps into you, some sprinkles fall off. thus that person had rustled your jimmies. you're welcome.

You're all incorrect. Jimmies is a term for multiple people named Jimmy. Now how the hell did my thread get derailed into discussing the historical accuracy of a harambe meme!?

https://billypenn.com/2017/03/20/jimmies-vs-sprinkles-why-philly-fights-over-what-we-call-an-ice-cream-topping/

Originally posted by Robtard
Looks like that "f*cking owned" blew up even harder in Surt's face than those 99 cocks would, par for the course.

(Surt, "cock" is slang for penis BTW, I'm not referring to male chickens)

Originally posted by dadudemon
Jimmies, not jimmy.

And "Rustled Jimmies" predated Harambe public stuff by many many years. It was just gorillas, in general. 2010

And the original 4chan thread?

Jimmies status:

[ ] Not Rustled
[X] Rustled

But wait! There's more!

First known use of it was on Funny Junk.

The popular drawing of the gorilla?

Gorilla Munch Cereal.

This is hilarious to me. I don't know why.

My jimmies are not rustled.

Nope, nothing blew up lol. Try again.

Originally posted by dadudemon

It's very close to true

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're all wrong. "jimmies" in an old term for ice cream sprinkles. so if you're holding a cone and someone bumps into you, some sprinkles fall off. thus that person had rustled your jimmies. you're welcome.

I've already made this point. You're not helping at all. Sprinkles is definitely not the correct use, here. You NU jimmies using "helper."

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
So it's still a lie

No, it's "mostly true."

You're not very familiar with Political Fact Check's truth-0-meter, are you? 🙂